Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automatic detection of abnormal vascular cross-sections based on density level detection and support vector machines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The goal is to automatically detect anomalous vascular cross-sections to attract the radiologist’s attention to possible lesions and thus reduce the time spent to analyze the image volume.

Materials and methods

We assume that both lesions and calcifications can be considered as local outliers compared to a normal cross-section. Our approach uses an intensity metric within a machine learning scheme to differentiate normal and abnormal cross-sections. It is formulated as a Density Level Detection problem and solved using a Support Vector Machine (DLD-SVM). The method has been evaluated on 42 synthetic phantoms and on 9 coronary CT data sets annotated by 2 experts.

Results

The specificity of the method was 97.57% on synthetic data, and 86.01% on real data, while its sensitivity was 82.19 and 81.23%, respectively. The agreement with the observers, measured by the kappa coefficient, was substantial (κ = 0.72). After the learning stage, which is performed off-line, the average processing time was within 10 s per artery.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to use the DLD-SVM approach to detect vascular abnormalities. Good specificity, sensitivity and agreement with experts, as well as a short processing time, show that our method can facilitate medical diagnosis and reduce evaluation time by attracting the reader’s attention to suspect regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adame IM, van der Geest RJ, Wasserman B, Mohamed M, Reiber JHC, Lelieveldt BPF (2004) Automatic plaque characterization and vessel wall segmentation in magnetic resonance images of atherosclerotic carotid arteries. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M (eds) Proceedings of SPIE Med. Imaging 2004: image processing, vol 5370. San Diego, pp 265–273

  2. Barnett V, Lewis T (1994) Outliers in Statistical Data, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellman R (1961) Adaptive control processes. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2001) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm

  5. Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1): 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dehmeshki J, Ye X, Wang F, Lin XY, Abaei M, Siddique MM, Qanadli SD (2004) An accurate and reproducible scheme for quantification of coronary artery calcification in ct scans. In: Proceedings of 26th annual international conference IEEE EMBS. San Francisco, California, USA, pp 1918–1921

  7. Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76(5): 378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA (1998) Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp SL (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI’98, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1496. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández Hoyos M, Orkisz M, Douek PC, Magnin IE (2005) Assessment of carotid artery stenoses in 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, based on improved generation of the centerline. Mach Graph Vis 14(4): 349–378

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hernández Hoyos M, Serfaty JM, Maghiar A, Mansard C, Orkisz M, Magnin IE, Douek PC (2006) Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(3): 167–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hush D, Kelly P, Scovel C, Steinwart I (2005) Provably fast algorithms for anomaly detection. Technical Report LA-UR-05-4367, Los Alamos National Laboratory

  12. Išgum I, Rutten A, Prokop M, van Ginneken B (2007) Detection of coronary calcifications from computed tomography scans for automated risk assessment of coronary artery disease. Med Phys 34(4): 1450–1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang DG, Suh DC, Ra JB (2009) Three-dimensional blood vessel quantification via centerline deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(3): 405–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krissian K, Maladain G, Ayache N (2000) Model based detection of tubular structures in 3D images. Comput Vis Image Unders 80: 130–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lekadir K, Yang GZ (2006) Carotid artery segmentation using an outlier immune 3D active shape models framework. In: Larsen R, Nielsen M, Sporring J (eds) MICCAI 2006, LNCS 4190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Copenhagen, pp 620–627

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lesage D, Angelini ED, Bloch I, Funka-Lea G (2009) A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: Models, features and extraction schemes. Med Image Anal 13(6): 819–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Renard F, Yang Y (2008) Image analysis for detection of coronary artery soft plaques in MDCT images. In: 2008 IEEE International Symposium Biomed. Imaging: from nano to macro (ISBI 2008). Paris, France, pp 25–28

  19. Rinck D, Krüger S, Reimann A, Scheuering M (2006) Shape-based segmentation and visualization techniques for evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary artery disease. In: Cleary KR, Galloway Jr RL (eds) Proceedings of SPIE Med. Imaging 2006: Visualization, image-guided procedures and display, vol 6141, pp 124–132

  20. Salvado O (2006) Characterization of atherosclerosis with magnetic resonance imaging, challenges and validation. Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University

  21. Schaap M, Metz C, van Walsum T, van der Giessen AG, Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Bauer C, Bogunovic H, Castro C, Deng X, Dikici E, O’Donnell T, Frenay M, Friman O, Hernández Hoyos M, Kitslaar PH, Krissian K, Kühnel C, Luengo-Oroz MA, Orkisz M, Smedby Ö, Styner M, Szymczak A, Tek H, Wang C, Warfield SK, Zambal S, Zhang Y, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ (2009) Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. Med Image Anal 13(5): 701–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schölkopf B, Platt JC, Shawe-Taylor J, Smola AJ, Williamson RC (2001) Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Comput 13: 1443–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinwart I, Hush D, Scovel C (2005) A classification framework for anomaly detection. J Mach Learn Res 6: 211–232

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steinwart I, Hush D, Scovel C (2005) Density level detection is classification. Neural Inf Process Syst 17: 1337–1344

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vukadinovic D, van Walsum T, Rozie S, de Weert T, Manniesing R, van der Lugt A, Niessen WJ (2009) Carotid artery segmentation and plaque quantification in CTA. In: Proceedings of 6th IEEE International Symposium Biomed. Images (ISBI’09). Boston, USA, pp 835–838

  26. Wong WCK, Chung ACS (2006) Augmented vessels for quantitative analysis of vascular abnormalities and endovascular treatment planning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25(6): 665–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization: The top ten causes of death—fact sheet N310 (2008)

  28. Wörz S, Rohr K (2007) Segmentation and quantification of human vessels usind a 3D cylindrical intensity model. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(8): 1994–2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao F, Zhang H, Wahle A, Thomas MT, Stolpen AH, Scholz TD, Sonka M (2009) Congenital aortic disease: 4D magnetic resonance segmentation and quantitative analysis. Med Image Anal 13(3): 483–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria A. Zuluaga.

Additional information

This work has been supported by the ECOS-Nord Committee, project C07M04, by the Région Rhône-Alpes (France) via the Simed project of the ISLE research cluster, and by the project CIFI-Uniandes No. 54. M.A. Zuluaga’s PhD project is supported by a Colciencias grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zuluaga, M.A., Magnin, I.E., Hernández Hoyos, M. et al. Automatic detection of abnormal vascular cross-sections based on density level detection and support vector machines. Int J CARS 6, 163–174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0494-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0494-8

Keywords

Navigation