Skip to main content
Log in

A cognitive engineering framework for the specification of information requirements in medical imaging: application in image-guided neurosurgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study proposes a framework coming from cognitive engineering, which makes it possible to define what information content has to be displayed or emphasised from medical imaging, for assisting clinicians according to their level of expertise in the domain.

Method

We designed a rating scale to assess visualisation systems in image-guided neurosurgery with respect to the depiction of the neurosurgical work domain. This rating scale was based on a neurosurgical work domain analysis. This scale has been used to evaluate visualisation modes among neurosurgeons, residents and engineers. We asked five neurosurgeons, ten medical residents and ten engineers to rate two visualisation modes from the same data (2D MR image vs. 3D computerised image). With this method, the amount of abstract and concrete work domain information displayed by each visualisation mode can be measured.

Results

A global difference in quantities of perceived information between both images was observed. Surgeons and medical residents perceived significantly more information than engineers for both images. Unlike surgeons, however, the amount of information perceived by residents and engineers significantly decreased as information abstraction increased.

Conclusions

We demonstrated the possibility of measuring the amount of work domain information displayed by different visualisation modes of medical imaging according to different user profiles. Engineers in charge of the design of medical image-guided surgical systems did not perceive the same set of information as surgeons or even medical residents. This framework can constitute a user-oriented approach to evaluate the amount of perceived information from image-guided surgical systems and support their design from a cognitive engineering point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hounsfield GN (1979) Computed medical imaging. Nobel lecture Physiology or Medicine, pp 568–586

  2. Gao XW, Qian Y, Hui R (2011) The state of the art of medical imaging technology: from creation to archive and back. Open Med Inf J 5: 73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apuzzo MLJ (2000) Reinventing neurosurgery: entering the third millennium. Neurosurgery 46: 1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP (2001) The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Rev 35: 146–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thorpe S (1994) Les mécanismes de prise d’information. In: Seron X, Jeannerod M (eds) Neuropsychologie humaine. Mardaga, Paris, pp 152–178

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tietjen C, Isenberg T, Preim B (2005) Combining silhouettes, surface and volume rendering for surgery education and planning. In: Duke DJ, Joy KI (eds) Eurographics, IEEE VGTC symposium on visualization

  8. Stoyanov D, Mylonas GP, Lerotic M, Chung AJ, Yang G-Z (2008) Intra-operative visualizations: perceptual fidelity and human factors. J Disp Technol 4: 491–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansen C, Zidowitz S, Schenk A, Oldhafer K-J, Lang H, Peitgen H-O (2010) Risk maps for navigation in liver surgery. Medical imaging 2010: visualization, image-guided procedures, and modeling, proceedings of the SPIE, vol 7625, pp 1–8

  10. Wieman TJ, Wieman EA (2004) systems approach to error prevention in medicine. J Surg Oncol 88: 115–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vicente KJ, Rasmussen J (1992) Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22: 586–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vicente KJ (2002) Ecological interface design: process and challenges. Hum Factors 44: 62–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharp TD, Helmicki AJ (1998) The application of the ecological interface design approach to neonatal intensive care medicine. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, 42th annual meeting, Santa Monica, CA, pp 350–354

  14. Miller A (2004) A work domain analysis framework for modelling intensive care unit patients. Cogn Technol Work 6: 207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Watson M, Russel WJ, Sanderson P (1999) Ecological interface design for anaesthesia monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Australasian conference on computer-human interaction, 9th annual meeting, Wagga Wagga, Australia, pp 78–84

  16. Hajdukiewicz JR, Vicente KJ, Doyle DJ, Milgram P, Burns CM (2001) Modeling a medical environment: an ontology for integrated medical medical informatics design. Int J Med Inform 62: 79–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Momtahan RN, Burns CM (2004) Applications of ecological interface design in supporting the nursing process. J Health Inform Manag 18: 74–82

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hettinger LJ, Tannen RS, Geiselman EE, Brickman BJ, Moroney BW (1998) Surgical strike: interface design across task domains. In: Fourth symposium on human interaction with complex systems, pp 131–142

  19. Morineau T, Morandi X, Le Moëllic N, Diabira S, Riffaud L, Haegelen C, Hénaux P-L, Jannin P (2009) Decision making during preoperative surgical planning. Hum Factors 51: 67–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis, toward safe, productive and healthy computer-based work. Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morineau T, Frénod E, Blanche C, Tobin L (2009) Turing machine as an ecological model for task analysis. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 10: 511–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jannin P, Raimbault M, Morandi X, Riffaud L, Gibaud B (2003) Model of surgical procedures for multimodal image-guided neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 8: 98–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jamieson GA (2003) Bridging the gap between cognitive work analysis and ecological interface design. In: Proceedings of the 47th annual meeting of human factors and ergonomics society human factors and ergonomics society

  24. Burns CM, Hajdukiewicz JR (2004) Ecological interface design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vicente KJ (2002) Ecological interface design: process and challenges. Hum Factors 44: 62–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Morineau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morineau, T., Morandi, X., Le Moëllic, N. et al. A cognitive engineering framework for the specification of information requirements in medical imaging: application in image-guided neurosurgery. Int J CARS 8, 291–300 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0781-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0781-7

Keywords

Navigation