Skip to main content
Log in

Deep learning-based digital subtraction angiography image generation

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is a powerful technique for diagnosing cardiovascular disease. In order to avoid image artifacts caused by patient movement during imaging, we take deep learning-based methods to generate DSA image from single live image without the mask image.

Methods

Conventional clinical DSA datasets are acquired with a standard injection protocol. More than 600 sequences obtained from more than 100 subjects were used for head and leg experiments. Here, the residual dense block (RDB) is adopted to generate DSA image from single live image directly, and RDBs can extract high-level features by dense connected layers. To obtain better vessel details, a supervised generative adversarial network strategy is also used in the training stage.

Results

The human head and leg experiments show that the deep learning methods can generate DSA image from single live image, and our method can do better than other models. Specifically, the DSA image generating with our method contains less artifact and is suitable for diagnosis. We use metrics including PSNR, SSIM and FSIM, which can reach 23.731, 0.877 and 0.8946 on the head dataset and 26.555, 0.870 and 0.9284 on the leg dataset.

Conclusions

The experiment results show the model can extract the vessels from the single live image, thus avoiding the image artifacts obtained by subtracting the live image and the mask image. And our method has a better performance than other methods we have tried on this task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyde DE, Fox AJ, Gulka I, Kalapos P, Lee DH, Pelz DM, Holdsworth DW (2004) Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 35(12):2776–2781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buzug TM, Weese J (1998) Image registration for DSA quality enhancement. Comput Med Imaging Gr 22(2):103–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang X, Zhang F, Li R (2010) DSA image registration based on 3D space-time detection. Proc Eng 7:426–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meijering EH, Zuiderveld KJ, Viergever MA (1999) Image registration for digital subtraction angiography. Int J Comput Vis 31(2–3):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hipwell JH, Penney GP, McLaughlin RA, Rhode K, Summers P, Cox TC, Byrne JV, Noble JA, Hawkes DJ (2003) Intensity-based 2-D-3-D registration of cerebral angiograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(11):1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundarapandian M, Kalpathi R, Manason VD (2013) DSA image registration using non-uniform MRF model and pivotal control points. Comput Med Imaging Gr 37(4):323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sulayman N, Al-Mawaldi M, Kanafani Q (2016) Semi-automatic detection and segmentation algorithm of saccular aneurysms in 2D cerebral DSA images. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 47(3):859–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Litjens G, Kooi T, Bejnordi BE, Setio AAA, Ciompi F, Ghafoorian M, Van Der Laak JA, Van Ginneken B, Sánchez CI (2017) A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Image Anal 42:60–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenspan H, Van Ginneken B, Summers RM (2016) Guest editorial deep learning in medical imaging: overview and future promise of an exciting new technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(5):1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen D, Wu G, Suk H-I (2017) Deep learning in medical image analysis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 19:221–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 3431–3440

  12. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 234–241

  13. Montoya JC, Li Y, Strother C, Chen G-H (2018) Deep learning angiography (DLA): three-dimensional C-arm cone beam CT angiography generated from deep learning method using a convolutional neural network. In: Medical imaging 2018: physics of medical imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, p 105731N

  14. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, Bengio Y (2014) Generative adversarial nets. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 2672–2680

  15. Yu P, Song K, Lu J (2018) Generating adversarial examples with conditional generative adversarial net. In: 2018 24th International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR). IEEE, pp 676–681

  16. Nie D, Cao X, Gao Y, Wang L, Shen D (2016) Estimating CT image from MRI data using 3D fully convolutional networks. In: Deep learning and data labeling for medical applications. Springer, pp 170–178

  17. Nie D, Trullo R, Lian J, Wang L, Petitjean C, Ruan S, Wang Q, Shen D (2018) Medical image synthesis with deep convolutional adversarial networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 65(12):2720–2730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han X (2017) MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method. Med Phys 44(4):1408–1419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiang L, Wang Q, Nie D, Zhang L, Jin X, Qiao Y, Shen D (2018) Deep embedding convolutional neural network for synthesizing CT image from T1-weighted MR image. Med Image Anal 47:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Song T, Song Y, Wang Y, Huang X (2018) Residual network with dense block. J Electron Imaging 27(5):053036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee D, Yoo J, Tak S, Ye JC (2018) Deep residual learning for accelerated MRI using magnitude and phase networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 65(9):1985–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao Y, Wu Z, Shen C (2017) Estimating depth from monocular images as classification using deep fully convolutional residual networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 28(11):3174–3182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ (2017) Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 4700–4708

  24. Zhang Y, Tian Y, Kong Y, Zhong B, Fu Y (2018) Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 2472–2481

  25. Yi Z, Zhang H, Tan P, Gong M (2017) Dualgan: unsupervised dual learning for image-to-image translation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 2849–2857

  26. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang L, Zhang L, Mou X, Zhang D (2011) FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(8):2378–2386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP (2010) Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(1):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan under Grant 2017YFA0104302, Grant 2017YFC0109202 and 2017YFC0107900, the National Natural Science Foundation under Grant 81530060 and 61871117.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yang Chen or Wanyin Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Ethical statements

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Ethical Standards of the Medical University of Warsaw and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Song, Y., Yin, X. et al. Deep learning-based digital subtraction angiography image generation. Int J CARS 14, 1775–1784 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-02040-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-02040-x

Keywords

Navigation