Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Principal components of wrist circumduction from electromagnetic surgical tracking

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

An electromagnetic (EM) surgical tracking system was used for a functionally calibrated kinematic analysis of wrist motion. Circumduction motions were tested for differences in subject gender and for differences in the sense of the circumduction as clockwise or counter-clockwise motion.

Methods

Twenty subjects were instrumented for EM tracking. Flexion–extension motion was used to identify the functional axis. Subjects performed unconstrained wrist circumduction in a clockwise and counter-clockwise sense. Data were decomposed into orthogonal flexion–extension motions and radial–ulnar deviation motions. PCA was used to concisely represent motions. Nonparametric Wilcoxon tests were used to distinguish the groups.

Results

Flexion–extension motions were projected onto a direction axis with a root-mean-square error of \(5^\circ \). Using the first three principal components, there was no statistically significant difference in gender (all \(p>0.20\)). For motion sense, radial–ulnar deviation distinguished the sense of circumduction in the first principal component (\(p<0.03\)) and in the third principal component (\(p<0.01\)); flexion–extension distinguished the sense in the second principal component (\(p<0.01\)).

Conclusion

The clockwise sense of circumduction could be distinguished by a multifactorial combination of components; there were no gender differences in this small population. These data constitute a baseline for normal wrist circumduction. The multifactorial PCA findings suggest that a higher-dimensional method, such as manifold analysis, may be a more concise way of representing circumduction in human joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ungi T, Gauvin G, Lasso A, Yeo C, Pezeshki P, Vaughan T, Carter K, Rudan J, Engel C, Fichtinger G (2016) Navigated breast tumor excision using electromagnetically tracked ultrasound and surgical instruments. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2016. Epub ahead of print

  2. Lugez E, Sadjadi H, Pichora DR, Ellis RE, Akl SG, Fichtinger G (2015) Electromagnetic tracking in surgical and interventional environments: usability study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(3):253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Werner FW, Short WH, Fortino MD, Palmer AK (1997) The relative contribution of selected carpal bones to global wrist motion during simulated planar and out-of-plane wrist motion. J Hand Surg (Am Vol) 22(4):708–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Salvà-Coll G, Garcia-Elias M, Lulsá-Pérez M, Rodríguez-Baeza A (2011) The role of the flexor carpi radialis muscle in scapholunate instability. J Hand Surg (Am Vol) 36(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yaniv Z, Wilson E, Lindisch D, Cleary K (2009) Electromagnetic tracking in the clinical environment. Med Phys 36(3):876–892

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson E, Yaniv Z, Zhang H, Nafis C, Shen E, Shechter G, Wiles AD, Peters T, Lindisch D, Cleary K (2007) A hardware and software protocol for the evaluation of electromagnetic tracker accuracy in the clinical environment: a multi-center study. Med Imag 6509(65092T)

  7. Rainbow MJ, Wolff AL, Crisco JJ, Wolfe SW (2016) Functional kinematics of the wrist. J Hand Surg (Eur Vol) 41(1):7–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cappozzo A, Catani F, Croce UD, Leardini A (1995) Position and orientation in space of bones: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 10(4):171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deluzio KJ, Astephen JL (2006) Biomechanical features of gait waveform data associated with knee osteoarthritis: an application of principal component analysis. Gait Posture 25(1):86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillstrom HJ, Garg R, Kraszewski A, Lenhoff M, Carter T, Backus SI, Wolff A, Syrkin G, Cheng R, Wolfe S (2014) Development of an anatomical wrist joint coordinate system to quantify motion during functional tasks. J Appl Biomech 30(4):586–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu G, van der Helm FC, Veeger HD, Makhsous M, Roy PV, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade K, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motionpart ii: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38(5):981–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Vries WHK, Veeger HEJ, Cutti AG, Baten C, van der Helm FCT (2010) Functionally interpretable local coordinate systems for the upper extremity using inertial & magnetic measurement systems. J Biomech 43(10):1983–1988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Favre J, Aissaoui R, Jolles BM, de Guise JA, Aminian K (2009) Functional calibration procedure for 3D knee joint angle description using inertial sensors. J Biomech 42(14):2330–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krazewski AP, Osei DA, Garg R, Jang E, Hillstrom HJ, Lenhoff MW, Wolfe SW (2015) The effect of wrist surgery on the kinematic consistency of joint axis reconstruction in a static posture. J Orthop Res 33(9):1341–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maier-Hein L, Franz AM, Birkfellner W, Hummel J, Gergel I, Wegner I, Meinzer H-P (2012) Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting. Med Phys 39:3424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amaral GJA, Dryden IL, Wood ATA (2007) Pivotal bootstrap methods for k-sample problems in directional statistics and shape analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 102(478):695–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shoemake K (1985) Animating rotation with quaternion curves. Comput Graph 19(3):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh HP, Brinkhorst ME, Dias JJ, Moojen T, Hovius S, Bhowal B (2014) Dynamic assessment of wrist after proximal row carpectomy and 4-corner fusion. J Hand Surg Am 39(12):2424–2433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeBottis DP, Werner FW, Sutton LG, Harley BJ (2013) 4-corner arthrodesis and proximal row carpectomy: a biomechanical comparison of wrist motion and tendon forces. J Hand Surg (Am Vol) 38(5):893–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rainbow MJ, Crisco JJ, Moore DC, Wolfe SW (2008) Gender differences in capitate kinematics are eliminated after accounting for variation in carpal size. J Biomech Eng 130(4):041003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, Cappozzo A (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21(2):212–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toxopeus CM, De Jong BM, Valsan G, Conway BA, van der Hoeven JH, Leenders KL, Maurits NM (2011) Impairment of gradual muscle adjustment during wrist circumduction in Parkinson’s disease. PloS one 6(9):24572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Small CF, Ellis RE, Bryant JT, Dwosh IL, Pichora DR, Zee B (1997) Configuration-space analysis of the rheumatoid wrist. Hum Motion Anal 16:309–322

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported in part by: the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Grant #CHRPJ-398995; the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Grant #DG-43515; and the Southeastern Ontario Academic Medical Organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. Rasquinha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasquinha, B.J., Rainbow, M.J., Zec, M.L. et al. Principal components of wrist circumduction from electromagnetic surgical tracking. Int J CARS 12, 315–324 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1460-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1460-x

Keywords

Navigation