Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Left ventricle wall motion quantification from echocardiographic images by non-rigid image registration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of applying a new non-rigid image registration method on two-dimensional echocardiographic images for computing the left ventricle (LV) myocardial motion field over a cardiac cycle.

Methods

The key feature of our method is to register all images in the sequence to a reference image (end-diastole image) using a hierarchical transformation model, which is a combination of an affine transformation for modeling the global LV motion and a free-form deformation (FFD) transformation based on B-splines for modeling the local LV deformation. Registration is done by minimizing a cost function associated with the image similarity based on a global pixel-based matching and the smoothness of transformation. The algorithm uses a fast and robust optimization strategy using a multiresolution approach for the estimation of parameters of the deformation model. The proposed algorithm is evaluated for calculating the displacement curves of two expert-identified anatomical landmarks in apical views of the LV for 10 healthy volunteers and 14 subjects with pathology. The proposed algorithm is also evaluated for classifying the regional LV wall motion abnormality using the calculation of the strain value at the end of systole in 288 segments as scored by two consensual experienced echocardiographers in a three-point scale: 1: normokinesia, 2: hypokinesia, and 3: akinesia. Moreover, we compared the results of the proposed registration algorithm to those previously obtained using the other image registration methods.

Results

Regarding to the reference two experienced echocardiographers, the results demonstrate the proposed algorithm more accurately estimates the displacement curve of the two anatomical landmarks in apical views than the other registration methods in all data set. Moreover, the p values of the t test for the strain value of each segment at the end of systole measured by the proposed algorithm show higher differences than the other registration method. These differences are between each pair of scores in all segments and in three segments of septum independently.

Conclusions

The clinical results show that the proposed algorithm can improve both the calculation of the displacement curve of every point of LV during a cardiac cycle and the classification of regional LV wall motion abnormality. Therefore, this diagnostic system can be used as a useful tool for clinical evaluation of the regional LV function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM et al (2010) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation 121: 46–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gottdiener JS, Bednarz J, Devereux R et al (2004) Recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials: a report from the american society of echocardiography’s guidelines and standards committee and the task force on echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiog 17: 1086–1119

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al (2006) Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 7: 79–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blondheim DS, Beeri R, Feinberg MS et al (2010) Reliability of visual assessment of global and segmental left ventricular function: a multicenter study by the Israeli Echocardiography Research Group. J Am Soc Echcardiogr 23: 258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mor-Avi V, Vignon P, Koch R et al (1997) Segmental analysis of color kinesis images: new method for quantification of the magnitude and timing of endocardial motion during left ventricular systole and diastole. Circulation 95: 2082–2097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vignon P, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L et al (1998) Quantitative evaluation of global and regional left ventricular diastolic function with color kinesis. Circulation 97: 1053–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vermes E, Guyon P, Weingrod M et al (2000) Assessment of left ventricular regional wall motion by color kinesis technique: comparison with angiographic findings. Echocardiogr J Card 17: 521–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krahwinkel W, Haltern G, Gülker H (2000) Echocardiographic quantification of regional left ventricular wall motion with color kinesis. Am J Cardiol 85: 245–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun JP, Super DM, Salvator A et al (2002) Quantification of regional left ventricular wall motion in newborns by color kinesis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15: 356–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sutherland GR, Stewart MJ, Groundstroem KW et al (1994) Color Doppler myocardial imaging: a new technique for the assessment of myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7: 441–458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sutherland GR, Salvo GD, Claus P et al (2004) Strain and strain rate imaging: a new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17: 788–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J et al (2002) Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans: validation against three dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 106: 50–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Urheim S, Edvardsen T, Torp H et al (2000) Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation 102: 1158–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Edvardsen T, Skulstad H, Aakhus S et al (2001) Regional myocardial systolic function during acute myocardial ischemia assessed by strain Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 726–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stoylen A, Heimdal A, Bjornstad K et al (1999) Strain rate imaging by ultrasound in the diagnosis of regional dysfunction of the left ventricle. Echocardiogr J Card 16: 321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacob G, Noble JA, Behrenbruch C et al (2002) A shape-space-based approach to tracking myocardial borders and quantifying regional left-ventricular function applied in echocardiography. IEEE T Med Imaging 21: 226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacob G, Noble JA, Kelion AD et al (2001) Quantitative regional analysis of myocardial wall motion. Ultrasound Med Biol 27: 773–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bansod P, Desai UB, Merchant SN et al (2011) Segmentation of left ventricle in short-axis echocardiographic sequences by weighted radial edge filtering and adaptive recovery of dropout regions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 14: 603–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qazi M, Fung G, Krishnan S (2007) Automated heart abnormality detection using sparse linear classifiers. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 26: 56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bosch JG, Nijland F, Mitchell SC et al (2005) Computer-aided diagnosis via model-based shape analysis: automated classification of wall motion abnormalities in echocardiograms. Acad Radiol 12: 358–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leung KY, Bosch JG (2008) Segmental wall motion classification in echocardiograms using compact shape descriptors. Acad Radiol 15: 1416–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marsousi M, Eftekhari A, Kocharian A, Alirezaie J (2010) Endocardial boundary extraction in left ventricular echocardiographic images using fast and adaptive B-spline snake algorithm. Int J Comp Assist Radiol Surg 5: 501–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cannesson M, Tanabe M, Suffoletto MS et al (2007) Novel two-dimensional echocardiographic image analysis system using artificial intelligence-learned pattern recognition for rapid automated ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 217–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gifani P, Behnam H, Shalbaf A et al (2010) Automatic detection of end-diastole and end-systole from echocardiography images using manifold learning. Physiol Meas 31: 1091–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Korinek J, Wang J, Sengupta PP (2005) Two-dimensional strain: a Doppler independent ultrasound method for quantitation of regional deformation: validation in vitro and in vivo. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18: 1247–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amundsen BH, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T et al (2006) Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 789– 793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liel-Cohen N, Tsadok Y, Beeri R et al (2010) A new tool for automatic assessment of segmental wall motion based on longitudinal 2D strain: a multicenter study by the Israeli echocardiography research group. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3: 47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Perk G, Tunick PA, Kronzon I (2007) Non-Doppler two-dimensional strain imaging by echocardiography: from technical considerations to clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20: 234–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kukucka M, Nasseri B, Tscherkaschin A et al (2009) The feasibility of speckle tracking for intraoperative assessment of regional myocardial function by transesophageal echocardiography. J Cardiothor Vasc An 23: 462–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ledesma-Carbayo MJ, Mahía-Casado P, Santos A et al (2006) Cardiac motion analysis from ultrasound sequences using nonrigid registration: validation against Doppler tissue velocity. Ultrasound Med Biol 32: 483–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu T, Zhou H, Pang Y, Lin F, Wu J (2005) Registration of ultrasonic cardiac images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 6: 6583–6586

