Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of a glass-free medical three-dimensional autostereoscopic display in neurosurgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

  Many stereoscopic displays require glasses that are awkward or inappropriate for use in a neurosurgical operating room. A glass-free three-dimensional autostereoscopic display (3DAD) monitor was developed and tested for neurosurgical applications.

Methods

   Our 3DAD system uses images acquired from nine directions projected into the viewer’s eyes through 1,280 lenticular lenses (\(\text {1,280} \times 720\) pixels). The viewer interprets these as a single stereoscopic image. To evaluate the 3D visualization capabilities of the 3DAD system, 3D images of blood vessels created from brain magnetic resonance angiography were presented to 20 neurosurgeons on both a standard medical two-dimensional (2D) monitor and our 3DAD monitor. Discrimination of the positional relationships for each vessel was recorded. The observers were asked to identify blood vessels located in front of three pairs of points on each image.

Results

   The neurosurgeon observers achieved significantly higher correct responses using the 3DAD monitor compared with the 2D monitor (91.7 vs. 56.7 %, \(p<0.0001\)). There were no reports of problems such as eye fatigue or discomfort.

Conclusion

   Displaying 3D volume rendered multimodality images with a 3DAD monitor is useful for anatomical discrimination of 3D vessels in MR angiography. This technology may be useful for a wide variety of clinical applications such as rapid and precise diagnosis, surgical simulation, and medical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wade NJ (2012) Wheatstone and the origins of moving stereoscopic images. Perception 41(8):901–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks MS, Read JC, Allison RS, Watt SJ (2012) Stereoscopy and the human visual system. SMPTE Motion Imaging J 121(4):24–43. doi:10.5594/j18173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jinnin M, Fukushima S, Masuguchi S, Tanaka H, Kawashita Y, Ishihara T, Ihn H (2011) Evaluation of usefulness of 3D views for clinical photography. Biosci Trends 5(5):211–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abildgaard A, Witwit AK, Karlsen JS, Jacobsen EA, Tennoe B, Ringstad G, Due-Tonnessen P (2010) An autostereoscopic 3D display can improve visualization of 3D models from intracranial MR angiography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(5):549–554. doi:10.1007/s11548-010-0509-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liao H, Dohi T, Nomura K (2010) Autostereoscopic 3D display with long visualization depth using referential viewing area based integral photography. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2010.267

  6. Fukushima R, Taira K, Saishu T, Hirayama Y (2004) Novel viewing zone control method for computer-generated integral 3-D imaging. Proc SPIE 5291:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirayama Y (2008) One-dimensional integral imaging 3D display systems. Proc 3rd Int Univers Commun Symp 6803: 141–145

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lippmann MG (1908) Epreuves reversibles. Photographies integrales. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences 146:446–451

  9. Nagatani H, Hirayama Y (2008) Evaluation of the influence on the human body of the autostereoscopic display based on the integral imaging method. Proc SPIE 6803:68030E.68031–68030E.68038

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chan S, Conti F, Salisbury K, Blevins NH (2013) Virtual reality simulation in neurosurgery: technologies and evolution. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):A154–164. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182750d26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferroli P, Tringali G, Acerbi F, Schiariti M, Broggi M, Aquino D, Broggi G (2013) Advanced 3-dimensional planning in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):A54–62. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182748ee8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malone HR, Syed ON, Downes MS, D’Ambrosio AL, Quest DO, Kaiser MG (2010) Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery 67(4):1105–1116. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ee46d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meglan D, Champion HR (2011) Neurosurgery simulation. Neurosurgery 68(5):E1508; author reply E1508–1509. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318210f038

  14. Mitha AP, Almekhlafi MA, Janjua MJ, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG (2013) Simulation and augmented reality in endovascular neurosurgery: lessons from aviation. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):A107–114. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827981fd

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund no. 23-A-49.

Conflict of interest

The all authors (Yoshitaka Narita1, Shinsuke Tsukagoshi, Masahiro Suzuki, Yasuji Miyakita, Makoto Ohno, Hideyuki Arita, Yasuo Saito, Yoshiyuki Kokojima, Naofumi Watanabe, Noriyuki Moriyama, Soichiro Shibui) declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshitaka Narita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narita, Y., Tsukagoshi, S., Suzuki, M. et al. Usefulness of a glass-free medical three-dimensional autostereoscopic display in neurosurgery. Int J CARS 9, 905–911 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-0984-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-0984-1

Keywords

Navigation