Skip to main content
Log in

A tactile sensor using the acoustic reflection principle for assessing the contact force component in laparoscopic tumor localization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Localization of an early stage gastric tumor is easily performed in conventional open surgery, whereas it is a difficult procedure in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). A tactile sensor could allow precise resection of the tumor in laparoscopic surgery. The safety of medical tools should be ensured in MIS. Moreover, boundary conditions such as a double-ended beam without a supporting rigid base during tissue palpation were hardly considered. Thus, we suppose that it is informative to assess the normal force and shear force for practical tumor detection considering the boundary condition.

Methods

In this study, a tactile sensor with normal and shear force measurement functions using the acoustic reflection principle was developed for gastric tumor detection in MIS. The developed tactile sensor was tested using an artificial phantom of the stomach without a supporting rigid base to evaluate the force response of the sensor in intraoperative tumor localization.

Results

The developed sensor is safe for human tissue and can be sterilized. The experimental results show that the developed tactile sensor has the capability to measure normal and shear forces. In the gastric tumor detection test, the shear force of the sensor was more stable and highly responsive to the tumor position than the normal force, which is greatly affected by the bending of the tissue during the operation.

Conclusions

A two-axis tactile sensor using the acoustic reflection principle was assembled for tissue palpation in MIS. The results showed that the developed sensor is suitable for tumor detection, indicating that the shear force information of the developed sensor is more useful in MIS for early stage gastric tumor localization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson TN, Stiegmann GV (2004) Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy 36(1):48–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lederman S, Klatzky R (1999) Sensing and displaying spatially distributed fingertip forces in haptic interfaces for teleoperator and virtual environment systems. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 8(1):86–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyt K, Castaneda B, Zhang M, Nigwekar P, di Sant’agnese PA, Joseph JV, Strang J, Rubens DJ, Parker KJ (2008) Tissue elasticity properties as biomarkers for prostate cancer. Cancer Biomark 4(4–5):213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T (1998) Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 20(4):260–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gwilliam JC, Pezzementi Z, Jantho E, Okamura AM, Hsiao S (2010) Human vs. robotic tactile sensing: detecting lumps in soft tissue. IEEE Haptics Symposium, pp 21–28

  6. Xie H, Liu H, Seneviratne LD, Althoefer K (2014) An optical tactile array probe head for tissue palpation during minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Sens J 14(9):3283–3291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Puangmali P, Liu H, Seneviratne LD, Dasgupta P, Althoefer K (2012) Miniature 3-axis distal force sensor for minimally invasive surgical palpation. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 17(4):646–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lv C, Wang S, Shi C (2020) A high-precision and miniature fiber bragg grating-based force sensor for tissue palpation during minimally invasive surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 48(2):669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Omata S, Murayama Y, Constantinou CE (2004) Real time robotic tactile sensor system for the determination of the physical properties of biomaterials. Sens Actuators A Phys 112(2–3):278–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim U, Kim YB, Seok DY, So J, Choi HR (2018) A surgical palpation probe with 6-axis force/torque sensing capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(3):2755–2765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramakrishna S, Tian L, Wang C, Liao S, Teo WE (2015) Medical devices regulations, standards and practices. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 137–153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fish RM, Geddes LA (2009) Conduction of electrical current to and through the human body: a review. Eplasty 9:e44

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Trejos AL, Patel RV, Naish MD (2010) Force sensing and its application in minimally invasive surgery: a survey. Proc Inst Mech Eng J Mech Eng Sci 224(7):1435–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka Y, Fukuda T, Fujiwara M, Sano A (2015) Tactile sensor using acoustic reflection for lump detection in laparoscopic surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(2):183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Konstantinova J, Cotugno G, Dasgupta P, Althoefer K, Nanayakkara T (2017) Palpation force modulation strategies to identify hard regions in soft tissue organs. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0171706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim H, Choi S, Chung WK (2015) Feasibility of a novel indicator for lump detection using contact pressure distribution. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on robots and systems, pp 2111–2117

  17. Du WY (2014) Resistive capacitive inductive and magnetic sensor technologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukuda T, Tanaka Y, Kappers AML, Fujiwara M, Sano A (2018) Visual and tactile feedback for a direct manipulating tactile sensor in laparoscopic palpation. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 14(2):e1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuda T, Tanaka Y, Kappers AML, Fujiwara M, Sano A (2018) A pneumatic tactile ring for instantaneous sensory feedback in laparoscopic tumor localization. IEEE Trans Haptics 11(4):485–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lazeroms M, Villavicencio G, Jongkind W, Honderd G (1996) Optical fibre force sensor for minimal invasive surgery grasping instruments. In: Proceedings of the international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 234–235

  22. McCreery GL, Trejos AL, Naish MD, Patel RV, Malthaner RA (2008) Feasibility of locating tumours in lung via kinaesthetic feedback. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4:58–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Akita S, Fukuda T, Tanaka Y, Kappers AML, Fujiwara M, Sano A (2018) Frequency-based temperature compensation for a tactile sensor using acoustic reflection. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(4):3529–3536

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI, Grant numbers JP19J23169 and JP17H01252.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiep Hoang Ly.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

This article does not contain patient data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ly, H.H., Tanaka, Y. & Fujiwara, M. A tactile sensor using the acoustic reflection principle for assessing the contact force component in laparoscopic tumor localization. Int J CARS 16, 289–299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02294-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02294-w

Keywords

Navigation