Skip to main content
Log in

Database-driven patient-specific registration error compensation method for image-guided laparoscopic surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A surgical navigation system helps surgeons understand anatomical structures in the operative field during surgery. Patient-to-image registration, which aligns coordinate systems between the CT volume and a positional tracker, is vital for accurate surgical navigation. Although a point-based rigid registration method using fiducials on the body surface is often utilized for laparoscopic surgery navigation, precise registration is difficult due to such factors as soft tissue deformation. We propose a method that compensates a transformation matrix computed using fiducials on the body surface based on the analysis of positional information in the database.

Methods

We built our database by measuring the positional information of the fiducials and the guidance targets in both the CT volume and positional tracker coordinate systems through previous surgeries. We computed two transformation matrices: using only the fiducials and using only the guidance targets in all the data in the database. We calculated the differences between the two transformation matrices in each piece of data. The compensation transformation matrix was computed by averaging these difference matrices. In this step, we selected the data from the database based on the similarity of the fiducials and the configuration of the guidance targets.

Results

We evaluated our proposed method using 20 pieces of data acquired during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The locations of blood vessels were used as guidance targets for computing target registration error. The mean target registration errors significantly decreased from 33.0 to 17.1 mm before and after the compensation.

Conclusion

This paper described a registration error compensation method using a database for image-guided laparoscopic surgery. Since our proposed method reduced registration error without additional intraoperative measurements during surgery, it increases the accuracy of surgical navigation for laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2011) Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 20:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2011.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernhardt S, Nicolau SA, Soler L, Doignon C (2017) The status of augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery as of 2016. Med Image Anal 37:66–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.01.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mårvik R, Langø T, Tangen GA, Andersen JO, Kaspersen JH, Ystgaard B, Sjølie E, Fougner R, Fjøsne HE, Nagelhus Hernes TA (2004) Laparoscopic navigation pointer for three-dimensional image-guided surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1242–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9190-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hayashi Y, Misawa K, Oda M, Hawkes DJ, Mori K (2016) Clinical application of a surgical navigation system based on virtual laparoscopy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:827–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1293-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vijayan S, Reinertsen I, Hofstad EF, Rethy A, Hernes TA, Langø T (2014) Liver deformation in an animal model due to pneumoperitoneum assessed by a vessel-based deformable registration. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 23:279–286. https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2014.914955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsutsumi N, Tomikawa M, Uemura M, Akahoshi T, Nagao Y, Konishi K, Ieiri S, Hong J, Maehara Y, Hashizume M (2013) Image-guided laparoscopic surgery in an open MRI operating theater. Surg Endosc 27:2178–2184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2737-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mountney P, Fallert, J, Nicolau S, Soler L, Mewes PW (2014) An augmented reality framework for soft tissue surgery. In: Golland P, Hata N, Barillot C, Hornegger J, Howe R (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - MICCAI 2014. LNCS, vol 8673, Springer, Cham, pp 423–31 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_53

