Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative evaluation for accumulative calibration error and video-CT registration errors in electromagnetic-tracked endoscopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Electromagnetic (EM)-guided endoscopy has demonstrated its value in minimally invasive interventions. Accuracy evaluation of the system is of paramount importance to clinical applications. Previously, a number of researchers have reported the results of calibrating the EM-guided endoscope; however, the accumulated errors of an integrated system, which ultimately reflect intra-operative performance, have not been characterized. To fill this vacancy, we propose a novel system to perform this evaluation and use a 3D metric to reflect the intra-operative procedural accuracy.

Methods

This paper first presents a portable design and a method for calibration of an electromagnetic (EM)-tracked endoscopy system. An evaluation scheme is then described that uses the calibration results and EM-CT registration to enable real-time data fusion between CT and endoscopic video images. We present quantitative evaluation results for estimating the accuracy of this system using eight internal fiducials as the targets on an anatomical phantom: the error is obtained by comparing the positions of these targets in the CT space, EM space and endoscopy image space. To obtain 3D error estimation, the 3D locations of the targets in the endoscopy image space are reconstructed from stereo views of the EM-tracked monocular endoscope. Thus, the accumulated errors are evaluated in a controlled environment, where the ground truth information is present and systematic performance (including the calibration error) can be assessed.

Results

We obtain the mean in-plane error to be on the order of 2 pixels. To evaluate the data integration performance for virtual navigation, target video-CT registration error (TRE) is measured as the 3D Euclidean distance between the 3D-reconstructed targets of endoscopy video images and the targets identified in CT. The 3D error (TRE) encapsulates EM-CT registration error, EM-tracking error, fiducial localization error, and optical-EM calibration error.

Conclusion

We present in this paper our calibration method and a virtual navigation evaluation system for quantifying the overall errors of the intra-operative data integration. We believe this phantom not only offers us good insights to understand the systematic errors encountered in all phases of an EM-tracked endoscopy procedure but also can provide quality control of laboratory experiments for endoscopic procedures before the experiments are transferred from the laboratory to human subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krucker J, Xu S, Glossop N et al (2007) Electromagnetic tracking for thermal ablation and biopsy guidance: clinical evaluation of spatial accuracy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18: 1141–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Banovac F, Lin R et al (2006) Electromagnetic tracking for abdominal interventions in computer aided surgery. Comput Aided Surg 11: 127–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A et al (2005) Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16: 493–505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkfellner W, Hummel J, Wilson E, Cleary K (2008) Tracking devices. In: Image-guided interventions. Springer, pp 26–29

  5. Hautmann H, Schneider A, Pinkau T, Peltz F, Feussner H (2005) Electromagnetic catheter navigation during bronchoscopy: validation of a novel method by conventional fluoroscopy. Chest 128: 382–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Solomon SB, White P Jr, Wiener CM, Orens JB, Wang KP (2000) Three-dimensional CT-guided bronchoscopy with a real-time electromagnetic position sensor: a comparison of two image registration methods. Chest 118: 1783–1787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Solomon SB, White P Jr, Acker DE, Strandberg J, Venbrux AC (1998) Real-time bronchoscope tip localization enables three-dimensional CT image guidance for transbronchial needle aspiration in swine. Chest 114: 1405–1410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Superdimension (2003) http://www.Superdimension.com

  9. Konen W, Scholz M, Tombrock S (1997) An image-based navigation support system for neuroendoscopic surgery. In: Ahlers R (ed) Symposium Bildeverarbei\({\lnot}\) tung, Technische Akade

  10. Konen W, Scholz M, Tombrock S (1998) The VN-project: endoscopic image processing for neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 3: 144–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feuerstein M, Wildhirt SM, Bauernschmitt R, Navab N (2005) Automatic patient registration for port placement in minimally invasive endoscopic surgery. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI), pp 287–294

  12. Liewald F, Lang G, Fleiter T, Sokiranski R, Halter G, Orend KH (1998) Comparison of virtual and fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46: 361–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lacasse Y, Martel S, Hebert A, Carrier G, Raby B (2004) Accuracy of virtual bronchoscopy to detect endobronchial lesions. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 1774–1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Wever W, Bogaert J, Verschakelen JA (2005) Virtual bronchoscopy: accuracy and usefulness—an overview. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 26: 364–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Z (2004) Camera calibration with one-dimensional objects. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26: 892–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsai R (1987) A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses. IEEE J Robot Autom [legacy, pre-1988] 3: 323–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Basu A, Ravi K (1997) Active camera calibration using pan, tilt and roll. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 27: 559–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kannala J, Brandt SS (2006) A generic camera model and calibration method for conventional, wide-angle, and fish-eye lenses. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 28: 1335–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martins HA, Birk JR, Kelley RB (1981) Camera models based on data from two calibration planes. Comput Graph Image Process 17: 173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown D (1971) Close-range camera calibration. Photogramm Eng 37: 855–866

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gennery DB (1979) Stereo-camera calibration. In: Proceedings of image understanding workshop, pp 101–108

  22. Willson R (1995) Tsai Camera Calibration Software. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/rgw/www/TsaiCode.html

  23. He XC, Yung NHC (2004) Curvature scale space corner detector with adaptive threshold and dynamic region of support. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on pattern recognition, pp 791–794

  24. Aurora. Aurora Technical Specifications. http://www.ndigital.com/medical/aurora-techspecs-performance.php

  25. Horn BKP (1987) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. J Opt Soc Am 4: 629–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Horn BKP (1986) Robot vision. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bouguet J-Y (2006) Camera calibration toolbox for matlab. http://www.vision.caltech.edu/bouguetj/calib_doc/index.html

  28. Shahidi R, Bax MR, Maurer CR Jr et al (2002) Implementation, calibration and accuracy testing of an image-enhanced endoscopy system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21: 1524–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H, Wong KY, Zhang G (2007) Camera calibration from images of spheres. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29: 499–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao X, Foroosh H (2006) Camera calibration using symmetric objects. IEEE Trans Image Process 15: 3614–3619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Deligianni F, Chung A, Yang G-Z (2006) Non-rigid 2D-3D registration with Catheter Tip EM tracking for patient specific bronchoscope simulation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2006, pp 281–290

  32. Mori K, Deguchi D, Kitasaka T et al (2008) Improvement of accuracy of marker-free bronchoscope tracking using electromagnetic tracker based on bronchial branch information. In: MICCAI 2008, pp 535–542

  33. Helferty JP, Sherbondy AJ, Kiraly AP, Higgins WE (2007) Computer-based system for the virtual-endoscopic guidance of bronchoscopy. Comput Vis Image Underst 108: 171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Interventional Guidance Technology, Philips Research North America, Briarcliff Manor, New York, NY, 10510, USA

    Sheena Xin Liu, Luis F. Gutiérrez & Doug Stanton

Authors
  1. Sheena Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis F. Gutiérrez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Doug Stanton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheena Xin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, S.X., Gutiérrez, L.F. & Stanton, D. Quantitative evaluation for accumulative calibration error and video-CT registration errors in electromagnetic-tracked endoscopy. Int J CARS 6, 407–419 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0518-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0518-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation