Skip to main content
Log in

Structured reporting using a shared indexed multilingual radiology lexicon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A system for creating structured reports (SRs) using a standardized radiology lexicon was developed and tested to facilitate automated translation of content and multidisciplinary international communications.

Methods

A database of radiology terms, RadLex developed by the Radiological Society of North America, was used to create a shared indexed multilingual radiology lexicon. A diagnostic workstation for generating structured reports (OpenEye) was implemented with a “RadLex manager” function for adding new words to the lexicon in both English and Italian. Sample reports of examinations included in the Medical Imaging Resource Center (MIRC) radiology imaging database of clinical cases were prepared using this system. The system was evaluated for teaching purposes and scientific dissemination.

Results

The OpenEye system was able to manage the glossary to create new SRs and manually translate existing reports containing freely worded descriptions. The OpenEye system provides instant translation from Italian into English and enables clinical cases to be published in the MIRC, while making them accessible for consultation on an international scale.

Conclusion

The SR is advantageous compared with a freely worded report in terms of clarity and completeness of the content. Creating SRs for each clinical case enables rapid and focused analysis at multidisciplinary meetings. All our cases have been included in the MIRC database as part of a broader-based European Project for research on soft tissues sarcomas (CONTICANET).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosmans JML, Weyler JJ, Parizel PM (2009) Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol 72: 354–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naik SS, Hanbidge A, Wilson SR (2001) Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR 176: 591–598

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Langlotz CP (2002) Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology. Radiology 224: 5–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiner BI (2009) The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 22: 562–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobel J, Pearson M, Gross K et al (1996) Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 3: 709–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holman B, Aliabadi P, Silverman S et al (1994) Medical impact of unedited preliminary radiology reports. Radiology 191: 519–521

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seltzer S, Kelly P, Adams D et al (1994) Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists’ report signing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162: 775–781

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kong A, Barnett G, Mosteller F et al (1986) How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med 315: 740–744

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. American College of Radiology (2000) ACR Standard for communication: diagnostic radiology. In: Standards 2000–2001. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, pp 1–3

  10. Hussein R, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP (2004) DICOM structured reporting: part 1. Overview and characteristics. Radiographics 24: 891–896 (review)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silverio R (2009) Il Referto Strutturato. SIRM Web. http://www.sirm.org/it/hot-topic/124-il-referto-strutturato. Accessed 22 september 2009

  12. Clunie DA (2007) DICOM structured reporting and cancer clinical trials results. Cancer Inform 4:33–56. Epub 2007 May 12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noumeir R (2006) Benefits of the DICOM structured report. J Digit Imaging 19: 295–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clunie DA (2000) DICOM Structured Reporting. PixelMed Publishing, Bangor

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin DL (2008) Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21:355–362. Epub 2007 Sep 15

    Google Scholar 

  16. Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH (2009) Survey of hospital clinicians’ preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol. 64(4):386–394; 395–396

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM (2011) The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259: 184–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH (2009) Radiology reporting: a general practitioner’s perspective. Br J Radiol 83: 17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taira RK, Soderland SG, Jakobovits RM (2001) Automatic structuring of radiology free-text reports. Radiographics 21: 237–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mastrangelo G, Fadda E, Cegolon L, Montesco MC, Ray-Coquard I, Buja A, Fedeli U, Frasson A, Spolaore P, Rossi CR (2010) A European project on incidence, treatment, and outcome of sarcoma. BMC Public Health 12;10:188

  21. Kundu S, Itkin M, Gervais DA, Krishnamurthy VN, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Rubin DL, Langlotz CP (2009) The IR Radlex project: an interventional radiology lexicon-a collaborative project of the radiological society of North America and the society of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20: S275–S277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Langlotz CP (2006) RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. Radiographics 26:1595–1597. Erratum in: Radiographics 27:62

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gentili A, Chung CB, Huges T (2007) Informatics in radiology: use of the MIRC DICOM service for clinical trials to automatically create teaching file cases from PACS. Radiographics 27: 269–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang GL, Lim CC (2006) Singapore national medical imaging resource center (SN.MIRC): a world wide web resource for radiology education. Ann Acad Med Singapore 35: 558–563

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussein R, Engelmann U, Schroeter A, Meinzer HP (2004) DICOM structured reporting. Part 2: problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. Radiographics 24: 897–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marwede D, Daumke P, Marko K, Lobsien D, Schulz S, Kahn T (2009) RadLex—German version: a radiological lexicon for indexing image and report information. Rofo 181:38–44. Epub 2008 Dec 11 (German)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Luis ÁM, Aguilar DP, Martín JA (2010) Multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Transl Oncol 12(8): 543–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Welte FJ, Kim SC, Doshi DJ, O’Connor SC, Coughlin BF (2010) Incorporation of a formalized emergency radiology curriculum to facilitate population of a MIRC-based digital teaching file. J Digit Imaging 23(2): 226–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Stramare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stramare, R., Scattolin, G., Beltrame, V. et al. Structured reporting using a shared indexed multilingual radiology lexicon. Int J CARS 7, 621–633 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0663-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0663-4

Keywords

Navigation