  8. Teatini A, Pelanis E, Aghayan DL, Kumar RP, Palomar R, Fretland ÅA, Edwin B, Elle OJ (2019) The effect of intraoperative imaging on surgical navigation for laparoscopic liver resection surgery. Sci Rep 9:18687. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-019-54915-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelanis E, Teatini A, Eigl B, Regensburger A, Alzaga A, Kumar RP, Rudolph T, Aghayan DL, Riediger C, Kvarnström N, Elle OJ, Edwin B (2020) Evaluation of a novel navigation platform for laparoscopic liver surgery with organ deformation compensation using injected fiducials. Med Image Anal 69:101946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ieiri S, Uemura M, Konishi K, Souzaki R, Nagao Y, Tsutsumi N, Akahoshi T, Ohuchida K, Ohdaira T, Tomikawa M, Tanoue K, Hashizume M, Taguchi T (2012) Augmented reality navigation system for laparoscopic splenectomy in children based on preoperative CT image using optical tracking device. Pediatr Surg Int 28:341–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-3034-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song Y, Totz J, Thompson S, Johnsen S, Barratt D, Schneider C, Gurusamy K, Davidson B, Ourselin S, Hawkes D, Clarkson MJ (2015) Locally rigid, vessel-based registration for laparoscopic liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:1951–1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1236-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi Y, Misawa K, Hawkes DJ, Mori K (2016) Progressive internal landmark registration for surgical navigation in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11:837–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1346-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma L, Wang J, Kiyomatsu H, Tsukihara H, Sakuma I, Kobayashi E (2021) Surgical navigation system for laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer surgery using laparoscopic-vision-tracked ultrasonic imaging. Surg Endosc 35:6556–6567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08153-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nabavi A, Gering DT, Kacher DF, Talos IF, Wells WM, Kikinis R, Black PM, Jolesz FA (2003) Surgical navigation in the open MRI. Acta Neurochir Suppl 85:121–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6043-5_17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cash DM, Miga MI, Sinha TK, Galloway RL, Chapman WC (2005) Compensating for intraoperative soft-tissue deformations using incomplete surface data and finite elements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:1479–1491. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2005.855434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Espinel Y, Calvet L, Botros K, Buc E, Tilmant C, Bartoli A (2021) Using multiple images and contours for deformable 3D-2D registration of a preoperative CT in laparoscopic liver surgery. In: de Bruijne M, Cattin PC, Cotin S, Padoy N, Speidel S, Zheng Y, Essert C (eds) Medical image computing and computer assisted intervention – MICCAI 2021, LNCS, vol 12904, Springer, Cham, pp 657–666, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_63

  17. François T, Calvet L, Sève-d’Erceville C, Bourdel N, Bartoli A (2021) Image-based incision detection for topological intraoperative 3D model update in augmented reality assisted laparoscopic surgery. In: de Bruijne M, Cattin PC, Cotin S, Padoy N, Speidel S, Zheng Y, Essert C (eds) Medical image computing and computer assisted intervention – MICCAI 2021, LNCS, vol 12904, Springer, Cham. pp 647–656, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_62

  18. Koo B, Robu MR, Allam M, Pfeiffer M, Thompson S, Gurusamy K, Davidson B, Speidel S, Hawkes D, Stoyanov D, Clarkson MJ (2022) Automatic, global registration in laparoscopic liver surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 17:167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02518-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamoto M, Shiono H, Sawa Y, Sato Y (2008) Registration of the trachea using skin surface matching and statistical bias correction for computer assisted mediastinoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3:S114–S116

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnsen SF, Thompson S, Clarkson MJ, Modat M, Song Y, Totz J, Gurusamy K, Davidson B, Taylor ZA, Hawkes DJ, Ourselin S (2015) Database-based estimation of liver deformation under pneumoperitoneum for surgical image-guidance and simulation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention – MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol 9350, Springer, Cham, pp 450–458

  21. Fitzpatrick JM, Hill DLG, Maurer CR Jr (2000) Image registration. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick JM (eds) Handbook of medical imaging, vol 2. Medical image processing and analysis. SPIE, Bellingham, pp 447–513

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gramkow C (2001) On averaging rotations. J Math Imaging Vis 15:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Misawa K, Kinoshita M, Kinoshita T, Miura S, Ohashi N, Nakayama G, Koike M, Nakao A (2008) Longterm outcomes of early-stage gastric carcinoma patients treated with laparoscopy-assisted surgery. J Am Coll Surg 206:138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee SW, Shinohara H, Matsuki M, Okuda J, Nomura E, Mabuchi H, Nishiguchi K, Takaori K, Narabayashi I, Tanigawa N (2003) Preoperative simulation of vascular anatomy by three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg 197:927–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.07.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Iino I, Sakaguchi T, Kikuchi H, Miyazaki S, Fujita T, Hiramatsu Y, Ohta M, Kamiya K, Ushio T, Takehara Y, Konno H (2013) Usefulness of three-dimensional angiographic analysis of perigastric vessels before laparoscopic gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 16:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0194-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank our colleagues for their suggestions and advice. This work was supported in part by AMED Grant No. JP16ck0106036, JST CREST Grant No. JPMJCR20D5, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. JP26108006 and JP17H00867.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuichiro Hayashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Aichi Cancer Center.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi, Y., Misawa, K. & Mori, K. Database-driven patient-specific registration error compensation method for image-guided laparoscopic surgery. Int J CARS 18, 63–69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02804-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02804-y

Keywords

Navigation