Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound-guided needle insertion robotic system for percutaneous puncture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous puncture technology can realize real-time, minimally invasive interventional therapy without radiation. The location accuracy of the puncture needle directly determines the precision and safety of the operation. It is a challenge for novices and young surgeons to perform a free-hand puncture guided by the ultrasound images to achieve the desired accuracy. This work aims to develop a robotic system to assist surgeons to perform percutaneous punctures with high precision.

Methods

An US-guided puncture robot was designed to allow the mounting and control of the needle to achieve localization and insertion. The US probe fitted within the puncture robot was held by a passive arm. Moreover, the puncture robot was calibrated with a novel calibration method to achieve coordinate transformation between the robot and the US image. The system allowed the operators to plan the puncture target and puncture path on US images, and the robot performed needle insertion automatically. Five groups of puncture experiments were performed to verify the validity and accuracy of the proposed robotic system.

Results

Assisted by the robotic system, the positioning and orientation accuracies of the needle insertion were 0.9 ± 0.29 mm and 0.76 ± 0.34°, respectively. These are improved compared with the results obtained with the free-hand puncture (1.82 ± 0.51 mm and 2.79 ± 1.32°, respectively). Moreover, the proposed robotic system can reduce the operation time and number of needle insertions (14.28 ± 3.21 s and one needle insertion, respectively), compared with the free-hand puncture (25.14 ± 6.09 s and 1.96 ± 0.68 needle insertions, respectively).

Conclusion

A robotic system for percutaneous puncture guided by US images was developed and demonstrated. The experimental results indicate that the proposed system is accurate and feasible. It can assist novices and young surgeons to perform the puncture operation with increased accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soni NJ, Franco-Sadud R, Schnobrich D, Dancel R, Tierney DM, Salame G, Restrepo MI, McHardy P (2016) Ultrasound guidance for lumbar puncture. Neurol Clin Pract 6(4):358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahmoud MZ, Aslam M, Alsaadi M, Fagiri MA, Alonazi B (2019) Evolution of Robot-assisted ultrasound-guided breast biopsy systems. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 11(1):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Priester A, Natarajan S, Culjat M (2013) Robotic ultrasound systems in medicine. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 60(3):507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boctor EM, Choti MA, Burdette EC, Webster IRJ (2008) Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided robotic needle placement: an experimental evaluation. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4(2):180–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rousseau F, Hellier P, Barillot C (2005) Confhusius: a robust and fully automatic calibration method for 3D freehand ultrasound. Med Image Anal 9(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hemmerling TM, Taddei R, Wehbe M, Cyr S, Zaouter C, Morse J (2013) First robotic ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in humans using the Magellan system. Anesth Analg 116(2):491–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morse J, Terrasini N, Wehbe M, Philippona C, Zaouter C, Cyr S, Hemmerling TM (2014) Comparison of success rates, learning curves, and inter-subject performance variability of robot-assisted and manual ultrasound-guided nerve block needle guidance in simulation. Br J Anaesth 112(6):1092–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Neubach Z, Shoham M (2010) Ultrasound-guided robot for flexible needle steering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(4):799–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chevrie J, Shahriari N, Babel M, Krupa A, Misra S (2018) Flexible needle steering in moving biological tissue with motion compensation using ultrasound and force feedback. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(3):2338–2345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu J, Jia ZZ, Song ZJ, Yang XD, Chen K, Liang P (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound image-guided robotic system for accurate microwave coagulation of malignant liver tumours. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 6(3):256–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang Q, Bian GB, Duan X, Zhao HH, Liang P (2010) An ultrasound-directed robotic system for microwave ablation of liver cancer. Robotica 28(2):209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kojcev R, Fuerst B, Zettinig O, Fotouhi J, Lee SC, Frisch B, Taylor R, Sinibaldi E, Navab N (2016) Dual-robot ultrasound-guided needle placement: closing the planning-imaging-action loop. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(6):1173–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobayashi Y, Hong J, Hamano R, Okada K, Fujie M, Hashizume M (2012) Development of a needle insertion manipulator for central venous catheterization. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 8(1):34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abayazid M, Vrooijink GJ, Patil S, Alterovitz R, Misra S (2014) Experimental evaluation of ultrasound-guided 3D needle steering in biological tissue. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(6):931–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim S, Jun C, Chang D, Petrisor D, Han M, Stoianovici D (2019) Robotic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 66(9):2527–2537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim C, Chang D, Petrisor D, Chirikjian G, Han M, Stoianovici D (2013) Ultrasound probe and needle-guide calibration for robotic ultrasound scanning and needle targeting. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(6):1728–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abayazid M, Moreira P, Shahriari N, Patil S, Alteroviz R, Misra S (2014) Ultrasound-guided three-dimensional needle steering in biological tissue with curved surfaces. Med Eng Phys 37(1):145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Balter M, Chen A, Maguire T, Yarmush M (2017) Adaptive kinematic control of a robotic venipuncture device based on stereo vision, ultrasound, and force guidance. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(1):1626–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Esteban J, Simson W, Requena Witzig S, Rienmüller A, Virga S, Frisch B, Zettinig O, Sakara D, Ryang Y, Navab N, Hennersperger C (2018) Robotic ultrasound-guided facet joint insertion. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13(1):895–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ashrafian H, Clancy O, Grover V, Darzi A (2017) The evolution of robotic surgery: surgical and anaesthetic aspects. Br J Anaesth 119(suppl_1):i72–i84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Strid JMC, Sauter AR, Ullensvang K, Andersen MN, Daugaard M, Bendtsen MAF, Søballe K, Pedersen EM, Børglum J, Bendtsen T (2017) Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in volunteers; a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 118(3):430–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stoianovici D, Jun C, Lim S, Li P, Petrisor D, Fricke ST, Sharma K, Cleary K (2018) Multi-imager compatible, MR safe, remote center of motion needle-guide robot. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 65(1):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shin WH, Kwon DS (2013) Surgical robot system for single-port surgery with novel joint mechanism. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(4):937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi H, Kwak HS, Lim YA, Kim HJ (2014) Surgical robot for single-incision laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(9):2458–2466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zettinig O, Frisch B, Virga S, Esposito M, Rienmüller A, Meyer B, Hennersperger C, Ryang Y, Navab N (2017) 3D ultrasound registration-based visual servoing for neurosurgical navigation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:1607–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, Kirchmair L (2010) Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1. Br J Anaesth 104(5):538–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Donnell BD, O’Sullivan O, Gallagher AG, Shorten GD (2015) Robotic assistance with needle guidance. Br J Anaesth 114(4):708–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51575343).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanping Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animals rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No animal experiments were performed in this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S., Wang, F., Lin, Y. et al. Ultrasound-guided needle insertion robotic system for percutaneous puncture. Int J CARS 16, 475–484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02300-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02300-1

Keywords

Navigation