Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The laparoscopic suturing task is a complex procedure that requires objective assessment of surgical skills. Analysis of laparoscopic suturing task components was performed to improve current objective assessment tools.

Methods

Twelve subjects participated in this study as three groups of four surgeons (novices, intermediates and experts). A box-trainer and organic tissue were used to perform the experiment while tool movements were recorded with the augmented reality haptic system. All subjects were right-handed and developed a surgeon’s knot. The laparoscopic suturing procedure was decomposed into four subtasks. Different objective metrics were applied during tool-motion analysis (TMA). Statistical analysis was performed, and results from three groups were compared using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test, considering significant differences when P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Several first, second and fourth subtask metrics had significant differences between the three groups. Subtasks 1 and 2 had more significant differences in metrics than subtask 4. Almost all metrics showed superior task executions accomplished by experts (lower time, total path length and number of movements) compared with intermediates and novices.

Conclusion

The most important subtasks during suture learning process are needle puncture and first knot. The TMA could be a useful objective assessment tool to discriminate surgical experience and could be used in the future to measure and certify surgical proficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ, Bouvy ND (2004) Stress response to laparoscopic surgery—a review. Surg Endosc 18(7): 1022–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beldi G, Ipaktchi R, Wagner M, Gloor B, Candinas D (2006) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safe and cost effective. Surg Endosc 20(1): 92–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247(5): 819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Usón J, Sánchez FM, Pascual S, Climent S (2007) In: Usón J (ed) Formación en Cirugía Laparoscópica Paso a Paso, 3rd edn. Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fried GM (2008) FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic task. J Gastrointest Surg 12(2): 210–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schout BM, Hendrikx JM, Scheele F, Bemelmans BLH, Scherpbier JJ (2010) Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future. Surg Endosc 24(3): 536–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhariwal AK, Prabhu RY, Dalvi AN, Supe AN (2007) Effectiveness of box trainers in laparoscopic training. J Minim Access Surg 3(2): 57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamata P, Gómez E, Sánchez-Margallo F, López Ó, Monserrat C, García V, Alberola C, Rodríguez Florido M, Ruiz J, Usón J (2007) Sinergia laparoscopic virtual reality simulador: didactic design and technical development. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 85(3): 273–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sánchez-Margallo JA, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Pagador JB, Gómez EJ, Sánchez-González P, Usón J, Moreno J (2011) Video-based assistance system for training in minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20(4): 197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers. Is one superior to the other?. Surg Endosc 18: 485–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ (2009) What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?. Surg Endosc 23(8): 1693–1700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Solis J, Oshima N, Ishii H et al (2008) Towards understanding the suture/ligature skills during the training process using WKS-2RII. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(3–4): 231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pagador JB, Uson J, Sánchez MA, Moyano JL, Moreno J, Bustos P, Mateos J, Sánchez-Margallo FM (2011) Electronic device for endosurgical skills training (EDEST): study of reliability. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(3): 367–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reiley CE, Lin HC, Yuh DD, Hager GD (2011) Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation. Surg Endosc 25(2): 356–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xeroulis G, Dubrowski A, Leslie K (2009) Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS. Surg Endosc 23(1): 161–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Datta V, Bann S, Mandalia M, Darzi A (2006) The surgical efficiency score: a feasible, reliable, and valid method of skills assessment. Am J Surg 192(3): 372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gunther S, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Sinanan M (2007) The red DRAGON: a multi-modality system for simulation and training in minimally invasive surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 125: 149–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng C, Haniffa H, Rozenblit J, Hamilton A, Salkini M (2006) Surgical training and performance assessment using a motion tracking system. Proceedings of European modeling and simulation symposium (EMSS), pp 647–652

  19. Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D, Kenmotsu H, Yasunaga T, Konishi K, Ieiri S, Nakashima H, Tanoue K, Hashizume M (2011) Objective assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills using a motion-tracking system. Surg Endosc 25(3): 771–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pagador JB, Sánchez LF, Sánchez JA, Bustos P, Moreno J, Sánchez-Margallo FM (2011) Augmented reality haptic (ARH): an approach of electromagnetic tracking in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 6(2): 257–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Munz Y, Almoudaris AM, Moorthy K et al (2007) Curriculum-based solo virtual reality training for laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying: objective assessment of the transfer of skill from virtual reality to reality. Am J Surg 193(6): 774–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dosis A, Aggarwal R, Bello F et al (2005) Synchronized video and motion analysis for the assessment of procedures in the operating theater. Arch Surg 140(3): 293–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pagador JB, Sánchez-Margallo FM, Sánchez-Peralta L, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Enciso S, Moreno J (2010) Objective assessment of basic laparoscopic skills using automatic video-based technique. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19(Suppl1): 55

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sheskin D (2007) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reiley CE, Hager GD (2009) Task versus subtask surgical skill evaluation of robotic minimally invasive surgery. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv: MICCAI 12(Pt 1): 435–442

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jayaraman S, Trejos AL, Naish MD, Lyle A, Patel RV, Schlachta CM (2011) Toward construct validity for a novel sensorized instrument-based minimally invasive surgery simulation system. Surg Endosc 25(5): 1439–1445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Darzi a, Smith S, Taffinder N (1999) Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective. BMJ 318(7188): 887–888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McClusky Da, Smith CD (2008) Design and development of a surgical skills simulation curriculum. World J Surg 32(2): 171–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chung J, Sackier J (1998) A method of objectively evaluating improvements in laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 12: 1111–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A et al (2004) Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 18(11): 1608–1612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chmarra MK, Jansen FW, Grimbergen Ca, Dankelman J (2008) Retracting and seeking movements during laparoscopic goal-oriented movements. Is the shortest path length optimal?. Surg Endosc 22(4): 943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Allen B, Nistor V, Dutson E et al (2010) Support vector machines improve the accuracy of evaluation for the performance of laparoscopic training tasks. Surg Endosc 24(1): 170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Seymour NE (2008) VR to OR: a review of the evidence that virtual reality simulation improves operating room performance. World J Surg 32(2): 182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Elneel FH, Carter F, Tang B, Cuschieri A (2008) Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22: 31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bioengineering and Health Technologies Unit, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain

    J. B. Pagador, L. F. Sánchez-Peralta, J. A. Sánchez-Margallo & J. L. Moyano-Cuevas

  2. Laparoscopic Unit, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain

    S. Enciso-Sanz

  3. Direction, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain

    F. M. Sánchez-Margallo & J. Usón-Gargallo

  4. Laboratory of Robotics and Artificial Vision, University of Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain

    J. Moreno

Authors
  1. J. B. Pagador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. M. Sánchez-Margallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. F. Sánchez-Peralta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. A. Sánchez-Margallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. L. Moyano-Cuevas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Enciso-Sanz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Usón-Gargallo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. B. Pagador.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pagador, J.B., Sánchez-Margallo, F.M., Sánchez-Peralta, L.F. et al. Decomposition and analysis of laparoscopic suturing task using tool-motion analysis (TMA): improving the objective assessment. Int J CARS 7, 305–313 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0650-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0650-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation