Skip to main content
Log in

Patient-individualized boundary conditions for CFD simulations using time-resolved 3D angiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Hemodynamic simulations are of increasing interest for the assessment of aneurysmal rupture risk and treatment planning. Achievement of accurate simulation results requires the usage of several patient-individual boundary conditions, such as a geometric model of the vasculature but also individualized inflow conditions.

Methods

We propose the automatic estimation of various parameters for boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based on a single 3D rotational angiography scan, also showing contrast agent inflow. First the data are reconstructed, and a patient-specific vessel model can be generated in the usual way. For this work, we optimize the inflow waveform based on two parameters, the mean velocity and pulsatility. We use statistical analysis of the measurable velocity distribution in the vessel segment to estimate the mean velocity. An iterative optimization scheme based on CFD and virtual angiography is utilized to estimate the inflow pulsatility. Furthermore, we present methods to automatically determine the heart rate and synchronize the inflow waveform to the patient’s heart beat, based on time–intensity curves extracted from the rotational angiogram. This will result in a patient-individualized inflow velocity curve.

Results

The proposed methods were evaluated on two clinical datasets. Based on the vascular geometries, synthetic rotational angiography data was generated to allow a quantitative validation of our approach against ground truth data. We observed an average error of approximately \(5.7\,\%\) for the mean velocity, \(7.1\,\%\) for the pulsatility. The heart rate was estimated very precisely with an average error of about \(0.8\,\%\), which corresponds to about 6 ms error for the duration of one cardiac cycle. Furthermore, a qualitative comparison of measured time–intensity curves from the real data and patient-specific simulated ones shows an excellent match.

Conclusion

The presented methods have the potential to accurately estimate patient-specific boundary conditions from a single dedicated rotational scan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bögel M, Hölter P, Redel T, Maier A, Hornegger J, Dörfler A. (2015) A fully-automatic locally adaptive thresholding algorithm for blood vessel segmentation in 3D digital subtraction angiography. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE, pp 2006–2009

  2. Bonnefous O, Pereira V, Ouared R, Brina O, Aerts H, Hermans R, van Nijnatten F, Stawiaski J, Ruijters D (2012) Quantification of arterial flow using digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys 39(10):6264–6275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cebral JR, Radaelli A, Frangi A, Putman CM (2007) Qualitative comparison of intra-aneurysmal flow structures determined from conventional and virtual angiograms. In: Medical imaging, pp 65,111E–65,111E. International Society for Optics and Photonics

  4. Davis B, Royalty K, Kowarschik M, Rohkohl C, Oberstar E, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Niemann D, Ozkan O, Strother C, Mistretta C (2013) 4D digital subtraction angiography: implementation and demonstration of feasibility. Am J Neuroradiol 34(10):1914–1921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Durant J, Waechter I, Hermans R, Weese J, Aach T (2008) Toward quantitative virtual angiography: evaluation with in vitro studies. In: Biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, 2008. ISBI 2008. 5th IEEE international symposium on, pp 632–635

  6. Endres J, Kowarschik M, Redel T, Sharma P, Mihalef V, Hornegger J, Dörfler A (2012) A workflow for patient-individualized virtual angiogram generation based on CFD simulation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012(306765):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Endres J, Redel T, Kowarschik M, Hutter J, Hornegger J, Dörfler A (2012) Virtual angiography using CFD simulations based on patient-specific parameter optimization. In: IEEE (ed.) International symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI), pp 1200–1203

  8. Endres J, Rohkohl C, Schafer S, Royalty K, Maier A, Kowarschik M, Hornegger J (2015) 4D DSA iterative reconstruction. In: King M, Glick S, Mueller K (eds) Proceedings of the fully3D, pp 276–279

  9. Ford MD, Stuhne GR, Nikolov HN, Habets DF, Lownie SP, Holdsworth DW, Steinman D (2005) Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics. Med Imaging, IEEE Trans 24(12):1586–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gülsün M, Tek H (2008) Robust vessel tree modeling. In: Ayache N, Delingette H, Golland P, Mori K (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 602–611

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang T, Wu T, Lin C, Mok G, Guo W (2012) Peritherapeutic quantitative flow analysis of arteriovenous malformation on digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Surg 56(3):812–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karmonik C, Klucnik R, Benndorf G (2008) Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics-preliminary experience. Rofo 180(3):209–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun Q, Groth A, Bertram M, Waechter I, Bruijns T, Hermans R, Aach T (2010) Phantom-based experimental validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations on cerebral aneurysms. Med Phys 37(9):5054–5065

  14. Sun Q, Groth A, Waechter I, Brina O, Weese J, Aach T (2009) Quantitative evaluation of virtual angiography for interventional X-ray acquisitions. In: 2009 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro: [ISBI ’09], IEEE, 2009, Boston, pp 895–898

  15. Wächter I, Bredno J, Hermans R, Weese J, Barrat D, Hawkes D (2008) Model-based blood flow quantification from rotational angiography. Med Image Anal 12(5):586–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding of the Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the framework of the German excellence initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Boegel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Gehrisch, T. Redel and M. Kowarschik are employees of Siemens Healthcare GmbH.

Ethical approval

This study has been performed retrospectively. Formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Disclaimer The concepts and information presented in this paper are based on research and are not commercially available.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boegel, M., Gehrisch, S., Redel, T. et al. Patient-individualized boundary conditions for CFD simulations using time-resolved 3D angiography. Int J CARS 11, 1061–1069 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1367-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1367-6

Keywords

Navigation