Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag untersucht den aktuellen Forschungsstand der eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) und bedient sich dabei der Methodik der Literaturanalyse. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass überwiegend ein empirisch-quantitatives Forschungsdesign Anwendung findet. Die Beiträge unterscheiden sich inhaltlich in Forschung über XBRL und mit XBRL. Die Forschung mit XBRL verfolgt die Entwicklung konzeptioneller Erweiterungen der XBRL. Die Arbeiten über XBRL betrachten beispielsweise die Veränderungen im Berichtswesen durch XBRL als auch die Akzeptanz und Durchsetzung des Finanzberichterstattungsstandards. Die Ergebnisse zeigen offene Themen auf und sind relevant für Forschung und Praxis.
Abstract
The paper examines the current state of research as regards the eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) by using the literature review methodology. The results show that an empirical-quantitative research design is used most of the time. The contributions vary in substance in terms of research on XBRL and research with XBRL. Research with XBRL focuses on the development of conceptual XBRL extensions. Work on XBRL considers, for example, the changes in reporting as a result of XBRL as well as the acceptance and enforcement of financial reporting standards. The results point to open issues and are relevant for research and practice.
Notes
Eine vollständige Liste der Zeitschriften ist in Tab. A-3 zu finden.
Jedoch ist zu erwähnen, dass die zeitliche Einschränkung nicht intendiert ist, sondern sich aus der Historie der XBRL natürlich beschränkt.
Vollständige Übersichten zu Forschungsmethoden und Forschungsdesign befinden sich in Tab. A-1 und Tab. A-2.
Common Reporting enthält eine auf XBRL basierende Taxonomie mit den Regeln von Basel II zur Berichterstattung zwischen Banken und den jeweiligen Aufsichtsbehörden und wurde vom Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) in Auftrag gegeben.
Literatur
Alles MG, Kogan A, Vasarhelyi MA (2008) Exploiting comparative advantage: a paradigm for value added research in accounting information systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 9(4):202–215
Apostolou AK, Nanopoulos KA (2009) Interactive financial reporting using XBRL: an overview of the global markets and Europe. International Journal of Disclosure & Governance 6(3):262–272
Baldwin AA, Brown CE, Trinkle BS (2006) XBRL: an impacts framework and research challenge. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 3:97–116
Berkeley A, Donahue DF, Moyer PD, Bolgiano MC (2009) XBRL reaches tipping point. Journal of Securities Operations & Custody 2(2):128–133
Bonsón E, Cortijo V, Escobar T (2008) The role of XBRL in enhanced business reporting (EBR). Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 5:161–173
Bonsón E, Cortijo V, Escobar T (2009a) Towards the global adoption of XBRL using international financial reporting standards (IFRS). International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 10(1):46–60
Bonsón E, Cortijo V, Escobar T, Flores F (2009b) Implementing XBRL successfully by mandate and voluntarily. Online 33(1):37–40
Bonsón E, Cortijo V, Escobar T, Flores F, Monreal S (2010) Solvency II and XBRL: new rules and technologies in insurance supervision. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 18(2):144–157
Boritz JE, No WG (2004) Assurance on XML based information services: XARL. Canadian Accounting Perspective 3(2):207–233
Boritz JE, No WG (2005) Security in XML-based financial reporting services on the Internet. Journal of Accounting & Public Policy 24(1):11–35
Boritz JE, No WG (2008) The SEC’s XBRL voluntary filing program on EDGAR: a case for quality assurance. Current Issues in Auditing 2(2):36–50
Boritz JE, No WG (2009) Assurance on XBRL-related documents: the case of united technologies corporation. J Inf Syst 23(2):49–78
Bovee M, Ettredge ML, Srivastava RP, Vasarhelyi MA (2002) Does the year 2000 XBRL taxonomy accommodate current business financial-reporting practice? J Inf Syst 16(2):165–182
Bovee M, Kogan A, Nelson K, Srivastava RP, Vasarhelyi MA (2005) Financial reporting and auditing agent with net knowledge (FRAANK) and extensible business reporting language (XBRL). J Inf Syst 19(1):19–41
Branson M (2002) Using XBRL for data reporting. Statistical Journal of the UN Economic Commission for Europe 19(3):201
Burnett RD, Friedman M, Murthy U (2006) Financial reports: why you need XBRL. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 17(5):33–40
Cho CH, Roberts RW (2010) Environmental reporting on the Internet by America’s Toxic 100: legitimacy and self-presentation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 11(1):1–16
