Skip to main content
Log in

A neonatal brain MR image template of 1 week newborn

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to detect and treat neonatal cerebral disorders. However, neonatal MR image interpretation is limited by intra- and inter-observer variability. To reduce such variability, a template-based computer-aided diagnosis system is being developed, and several methods for creating templates were evaluated.

Method

Spatial normalization for each individual’s MR images is used to accommodate the individual variation in brain shape. Because the conventional normalization uses as adult brain template, it can be difficult to analyze the neonatal brain, as there are large difference between the adult brain and the neonatal brain. This article investigates three approaches for defining a neonatal template for 1-week-old newborns for diagnosing neonatal cerebral disorders. The first approach uses an individual neonatal head as the template. The second approach applies skull stripping to the first approach, and the third approach produces a template by averaging brain MR images of 7 neonates. To validate the approaches, the normalization accuracy was evaluated using mutual information and anatomical landmarks.

Results

The experimental results of 7 neonates (revised age 5.6 ± 17.6 days) showed that normalization accuracy was significantly higher with the third approach than with the conventional adult template and the other two approaches (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Three approaches to neonatal brain template matching for spinal normalization of MRI scans were applied, demonstrating that a population average gave the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathologic stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82(4): 239–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kitagaki H, Mori E, Yamaji S, Ishii K, Hirono N, Kobashi S, Hata Y (1998) Frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease: evaluation of cortical atrophy with automated hemispheric surface display generated with MR images. Radiology 208(2): 431–439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans AC, Collins DL, Milner B (1992) An MRI-based stereotactic atlas from 250 young normal subjects. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18: 408

    Google Scholar 

  4. Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM (1993) 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes In: Proceedings of the IEEE-nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference, vol 3, pp 1813–1817

  5. Good CD, Johnsrude IS, Ashburner J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS (2001) A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains. NeuroImage 14(1): 21–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2001) Why voxel-based morphometry should be used. NeuroImage 14(6): 1238–1243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barkovich AJ (2000) Concepts of myelin and myelination in neuroradiology. Am J Neuroradiol 21(6): 1099–1109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazemi K, Moghaddam HA, Grebe R, Gondry-Jouet C, Wallois F (2007) A neonatal atlas template for spatial normalization of whole-brain magnetic resonance images of newborns: preliminary results. NeuroImage 37(2): 463–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muragasova M, Doria V, Srinivasan L, Aljabar P, Edwards AD, Rueckert D (2009) A spatio-temporal atlas of the growing brain for fMRI studies, MICCAI 2009 workshop: image analysis of developing brain

  10. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (1999) Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp 7(4): 254–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenkinson M, Pechaud M, Smith S (2005) BET2: MR-based estimation of brain, skull and scalp surfaces, In: Eleventh annual meeting of the organization for human brain mapping

  12. Hashioka A, Yamaguchi K, Kobashi S, Kuramoto K, Wakata Y, Ando K, Ishikura R, Ishikawa T, Hirota S, Hata Y (2011) Neonatal brain MR image segmentation based on system-of-systems in engineering technology In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on system of systems engineering, pp 107–112

  13. Guimond A, Meunier J, Thirion J (2000) Average brain models: a convergence study. Comput Vis Image Unders 77(2): 192–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mases F, Collignon A, Vandermeulen D (1997) Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(2): 187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syoji Kobashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hashioka, A., Kobashi, S., Kuramoto, K. et al. A neonatal brain MR image template of 1 week newborn. Int J CARS 7, 273–280 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0646-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0646-5

Keywords

Navigation