Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shape–intensity prior level set combining probabilistic atlas and probability map constrains for automatic liver segmentation from abdominal CT images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Propose a fully automatic 3D segmentation framework to segment liver on challenging cases that contain the low contrast of adjacent organs and the presence of pathologies from abdominal CT images.

Methods

First, all of the atlases are weighted in the selected training datasets by calculating the similarities between the atlases and the test image to dynamically generate a subject-specific probabilistic atlas for the test image. The most likely liver region of the test image is further determined based on the generated atlas. A rough segmentation is obtained by a maximum a posteriori classification of probability map, and the final liver segmentation is produced by a shape–intensity prior level set in the most likely liver region. Our method is evaluated and demonstrated on 25 test CT datasets from our partner site, and its results are compared with two state-of-the-art liver segmentation methods. Moreover, our performance results on 10 MICCAI test datasets are submitted to the organizers for comparison with the other automatic algorithms.

Results

Using the 25 test CT datasets, average symmetric surface distance is \(1.09 \pm 0.34\) mm (range 0.62–2.12 mm), root mean square symmetric surface distance error is \(1.72 \pm 0.46\) mm (range 0.97–3.01 mm), and maximum symmetric surface distance error is \(18.04 \pm 3.51\) mm (range 12.73–26.67 mm) by our method. Our method on 10 MICCAI test data sets ranks 10th in all the 47 automatic algorithms on the site as of July 2015. Quantitative results, as well as qualitative comparisons of segmentations, indicate that our method is a promising tool to improve the efficiency of both techniques.

Conclusion

The applicability of the proposed method to some challenging clinical problems and the segmentation of the liver are demonstrated with good results on both quantitative and qualitative experimentations. This study suggests that the proposed framework can be good enough to replace the time-consuming and tedious slice-by-slice manual segmentation approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meinzer HP, Thorn M, Crdenas CE (2002) Computerized planning of liver surgery—an overview. Comput Graph 26(4):569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Masumoto J, Hori M, Sato Y, Murakami T, Johkoh T, Nakamura H, Tamura S (2003) Automated liver segmentation using multislice CT images. Syst Comput 34(9):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shiffman S, Rubin GD, Napel S (2000) Medical image segmentation using analysis of isolable-contour maps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 19(11):1064–1074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bae KT, Giger ML, Chen CT, Kahn CE Jr (1993) Automatic segmentation of liver structure in CT images. Med Phys 20(1):71–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruskó L, Bekes G, Fidrich M (2009) Automatic segmentation of the liver from multi- and single-phase contrast-enhanced CT images. Med Image Anal 13(6):871–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Selver MA, Kocaoǧlu A, Demir GK, Doanǧ H, Dicle O, Güzeliş C (2008) Patient oriented and robust automatic liver segmentation for pre-evaluation of liver transplantation. Comput Biol Med 38(7):765–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan TF, Vese LA (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(2):266–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Okada T, Shimada R, Hori M, Nakamoto M, Chen Y-W, Nakamura H, Sato Y (2008) Automated segmentation of the liver from 3D CT images using probabilistic atlas and multilevel statistical shape model. Acad Radiol 15(11):1390–1403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. So R, Chung A (2009) Multi-level non-rigid image registration using graph-cuts. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, 2009. ICASSP 2009. IEEE, pp 397–400

  10. Wimmer A, Soza G, Hornegger J (2009) A generic probabilistic active shape model for organ segmentation. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 26–33

  11. Chu C, Oda M, Kitasaka T, Misawa K, Fujiwara M, Hayashi Y, Wolz R, Rueckert D, Mori K (2013) Multi-organ segmentation from 3D abdominal CT images using patient-specific weighted-probabilistic atlas. In: SPIE medical imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 86693–86697

  12. Linguraru MG, Sandberg JK, Li Z, Pura JA, Summers RM (2009) Atlas-based automated segmentation of spleen and liver using adaptive enhancement estimation. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 1001–1008

  13. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J (1995) Active shape models-their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst 61(1):38–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park H, Bland PH, Meyer CR (2003) Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(4):483–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Okada T, Yokota K, Hori M, Nakamoto M, Nakamura H, Sato Y (2008) Construction of hierarchical multi-organ statistical atlases and their application to multi-organ segmentation from CT images. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 502–509

  16. Oda M, Nakaoka T, Kitasaka T, Furukawa K, Misawa K, Fujiwara M, Mori K (2012) Organ segmentation from 3D abdominal CT images based on atlas selection and graph cut. In: Abdominal Imaging. Computational and clinical applications. Springer, pp 181–188

  17. Shimizu A, Ohno R, Ikegami T, Kobatake H, Nawano S, Smutek D (2007) Segmentation of multiple organs in non-contrast 3D abdominal CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2(3–4):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wolz R, Chu C, Misawa K, Mori K, Rueckert D (2012) Multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation using hierarchically weighted subject-specific atlases. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 10–17

  19. Oliveira DA, Feitosa RQ, Correia MM (2011) Segmentation of liver, its vessels and lesions from CT images for surgical planning. Biomed Eng Online 10(1):30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang J, Duncan JS (2004) 3D image segmentation of deformable objects with joint shape–intensity prior models using level sets. Med Image Anal 8(3):285–294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Li BN, Chui CK, Chang S, Ong SH (2011) Integrating spatial fuzzy clustering with level set methods for automated medical image segmentation. Comput in Biol Med 41(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Linguraru MG, Richbourg WJ, Watt JM, Pamulapati V, Summers RM (2012) Liver and tumor segmentation and analysis from CT of diseased patients via a generic affine invariant shape parameterization and graph cuts. In: Abdominal imaging. Computational and clinical applications. Springer, pp 198–206

  23. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7):629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Ginneken B, Heimann T, Styner M (2007) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge. 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge, pp 7–15

  25. Chi Y, Zhou J, Venkatesh SK, Huang S, Tian Q, Hennedige T, Liu J (2013) Computer-aided focal liver lesion detection. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(4):511–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heimann T, Van Ginneken B, Styner M et al (2009) Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(8):1251–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou X, Kitagawa T, Hara T, Fujita H, Zhang X, Yokoyama R, Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Hoshi H (2006) Constructing a probabilistic model for automated liver region segmentation using non-contrast X-ray torso CT images. In: MICCAI. Springer, pp 856–863

  28. Li C, Wang X, Li J, Eberl S, Fulham M, Yin Y, Feng DD (2013) Joint probabilistic model of shape and intensity for multiple abdominal organ segmentation from volumetric CT images. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 17(1):92–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and help suggestions that greatly improved the papers quality. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61571158; the Scientific Research Fund of Heilongjiang Provincial Education Department (No. 12541164), and the Nature Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (No. F2015005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanzhi Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Cheng, Y., Guo, C. et al. Shape–intensity prior level set combining probabilistic atlas and probability map constrains for automatic liver segmentation from abdominal CT images. Int J CARS 11, 817–826 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1332-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1332-9

Keywords

Navigation