Choi JP (1997) Herd behavior, the “penguin effect” and the suppression of informational diffusion: an analysis of informational externalities and payoff interdependency. RAND Journal of Economics 28(3):407–425
Cohen E (2004) Compromise or customize: XBRL’s paradoxical power. CAP Forum on E-Business 3(2):187–206
Cohen E (2009) XBRL’s Global ledger framework: exploring the standardised missing link to ERP integration. International Journal of Disclosure & Governance 6(3):188–206
Debreceny R, Gray GL (2001) The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2(1):47–74
Debreceny R, Chandra A, Cheh JJ, Guithues-Amrhein D, Hannon NJ, Hutchison PD, Janvrin D, Jones RA, Lamberton B, Lymer A, Mascha M, Nehmer R, Roohani S, Srivastava RP, Trabelsi S, Tribunella T, Trites G, Vasarhelyi MA (2005) Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC’s EDGAR aystem: a critique and evaluation. J Inf Syst 19(2):191–210
Debreceny R, Felden C, Ochocki B, Piechocki M, Piechocki M (2009) XBRL for interactive data: engineering the information value chain. Springer, Berlin
Debreceny R, Farewell S, Piechocki M, Felden C, Gräning A (2010) Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC. J Account Public Policy 29(3):296–306
Deshmukh A (2004) Xbrl. Communications of AIS 2004(13):196–219
Doolin B, Troshani I (2004) XBRL. a research note. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 1(2):93–104
Fahy M, Feller J, Finnegan P, Murphy C (2009) Co-operatively re-engineering a financial services information supply chain: a case study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences) 26(2):125–135
Farewell SM (2006) An Introduction to XBRL through the use of research and technical assignments. J Inf Syst 20(1):161–185
Fengyi L, Sheng ORL, Wu S (2005) An integrated framework for eChain bank accounting systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems 105(3):291–306
Fettke P (2006) State-of-the-Art des State-of-the-Art: Eine Untersuchung der Forschungsmethode “Review” innerhalb der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Wirtschaftsinformatik 48(4):257–266
Gräning A, Kienegger H (2007) Standardisierung der europaweiten Berichterstattung im Rahmen der Messung der Gesamtenergieeffizienz von Gebäuden. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 49(5):370–379
Granovetter M (1978) Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83:1420–1443
Gray GL, Miller DW (2009) XBRL: solving real-world problems. International Journal of Disclosure & Governance 6(3):207–223
Hodge FD, Kennedy JJ, Maines LA (2004) Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting? Accounting Review 79(3):687–703
Hoffman C (2006) Financial reporting using XBRL, IFRS and US GAAP Edition. Lulu.com
Johnson S (2008) CFOs anticipate a filing crunch. http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/11877821?f=related. Abruf am: 2009-01-10
Kernan K (2009) The story of our new language: personalities, cultures, and politics combine to create a common, global language for business. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: S 1–30
Kesselmeier B, Frank R (2009) Kapitalmarktkommunikation. Schlüsseltechnologie XBRL IT & Kommunikation 2:72
Kranich P, Schmitz H (2003) Die extensible business reporting language. Wirtschaftsinformatik 1:77–80
Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S (1997) The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review 38(3):93–102
Lester WF (2007) Xbrl: the new language of corporate financial reporting. Business Communication Quarterly 70(2):226–231
Locke J, Lowe A (2007) XBRL: an (open) source of enlightenment or disillusion? European Accounting Review 16(3):585–623
McCann D (2010) 18,000 Tagging errors in XBRL filings so far. http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14529555?f=most_read
Mejzlik L, Istvanfyova J (2008) XBRL – the tool for automated semantic readability of electronic financial statements. International Journal of Technology Transfer & Commercialisation 7(1):7–7
Mena Á, López F, Framiñan JM, Flores F, Gallego JM (2010) XPDRL project: improving the project documentation quality in the spanish architectural engineering and construction sector. Autom Constr 19(2):270–282
Nutz A, StraußM (2002) eXtensible business reporting language (XBRL) Konzept und praktischer Einsatz. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 44(5):447–457
Palvia P, Leary D, Mao E, Midha V, Pinjani P, Salam AF (2004) Research methodologies in MIS: an update. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 14:526–542
Piechocki M, Gräning A (2008) Standardisation level of the eXtensible business reporting language. Business Information Technology 9(1):5–16