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klein S, Staring M, Pluim JPW (2007) Evaluation of optimization methods for nonrigid medical imaging registration using mutual information and B-splines. IEEE Trans Image Process 16: 2879–2890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee S, Wolberg G, Chwa KY et al (1996) Image metamorphosis with scattered feature constraints. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2: 337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bardinet E, Cohen LD, Ayache N (1996) Tracking and motion analysis of the left ventricle with deformable superquadrics. Med Image Anal 1: 129–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wahba G (1990) Spline models for observational data. Soceity for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia

  36. Studholme C, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (1997) Automated 3D registration of MR and PET brain images by multi-resolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Med Phys 24: 25–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kybic J, Unser M (2003) Fast parametric elastic image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process 12: 1427–1442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Abd-Elmoniem KZ, Stuber M, Prince JL (2008) Direct three-dimensional myocardial strain tensor quantification and tracking using zHARP. Med Image Anal 12: 778–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. http://www.yale.edu/imaging/echo_atlas/views

  40. Torp AH, Rabben SI, Stoylen A et al (2004) Detection and tracking of left ventricular landmarks in echocardiography. Proc IEEE Int Ultrason Symp 474–477

  41. Willenheimer R, Cline C, Erhardt L (1997) Left ventricular atrioventricular plane displacement: an echocardiographic technique for rapid assessment of prognosis in heart failure. Heart 78: 230– 236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Eto Y, Yamada H, Shin JH et al (2005) Automated mitral annular tracking: a novel method for evaluating mitral annular motion using two dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18: 306–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nevo ST, van Stralen M, Vossepoel AM et al (2007) Automated tracking of the mitral valve annulus motion in apical echocardiographic images using multidimensional dynamic programming. Ultrasound Med Biol 33: 1389–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Reckefuss N, Butz T, Horstkotte D, Faber L (2011) Evaluation of longitudinal and radial left ventricular function by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in a large cohort of normal probands. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27: 515–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Ahmad Shalbaf & Hamid Behnam

  2. Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

    Zahra Alizade-Sani & Maryam Shojaifard

Authors
  1. Ahmad Shalbaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamid Behnam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zahra Alizade-Sani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maryam Shojaifard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Behnam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shalbaf, A., Behnam, H., Alizade-Sani, Z. et al. Left ventricle wall motion quantification from echocardiographic images by non-rigid image registration. Int J CARS 7, 769–783 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0786-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-012-0786-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation