Skip to main content
Log in

Entwicklung von Mobile-Platform-Ecosystem-Strukturen und -Strategien

On the Evolution of Mobile Platform Ecosystem Structure and Strategy

  • State of the Art
  • Published:
WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK

Zusammenfassung

Plattform-Strukturen haben sich zu einem Kernelement technologie-orientierter Wirtschaftszweige entwickelt. Sie ermöglichen nicht nur neue Produkte und Dienstleistungen, sondern beeinflussen Strategien, die Ausgestaltung von Geschäftsmodellen und tragen zum Wandel ganzer Industrien bei. Insbesondere im Mobile-Business-Ecosystem spielen Plattformen eine herausragende Rolle. Der Erfolg der Smartphones hat zu einer starken Konkurrenzsituation zwischen den mobilen Plattformen geführt. Gerätehersteller, Netzwerkbetreiber und Anwendungsentwickler stehen im Fokus der Bemühungen der Plattformenbetreiber. Basierend auf der theoretischen Basis der Marktanalysen, strategischer Netzwerke und Business-Ecosystems wird in diesem Beitrag ein Visualisierungsansatz gewählt, um die Entwicklung einer globalen, unternehmensübergreifenden Marktstruktur zu untersuchen und genutzte Strategien der Plattformbetreiber über die vergangenen fünf Jahre zu verdeutlichen. Bedeutsame Unterschiede zwischen verschiedenen Plattform-Strategien werden aufgezeigt. Die sich daraus ergebenden Implikationen für das Mobile-Business-Ecosystem werden insbesondere mit Blick auf die „App Economy“ diskutiert.

Abstract

Platforms have become a core fundament of many technology industries. Platforms not only enable new products and services but have also been shown to influence strategies, shape business models, and even transform entire industries. Platforms play a particularly important role in the mobile ecosystem. The success of smartphones has led to an intense battle of mobile platforms, each looking for ways to become the system of choice for mobile device manufacturers, mobile network operators, and mobile application developers. Drawing on theories of platform markets, strategic networks, and business ecosystems, this paper uses a visualization approach to study the evolving global interfirm structure and examines strategies used in the mobile platform ecosystem over the past five years. We identify important differences between mobile platform strategies and discuss their implications for both mobile ecosystem participants and the future of the app economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  • Abello J, Koutsofios E, Gansner E, North S (1999) Large networks present visualization challenges. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 33:13–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3):425–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson C (2006) The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. Hyperion, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. The Rand Journal of Economics 37:668–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes SJ (2002) The mobile commerce value chain: analysis and future developments. International Journal of Information Management 22(2):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basole RC (2008) Enterprise mobility: applications, technologies, and strategies. IOS, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Basole RC (2009) Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology 24(2):144–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basole RC, Rouse WB (2008) Complexity of service value networks: conceptualization and empirical investigation. IBM Systems Journal 47(1):53–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basole RC, Hu M, Patel P, Stasko J (2010) Visualizing converging business ecosystems for competitive intelligence. In: Conference on Information Visualization, IEEE, Salt Lake City, S 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj V, Mrvar A (1998) Pajek – program for large network analysis. Connections 21(2):47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker RA, Eick SG, Wilks AR (1995) Visualizing network data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1:16–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau E, Penard T (2007) The economics of digital business models: a framework for analyzing the economics of platforms. Review of Network Economics 6(2):81–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Calem RE (2010) Battle of the handset operating systems. Vision May/June: 18–21

  • Chesbrough HW, Appleyard MM (2007) Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review 50(1):57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou A, Camilleri E, Kapetanakis M (2010) Mobile developer economics 2010 and beyond. VisionMobile, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Vergne HJ, Milanesi C, Cozza R, Gupta A, Lu CK, Nguyen TH, Zimmermann A (2010) Competitive landscape: mobile devices, worldwide, 2Q10. Gartner, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Battista G, Eades P, Tamassia R, Tollis IG (1999) Graph drawing: algorithms for the visualization of graphs. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Distimo (2010a) App stores – overview. http://www.distimo.com/appstores. Abruf am 2010-08-10

  • Distimo (2010b) Report – June 2010. http://www.distimo.com/uploads/reports/Distimo%20Report%20-%20June%202010.pdf. Abruf am 2010-08-27

  • Distimo (2011) App store characteristics 2008–2011. Custom report (2011-05-24)

