Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Controlling motion prediction errors in radiotherapy with relevance vector machines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Robotic radiotherapy can precisely ablate moving tumors when time latencies have been compensated. Recently, relevance vector machines (RVM), a probabilistic regression technique, outperformed six other prediction algorithms for respiratory compensation. The method has the distinct advantage that each predicted point is assumed to be drawn from a normal distribution. Second-order statistics, the predicted variance, were used to control RVM prediction error during a treatment and to construct hybrid prediction algorithms.

Methods

First, the duty cycle and the precision were correlated to the variance by interrupting the treatment if the variance exceeds a threshold. Second, two hybrid algorithms based on the variance were developed, one consisting of multiple RVMs (\(\hbox {HYB}_{\textit{RVM}}\)) and the other of a combination between a wavelet-based least mean square algorithm (wLMS) and a RVM (\(\hbox {HYB}_{\textit{wLMS}-\textit{RVM}}\)). The variance for different motion traces was analyzed to reveal a characteristic variance pattern which gives insight in what kind of prediction errors can be controlled by the variance.

Results

Limiting the variance by a threshold resulted in an increased precision with a decreased duty cycle. All hybrid algorithms showed an increased prediction accuracy compared to using only their individual algorithms. The best hybrid algorithm, \(\hbox {HYB}_{\textit{RVM}}\), can decrease the mean RMSE over all 304 motion traces from \(0.18\,\)mm for a linear RVM to \(0.17\,\)mm.

Conclusions

The predicted variance was shown to be an efficient metric to control prediction errors, resulting in a more robust radiotherapy treatment. The hybrid algorithm \(\hbox {HYB}_{\textit{RVM}}\) could be translated to clinical practice. It does not require further parameters, can be completely parallelised and easily further extended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This results in some minor differences in the prediction accuracy compared to [2].

References

  1. Depuydt T, Haas O, Verellen D, Erbel S, De Ridder M, Storme G (2010) Geometric accuracy evaluation of the new VERO stereotactic body radiation therapy system. In: Burnham KJ, Ersanilli VE (eds) Proceedings of the UKACC international conference on control. Cambridge, UK, pp 613–619

  2. Dürichen R, Wissel T, Ernst F, Schweikard A (2013) Respiratory motion compensation with relevance vector machines. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention MICCAI 2013. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8150. Springer, Berlin, pp 108–115

  3. Ernst F, Dürichen R, Schlaefer A, Schweikard A (2013) Evaluating and comparing algorithms for respiratory motion prediction. Phys Med Biol 58(11):3911–3929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst F, Schlaefer A, Schweikard A (2007) Prediction of respiratory motion with wavelet-based multiscale autoregression. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention MICCAI 2007, vol 4792. Springer, Berlin, pp 668–675

  5. Giraud P, De Rycke Y, Dubray B, Helfre S, Voican D, Guo L, Rosenwald JC, Keraudy K, Housset M, Touboul E, Cosset JM (2001) Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) planning for lung cancer: analysis of intrathoracic organ motion during extreme phases of breathing. Int J Radiat Oncol* Biol* Phys 51(4):1081–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu W, Prncipe J (2008) Kernel affine projection algorithms. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2008(1):784292

  7. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes in machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ruan D (2010) Prospective detection of large prediction errors: a hypothesis testing approach. Phys Med Biol 55(13):3885

  9. Sayeh S, Wang J, Main WT, Kilby W, Calvin RM (2007) Respiratory motion tracking for robotic radiosurgery. In: Treating tumors that move with respiration. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–29

  10. Seppenwoolde Y, Berbeco RI, Nishioka S, Shirato H, Heijmen B (2007) Accuracy of tumor motion compensation algorithm from a robotic respiratory tracking system: a simulation study. Med Phys 34(7):2774

  11. Seppenwoolde Y, Shirato H, Kitamura K, Shimizu S, van Herk M, Lebesque JV, Miyasaka K (2002) Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol * Biol * Phys 53(4):822–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tipping ME (2001) Sparse bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine. J Mach Learn Res 1:211–244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Robert Dürichen, Tobias Wissel and Achim Schweikard declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Dürichen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dürichen, R., Wissel, T. & Schweikard, A. Controlling motion prediction errors in radiotherapy with relevance vector machines. Int J CARS 10, 363–371 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1008-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1008-x

Keywords

Navigation