Skip to main content
Log in

Meinung/Dialog

  • WI - Aktuell
  • Published:
WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ehn, P.: Seven “classical” questions about Human Centered Design, position statement to the NSF workshop on human-centered systems: Information, Interactivity, and Intelligence (HCS), February 17–19, 1997, Arlington, VA. http://www.ifp.uiuc.edu/nsfhcs/abstracts/ehn.txt, retrieved 2007-07-08.

  2. Groat, L.; Wang, D.: Architectural Research Methods. Wiley, New York.

  3. Robey, D.; Markus, M. L.: Beyond rigor and relevance: Producing consumable research about information systems. In: Information Resources Management Journal 11 (1998) 1, pp. 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vaishnavi, V. K.; Buchanan, G. C.; Kuechler, W. L.: A data/knowledge paradigm for the modeling and design of operations support systems. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering 9 (1997) 2, pp. 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walls, J. G.; Widmeyer, G. R.; El Sawy, O. A.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. In: Information Systems Research 3 (1992) 1, pp. 36–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Frank, U.: Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Research Methods in Information Systems Research. ICB Research Report No. 7, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 2006.

  2. Hevner, A. R.; March, S. T.; Park, J.; Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. In: MIS Quarterly 28 (2004) 1, pp. 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lyytinen, K.; King, J. L.: Nothing At The Center?: Academic Legitimacy in the Information Systems Field. In: Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (2004) 6, pp. 220–246.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kavan, C. B.: Profit through knowledge: The application of academic research to information technology. In: Information Resources Management Journal 11 (1998) 1, p. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCloskey, D. N.: The Rhetoric of Economics. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schauer, C.: Relevance and Success of IS Teaching and Research: an Analysis of the “Relevance Debate”. ICB Research Report No. 19, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 2007.

References

  1. Stokes, D.: Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Benbasat, I.; Zmud, R.: Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. In: MIS Quarterly 23 (1999) 1, pp. 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cranefield, J.; Yoong, P.: To Whom Should Information Systems Research Be Relevant: The Case for an Ecological Perspective. In: Österle, H.; Schelp, J.; Winter, R. (eds.): Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2007, on CD), St Gallen, Switzerland, 7–9 June 2007, pp. 1313–1324.

  3. Mårtensson, A.; Mårtensson, P.: Extending Rigor and Relevance: Towards Credible, Contributory and Communicable Research. In: Österle, H.; Schelp, J.; Winter, R. (eds.): Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2007, on CD), St. Gallen, Switzerland, 7–9 June 2007, pp. 1325–1333.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winter, R., Baskerville, R., Frank, U. et al. Meinung/Dialog. Wirtsch. Inform. 49, 403–409 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-007-0087-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-007-0087-5

Navigation