  • Dittrich K, Duysters G (2007) Networking as a means to strategy change: the case of open innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24(6):510–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4):660–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Economides N, Katsamakas E (2006) Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science 52:1057–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards C (2009) iMgonnagetrich. Engineering & Technology 4(16):70–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eick SG (1996) Aspects of network visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 16(2):69–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7(2):136–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann TR (2008) Managing proprietary and shared platforms. California Management Review 50(4):31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS, Hagiu A, Schmalensee R (2006) Invisible engines: how software platforms drive innovation and transform industries. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM (1991) Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software, Practice & Experience 21(11):1129–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz J, Wasserman S (1989) Mimetic and normative processes within an interorganizational field: an empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly 34(3):454–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A, Cusumano M (2002) Platform leadership: how Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16(1):1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19(4):293–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R, Gargiulo M (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology 104(5):1439–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21:203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R (2001) Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review 26:431–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman I, Melancon G, Marshall MS (2000) Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 6(1):24–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti M, Levien R (2004a) The keystone advantage: what new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti M, Levien R (2004b) Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3):68–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer B, Lee CH, Venkatraman N (2006) Managing in a ‘small world ecosystem’: lessons from the software sector. California Management Review 48(3):28–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer B, Chi-Hyon L, Venkatraman N, Vesset D (2007) Monitoring platform emergence: guidelines from software networks. CAIS 19:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries S (2009) The App economy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jul/29/iphone-apps. Abruf am 2010-07-16

  • Kamada T, Kawai S (1989) An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters 31:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller R, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2006) Matrices or node-link diagrams: which visual representation is better for visualising connectivity models? Information Visualization 5(1):62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koka BR, Prescott JE (2008) Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 29(6):639–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CH, Venkatraman N, Tanriverdi H, Iyer B (2010) Complementarity-based hypercompetition in the software industry: theory and empirical test, 1990–2002. Strategic Management Journal 31:1431–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Whalley J (2002) Deconstruction of the telecommunications industry: from value chains to value networks. Telecommunications Policy 26:451–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan D, Burrows P, Ante SE (2009) Inside the app economy. Business Week 4153:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland CF, Bauer JM, Westerveld R (2002) The European market for mobile data: evolving value chains and industry structures. Telecommunications Policy 26(9–10):485–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanesi C, Cozza R, Zimmermann A, De La Vergne HJ, Nguyen TH, Gupta A, Lu CK (2009) Competitive landscape: mobile devices, worldwide, 3Q09. Gartner, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody J, McFarland D, Bender-deMoll S (2005) Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology 110(4):1206–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71(3):75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JF (1996) The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Stanley Research (2009) The mobile Internet report. Morgan Stanley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen (2010) U.S. smartphone battle heats up: which is the “most desired” operating system? http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/us-smartphone-battle-heats-up/. Abruf am 2011-05-19

  • Nohria N, Garcia-Pont C (1991) Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal 12(1):105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1990) Determinants of interorganizational relationships: integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15:241–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker G, Alstyne MV (2008) Managing platform ecosystems. In: Twenty ninth international conference on information systems. AIS, Paris, S 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton J, Kapetanakis M, Camilleri E, Constantinou A (2011) Developer economics 2011. VisonMobile, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppard J, Rylander A (2006) From value chain to value network. European Management Journal 24(2):128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: a review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management 33(3):479–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuver MD, Bouwman H, Haaker T (2009) Mobile business models: organizational and financial design issues that matter. Electronic Markets 19(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4):990–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf L, Padula G (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organization Science 19(5):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf L, Schilling M (2007) Comparing alliance network structure across industries: observations and explanations. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 53(7):1113–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzhoff S (2010) Q2 mobile developer survey. Appcelerator, Mountain View

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (1991) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman B, Aris A (2006) Network visualization by semantic substrates. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12(5):733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez F, Edelman B, Srinivasan A (2009) Symbian, Google & Apple in the mobile space. Harvard Business School Case 909-055, Boston

  • Tilson D, Lyytinen K (2006) The 3G transition: changes in the US wireless industry. Telecommunications Policy 30(10–11):569–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte E (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N, Lee CH (2004) Preferential linkage and network evolution: a conceptual model and empirical test in the U.S. video game sector. Academy of Management Journal 47(6):876–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ware C, Purchase H, Colpoy L, McGill M (2002) Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Information Visualization 1(2):103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West J (2003) How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy 32(7):1259–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Die Autoren bedanken sich bei den Herausgebern und den vier anonymen Gutachtern für ihre hilfreichen Kommentare und Anregungen. Die Autoren möchten auch Vincent Hoogsteder und Gert Jan Spriensma von Distimo B.V. für ihre Erkenntnisse über die App-Store-Entwicklung und die Bereitstellung detaillierter Daten danken.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul C. Basole.

Additional information

Angenommen nach drei Überarbeitungen durch Dr. Bub.

This article is also available in English via http://www.springerlink.com and http://www.bise-journal.org: Basole RC, Karla J (2011) On the Evolution of Mobile Platform Ecosystem Structure and Strategy. Bus Inf Syst Eng. doi: 10.1007/s12599-011-0174-4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basole, R.C., Karla, J. Entwicklung von Mobile-Platform-Ecosystem-Strukturen und -Strategien. Wirtschaftsinf 53, 301–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-011-0286-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11576-011-0286-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation