Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Precise X-ray and video overlay for augmented reality fluoroscopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The camera-augmented mobile C-arm (CamC) augments any mobile C-arm by a video camera and mirror construction and provides a co-registration of X-ray with video images. The accurate overlay between these images is crucial to high-quality surgical outcomes. In this work, we propose a practical solution that improves the overlay accuracy for any C-arm orientation by: (i) improving the existing CamC calibration, (ii) removing distortion effects, and (iii) accounting for the mechanical sagging of the C-arm gantry due to gravity.

Methods

A planar phantom is constructed and placed at different distances to the image intensifier in order to obtain the optimal homography that co-registers X-ray and video with a minimum error. To alleviate distortion, both X-ray calibration based on equidistant grid model and Zhang’s camera calibration method are implemented for distortion correction. Lastly, the virtual detector plane (VDP) method is adapted and integrated to reduce errors due to the mechanical sagging of the C-arm gantry.

Results

The overlay errors are 0.38±0.06 mm when not correcting for distortion, 0.27±0.06 mm when applying Zhang’s camera calibration, and 0.27±0.05 mm when applying X-ray calibration. Lastly, when taking into account all angular and orbital rotations of the C-arm, as well as correcting for distortion, the overlay errors are 0.53±0.24 mm using VDP and 1.67±1.25 mm excluding VDP.

Conclusion

The augmented reality fluoroscope achieves an accurate video and X-ray overlay when applying the optimal homography calculated from distortion correction using X-ray calibration together with the VDP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azuma RT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Teleoper Virtual Environ 6(4): 355–385

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shuhaiber JH (2004) Augmented reality in surgery. Arch Surg 139(2): 170–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikou C, Digioia AM, Blackwell M, Jaramaz B, Kanade T (2000) Augmented reality imaging technology for orthopaedic surgery. Operat Tech Orthop 10(1): 82–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rolland JP, Wright DL, Kancherla AR (1997) Towards a novel augmented-reality tool to visualize dynamic 3D anatomy. Proc Med Meets Virtual Real 39: 337–347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Navab N, Mitschke M, Schütz O (1999) Camera-augmented mobile C-arm (CAMC) application: 3D reconstruction using a low-cost mobile C-arm. MICCAI 1679(1999): 688–697

    Google Scholar 

  6. Navab N, Heining SM, Traub J (2010) Camera augmented mobile C-Arm (CAMC): calibration, accuracy study, and clinical applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(7): 1412–1423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang L, Landes J, Weidert S et al (2010) First animal cadaver study for interlocking of intramedullary nails under camera augmented mobile C-arm. A surgical workflow based preclinical evaluation. In: Proceedings of IPCAI, lecture notes in computer science, vol 6135/2010, pp 56–66

  8. Nicolau S, Lee PY, Wu HS et al (2011) Fusion of C-arm X-ray image on video view to reduce radiation exposure and improve orthopedic surgery planning: first in-vivo evaluation. In: Proceedings of 15th annual conference of the international society for computer aided surgery. Computer assisted radiology and surgery

  9. Wang L, Traub J, Weidert S, Heining SM, Euler E, Navab N (2010) Parallax-free intraoperative X-ray image stitching. Med Image Anal 14(5): 674–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Navab N, Wiesner S, Benhimane S, Euler E, Heining SM (2006) Visual servoing for intraoperative positioning and repositioning of mobile C-arms. MICCAI 9(1): 551–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Z (2000) A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans PAMI 22(11): 1330–1334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Groher M (2003) Development of a planning and navigation tool for endoscopic treatment of aortic aneurysms-computer supported implantation of a stent graft. PhD thesis. Fakultät für Informatik, Technische Universität München

  13. Yaniv Z, Joskowicz L, Simkin A (1998) Fluoroscopic image processing for computer-aided orthopedic surgery. In: MICCAI. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1496, pp 325–334

  14. Shechter G (2004) Respiratory motion of the heart: implications for magnetic resonance coronary angiography. PHD thesis, Johns Hopkins University

  15. Fahrig R, Holdsworth DW (2000) Three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction using a C-arm mounted XRII: correction of the image intensifier distortion. Med Phys 27(30): 9

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen X, Wang LJ, Fallavollita P, Navab N (2012) Error analysis of the X-ray projection geometry of camera-augmented mobile C-arm. Proc SPIE 8316: 83160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaniv Z (2004) Long bone panoramas from fluoroscopic X-Ray images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(1): 26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rampersaud YR, Simon DA, Foley KT (2001) Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Image-Guid Surg 26(4): 352–359

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang L, Fallavollita P, Zou R, Chen X, Weidert S, Navab N (2012) Closed-form inverse kinematics for interventional C-arm X-ray imaging with six degrees of freedom: modeling and application. IEEE Trans Med Imaging (to appear)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lejing Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Wang, L., Fallavollita, P. et al. Precise X-ray and video overlay for augmented reality fluoroscopy. Int J CARS 8, 29–38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0746-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0746-x

Keywords

Navigation