Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automatic segmentation of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses from cone-beam CT images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A patient-specific upper airway model is important for clinical, education, and research applications. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used for imaging the upper airway but automatic segmentation is limited by noise and the complex anatomy. A multi-step level set segmentation scheme was developed for CBCT volumetric head scans to create a 3D model of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.

Methods

Gaussian mixture model thresholding and morphological operators are first employed to automatically locate the region of interest and to initialize the active contour. Second, the active contour driven by the Kullback–Leibler (K–L) divergence energy in a level set framework to segment the upper airway. The K–L divergence asymmetry is used to directly minimize the K–L divergence energy on the probability density function of the image intensity. Finally, to refine the segmentation result, an anisotropic localized active contour is employed which defines the local area based on shape prior information. The method was tested on ten CBCT data sets. The results were evaluated by the Dice coefficient, the volumetric overlap error (VOE), precision, recall, and \(F\)-score and compared with expert manual segmentation and existing methods.

Results

The nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses were segmented in CBCT images with a median accuracy of 95.72 % [93.82–96.72 interquartile range] by Dice, 8.73 % [6.79–12.20] by VOE, 94.69 % [93.80–94.97] by precision, 97.73 % [92.70–98.79] by recall, and 95.72 % [93.82–96.69] by \(F\)-score.

Conclusion

Automated CBCT segmentation of the airway and paranasal sinuses was highly accurate in a test sample of clinical scans. The method may be useful in a variety of clinical, education, and research applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jia W-H, Qin H-D (2012) Non-viral environmental risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review. Semin Cancer Biol 22(2):117–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ (2002) Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165(9):1217–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lethbridge M, Schiller JS, Bernadel L (2004) Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 10:222

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guijarro-Martinez R, Swennen GR (2011) Cone-beam computerized tomography imaging and analysis of the upper airway: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40(11):1227–1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K (2012) Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 81(2):267–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Dijck EV, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R (2009) Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 71(3):461–468 osteoporosis

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutthiprapaporn P, Tanimoto K, Ohtsuka M, Nagasaki T, Konishi M, Iida Y, Katsumata A (2008) Improved inspection of the lateral pharyngeal recess using cone-beam computed tomography in the upright position. Oral Radiol 24:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, Langlais RP (2006) Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alsufyani NA, Flores-Mir C, Major PW (2012) Three-dimensional segmentation of the upper airway using cone beam CT: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41(4):276–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogawa T, Enciso R, Shintaku WH, Clark GT (2007) Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:102–108

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Celenk M, Farrell ML, Eren H, Kumar K, Singh GD, Lozanoff S (2010) Upper airway detection and visualization from cone beam image slices. J Xray Sci Technol 18:121–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, Sameshima GT, Enciso R, Pham J, Grauer D (2012) Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142(6):801–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. El H, Palomo JM (2010) Measuring the airway in 3 dimensions: A reliability and accuracy study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:S50.e1–S50.e9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stratemann S, Huang JC, Maki K, Hatcher D, Millere AJ (2011) Three-dimensional analysis of the airway with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:607–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi H, Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2006) Upper airway segmentation and dimensions estimation from cone-beam CT image datasets. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng I, Nilufar S, Flores-Mir C, Basu A (2007) Airway segmentation and measurement in CT images. In: 29th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society’2007. IEEE EMBC, Lyon, France

  17. Osher S, Fedkiw R (2003) Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 22(1):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lankton S, Tannenbaum A (2008) Localizing region-based active contours. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(11):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Serra JP (1982) Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press Inc, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michailovich O, Rathi Y, Tannenbaum A (2007) Image segmentation using active contours driven by the Bhattacharyya gradient flow. IEEE Trans Image Process 16(11):2787–2801

  22. Lorensen WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graph 21(4):163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2):266–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trvillot V, Sobral R, Dombre E, Poignet P, Herman B, Crampette L (2013) Innovative endoscopic sino-nasal and anterior skull base robotics. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(6):977–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nhat Linh Bui.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 203 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bui, N.L., Ong, S.H. & Foong, K.W.C. Automatic segmentation of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses from cone-beam CT images. Int J CARS 10, 1269–1277 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1134-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-014-1134-5

Keywords

Navigation