Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-operative adjustment of standard planes in C-arm CT image data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With the help of an intra-operative mobile C-arm CT, medical interventions can be verified and corrected, avoiding the need for a post-operative CT and a second intervention. An exact adjustment of standard plane positions is necessary for the best possible assessment of the anatomical regions of interest but the mobility of the C-arm causes the need for a time-consuming manual adjustment. In this article, we present an automatic plane adjustment at the example of calcaneal fractures.

Methods

We developed two feature detection methods (2D and pseudo-3D) based on SURF key points and also transferred the SURF approach to 3D. Combined with an atlas-based registration, our algorithm adjusts the standard planes of the calcaneal C-arm images automatically. The robustness of the algorithms is evaluated using a clinical data set. Additionally, we tested the algorithm’s performance for two registration approaches, two resolutions of C-arm images and two methods for metal artifact reduction.

Results

For the feature extraction, the novel 3D-SURF approach performs best. As expected, a higher resolution (\(512^3\) voxel) leads also to more robust feature points and is therefore slightly better than the \(256^3\) voxel images (standard setting of device). Our comparison of two different artifact reduction methods and the complete removal of metal in the images shows that our approach is highly robust against artifacts and the number and position of metal implants.

Conclusions

By introducing our fast algorithmic processing pipeline, we developed the first steps for a fully automatic assistance system for the assessment of C-arm CT images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allaire S, Kim JJ, Breen SL, Jaffray DA, Pekar V (2008) Full orientation invariance and improved feature selectivity of 3d sift with application to medical image analysis. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2008. CVPRW’08, pp 1–8

  2. Barth K, Dennerlein F, Brunner T, Fieselmann A, Graumann R (2013) Infinite impulse response filtering for cone beam tomography. In: Proceedings of SPIE 8668, medical imaging 2013, physics of medical imaging, 86682U

  3. Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Gool LV (2008) SURF: speeded up robust features. Comput Vis Image Underst (CVIU) 110(3):346–359. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) Method for registration of 3-d shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256. doi:10.1109/34.121791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brehler M, Görres J, Wolf I, Franke J, von Recum J, Grützner PA, Meinzer HP, Nabers D (2014) Automatic standard plane adjustment on mobile c-arm ct images of the calcaneus using atlas-based feature registration. In: Proceedings of SPIE 9036, medical imaging 2014, image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling, 90360E (2014). doi:10.1109/CVPR.2001.990517

  6. Brown M, Lowe DG (2002) Invariant features from interest point groups. In: BMVC, s1

  7. Chen J, Tian J (2006) Rapid multi-modality preregistration based on sift descriptor. In: 28th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, 2006. EMBS’06, pp 1437–1440

  8. Cheung W, Hamarneh G (2007) N-sift: N-dimensional scale invariant feature transform for matching medical images. In: 4th IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, 2007. ISBI 2007. pp 720–723

  9. Franke J, Wendl K, Suda AJ, Giese T, Grützner PA, von Recum J (2014) Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (JBJS) 96(9):e72. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.01220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geerling J, Kendoff D, Citak M, Zech S, Gardner MJ, Hüfner T, Krettek C, Richter M (2009) Intraoperative 3D imaging in calcaneal fracture care-clinical implications and decision making. J Trauma-Injury Infect Crit Care 66(3):768–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan NY, McCane B, Wyvill G (2011) Sift and surf performance evaluation against various image deformations on benchmark dataset. In: International conference on digital image computing techniques and applications (DICTA), 2011, pp 501–506

  12. Liao PS, Chen TS, Chung PC (2001) A fast algorithm for multilevel thresholding. J Inf Sci Eng 17(5):713–727

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lukashevich P, Zalesky B, Ablameyko S (2011) Medical image registration based on surf detector. Pattern Recognit Image Anal 21(3):519–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelrieß M (2012) Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 39(4):1904–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Müller M, Franz AM, Maleike D, Fangerau M, Baumhauer M, Maier-Hein L, Maier-Hein KH, Meinzer HP, Wolf I (2013) The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances. Int J Computer Assist Radiol Surg 8(4):607–620. doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0840-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rockwood C, Bucholz R, Green D, Court-Brown C, Heckman J, Tornetta P (2010) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. No. Bd. 1 in fractures in adults. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

  17. Siemens: Arcadis orbic 3d (10/27/2014). http://healthcare.siemens.de/surgical-c-arms-and-navigation/mobile-c-arms/arcadis-orbic-3d

  18. Viola P, Jones M (2001) Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001. vol 1, pp I-511–I-518 (2001). doi:10.1109/CVPR.2001.990517

  19. Von Recum J, Wendl K, Vock B, Grützner PA, Franke J (2012) Intraoperative 3d c-arm imaging: state of the art. Der Unfallchirurg 115(3):196–201. doi:10.1007/s00113-011-2119-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang A, Wang Z, Lv D, Fang Z (2010) Research on a novel non-rigid registration for medical image based on surf and apso. In: 3rd international congress on image and signal processing (CISP), 2010, vol 6, pp 2628–2633

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Brehler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Michael Brehler, Joseph Görres, Jochen Franke, Karl Barth, Sven Y. Vetter, Paul A. Grützner, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Ivo Wolf and Diana Nabers declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was partially funded by Siemens Healthcare, X-ray Products.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brehler, M., Görres, J., Franke, J. et al. Intra-operative adjustment of standard planes in C-arm CT image data. Int J CARS 11, 495–504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1281-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1281-3

Keywords

Navigation