Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal kernel selection in twin support vector machines

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In twin support vector machines (TWSVMs), we determine pair of non-parallel planes by solving two related SVM-type problems, each of which is smaller than the one in a conventional SVM. However, similar to other classification methods, the performance of the TWSVM classifier depends on the choice of the kernel. In this paper we treat the kernel selection problem for TWSVM as an optimization problem over the convex set of finitely many basic kernels, and formulate the same as an iterative alternating optimization problem. The efficacy of the proposed classification algorithm is demonstrated with some UCI machine learning benchmark datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach, F., Lanckriet, G., Jordan, M.: Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). ACM, New York (2004)

  2. Bennett, K., Momma, M., Embrechts, J.: MARK: A boosting algorithm for heterogeneous kernel models. In: Proceedings of the Eighth SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, New York (2002)

  3. Bezdek J.C., Hathaway R.J.: Convergence of alternating optimization. Neural Parallel Sci. Comput. 11(4), 351–368 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository for Machine Learning databases. University of California, Department of Information and Computer Sciences, Irvine, CA, 1998. On-line at http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

  5. Burges C.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 2(2), 121–167 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cortes C., Vapnik V.N.: Support vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Duda R.O., Hart P.R., Stork D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fung, G., Dundar, M., Bi, J., Rao, B.: A fast iterative algorithm for Fisher discriminant using heterogeneous kernels. In: Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). ACM, New York (2004)

  9. Fung, G., Mangasarian, O.L.: Proximal Support Vector Machines. In: Proceedings of KDD-2001, San Francisco, pp. 77–86 (2001)

  10. Guarracino M.R., Cifarelli C., Seref O., Pardalos P.M.: A classification method based on generalized eigenvalue problems. Optim. Methods Softw. 22(1), 73–81 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamers, B., Suykens, J., Leemans, V., Moor, B.D.: Ensemble learning of coupled parameterized kernel models. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 130–133 (2003)

  12. Jayadeva, Khemchandani R., Chandra S.: Twin Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 29(5), 905–911 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanckriet G.R.G., Cristianini N., Bartlett P., Ghaoui L.El., Jordan M.I.: Learning the kernel matrix with semidefinite programming. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 27–72 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mangasarian O.L.: Nonlinear Programming. SIAM, Philadelphia (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mangasarian O.L., Wild E.W.: Multisurface Proximal Support Vector Classification via Generalized Eigenvalues. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28(1), 69–74 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mika S., Rätsch G., Müller K.: A mathematical programming approach to the kernel Fisher algorithm. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 13, 591–597 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Saunders, C., Gammerman, A., Vovk, V.: Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables” In: ICML ’98, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, Madison, WI, pp. 515–521 (1998). http://citeseer.csail.mit.edu/saunders98ridge.html

  18. http://www.mathworks.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suresh Chandra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khemchandani, R., Jayadeva & Chandra, S. Optimal kernel selection in twin support vector machines. Optim Lett 3, 77–88 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-008-0092-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-008-0092-7

Keywords

Navigation