Skip to main content
Log in

Semidefinite optimization models for limit and shakedown analysis problems involving matrix spreads

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limit and shakedown analysis problems of Computational Mechanics lead to convex optimization problems, characterized by linear objective functions, linear equality constraints and constraints expressing the restrictions imposed by the material strength. It is shown that two important strength criteria, the Mohr–Coulomb and the Tresca criterion, can be represented as systems of semidefinite constraints, leading this way to semidefinite programming problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Save M.A., Massonet C.E., De Saxce G. (1997). Plastic limit analysis of plates, shells and disks. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Maier G. (1969). Shakedown theory in perfect elastoplasticity with associated and nonassociated flow laws: a finite element, linear programming approach. Meccanica 4:250–260

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn M.Z., Maier G. (eds) (1977). Engineering Plasticity by Mathematical Programming. Pergamon Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bottero A., Negre R., Pastor J., Turgeman S. (1980). Finite element method and limit analysis theory for soil mechanics problems.Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 22:131–149

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Christiansen E. (1996). Limit analysis of collapse states. In: Ciarlet P.G., Lions J.L. (eds) Handbook of Numerical Analysis, vol 4. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 193–312

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heitzer, M., Staat, M. (eds.): Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis. NIC-Series vol. 15. J.v. Neumann Institute for Computing, Juelich. Available at http://www.fz-juelich.de/lisa

  7. Chen W.F., Mizuno E. (1990). Nonlinear Analysis in Soil Mechanics. Theory and Implementation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bisbos C.D., Makrodimopoulos A., Pardalos P.M. (2005). Second-order cone programming approaches to static shakedown analysis in steel plasticity. Optim. Methods Softw. 20:25–52

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Vandenberghe L., Boyd S. (1996). Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev. 38:49–95

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramana M., Pardalos P.M. (1996). Semidefinite programming. In: Terlacky T. (eds) Interior Point Methods of Mathematical Programming. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 369–398

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolkowicz H., Saigal R., Vandenberghe L. (eds) (2000). Handbook of Semidefinite Programming. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. (2001). Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization. Analysis, Algorithms and Engineering Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mittelmann H.D. (2003). An independent benchmarking of SDP and SOCP solvers. Math. Program. 95:407–430

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mirsky L. (1956). The spread of a matrix. Mathematika 3:127–130

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Brauer A., Mewborn A.C. (1959). The greatest distance between two characteristic roots of a matrix. Duke Math. J. 26:653–661

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein E., Zhang G., König J.A. (1992). Shakedown with nonlinear strain-hardening including structural computation using finite element method. Int. J. Plast. 8:1–31

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. D. Bisbos.

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. Pardalos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisbos, C.D. Semidefinite optimization models for limit and shakedown analysis problems involving matrix spreads. Optimization Letters 1, 101–109 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-006-0006-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-006-0006-5

Keywords

Navigation