Piechocki M, Felden C, Gräning A, Debreceny R (2009) Design and standardisation of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency. International Journal of Disclosure & Governance 6(3):224–240
Pinsker R (2003) XBRL awareness in auditing: a sleeping giant? Managerial Auditing Journal 18(9):732–736
Pinsker R (2004) Teaching XBRL to graduate business students: a hands-on approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research 5(1):5–17
Pinsker R, Li S (2008) Costs and benefits of Xbrl adoption: early evidence. Commun ACM 51(3):47–50
Pinsker R, Wheeler P (2009) Nonprofessional investors’ perceptions of the efficiency and effectiveness of XBRL-enabled financial statement analysis and of firms providing XBRL-formatted information. International Journal of Disclosure & Governance 6(3):241–261
Plumlee RD, Plumlee MA (2008) Assurance on XBRL for financial reporting. Accounting Horizons 22(3):353–368
Premuroso RF, Bhattacharya S (2008) Do early and voluntary filers of financial information in XBRL format signal superior corporate governance and operating performance?. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 9(1):1–20
Ramin KP, Kesselmeyer B (2007) XBRL als internetbasierter Standard für die Finanzberichterstattung. KoR Zeitschrift für internationale und kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung 7(10):560–571
Ray S, Das S (2009) Corporate reporting framework (CRF): benchmarking tata motors against AB Volvo and exploring future challenges decision (0304-0941). Das Decision 36(1):101–129
Schuster P, O’Connell V (2006) The trend toward voluntary corporate disclosures. Management Accounting Quarterly 7(2):1–9
SEC (2009) Final rule: interactive data to improve financial reporting. http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2009/33-9002.pdf. Abruf am 2009-07-20
Spies M (2010) An ontology modelling perspective on business reporting. Inf Syst 35(4):404–416
Taylor EZ, Dzuranin AC (2010) Interactive financial reporting: an introduction to eXtensible business reporting language (XBRL). Issues in Accounting Education 25(1):71–83
Troshani I, Doolin B (2007) Innovation diffusion: a stakeholder and social network view. European Journal of Innovation Management 10(2):176–200
Troshani I, Lymer A (2010) Translation in XBRL standardization. Information Technology & People 23(2):136–164
Vasile F, Petronel AC, Georgel TC (2009) The normalization of financial data exchange over the Internet: adopting international standard Xbrl. Annals of the university of Oradea. Economic Science Series 18(4):935–939
Vessey I, Ramesh V, Glass RL (2002) Research in information systems: an empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(2):129–174
Wagenhofer A (2003) Economic consequences of Internet financial reporting. Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR) 55(4):262–279
Watson LA (2009) Sorry wrong number – study finds financial results of 209 listed Indian companies don’t add up. International Journal of Disclosure & Governance 6(3):185–187
Webster J, Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past preparing the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26(2):xiii–xxiii
Williams SP, Scifleet PA, Hardy CA (2006) Online business reporting: an information management perspective. Int J Inf Manage 26(2):91–101
Woodroof J, Searcy D (2001) Continuous audit: model development and implementation within a debt covenant compliance domain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2(3):169–191
Yoon H, Zo H, Ciganek AP (2011) Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry? Journal of Business Research 64(2):157–163
XBRL (2008) E-Bilanz nach SteuBAG mit XBRL. http://www.xbrl.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=84&Itemid=7. Abruf am 2010-7-20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Angenommen nach vier Überarbeitungen durch Prof. Dr. Peter Buxmann.
Die Aussagen entsprechen der Meinung des Autors M. Piechocki und nicht der IFRS Foundation.
This article is also available in English via http://www.springerlink.com and http://www.bise-journal.org: Gräning A, Felden C, Piechocki M (2011) Status Quo and Potential of XBRL for Business and Information Systems Engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi: 10.1007/s12599-011-0169-1.
Zusätzliche Information
Ergänzendes Onlinematerial kann unter folgendem Link abgerufen werden.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gräning, A., Felden, C. & Piechocki, M. Status Quo und Potenziale der eXtensible Business Reporting Language für die Wirtschaftsinformatik. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK 53, 225–234 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-011-0282-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-011-0282-2