Skip to main content
Log in

A new complexity result on multiobjective linear integer programming using short rational generating functions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new complexity result for solving multiobjective integer programming problems. We prove that encoding the entire set of nondominated solutions of the problem in a short sum of rational functions is polynomially doable, when the dimension of the decision space is fixed. This result extends a previous result presented in De Loera et al. (INFORMS J. Comput. 21(1):39–48, 2009) in that there the number of the objective functions is assumed to be fixed whereas ours allows this number to vary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barvinok A.: A polynomial time algorithm for counting integral points in polyhedra when the dimension is fixed. Math. Oper. Res. 19, 769–779 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barvinok A., Woods K.: Short rational generating functions for lattice point problems. J. Am. Math. Soc. 16, 957–979 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanco V., Puerto J.: Partial Gröbner bases for multiobjective combinatorial optimization. SIAM J. Discret. Math. 23(2), 571–595 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanco, V., Puerto, J.: Some algebraic methods for solving multiobjective polynomial integer programs. J. Symb. Comput. (2010). doi:10.1016/j.jsc.2010.10.003

  5. Brion M.: Points entiers dans les polyèdres convexes. Annales scientifiques de l’Ècole Normale Supèrieure Sér. 4 21(4), 653–663 (1988)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chinchuluun A., Pardalos P.M.: A survey of recent developments in multiobjective optimization. Ann. Oper. Res. 154(1), 29–50 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chinchuluun, A., Pardalos, P., Migdalas, A., Pitsoulis, L. (eds): Pareto optimality, game theory and equilibria. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. De Loera J.A., Haws D., Hemmecke R., Huggins P., Sturmfels B., Yoshida R.: Short rational functions for toric algebra and applications. J. Symb. Comput. 38(2), 959–973 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. De Loera J.A., Haws D., Hemmecke R., Huggins P., Yoshida R.: A computational study of integer programming algorithms based on Barvinok’s rational functions. Discret. Optim. 2(2), 135–144 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. De Loera J.A., Hemmecke R., Köppe M.: Pareto optima of multicriteria integer linear programs. INFORMS J. Comput. 21(1), 39–48 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X. (eds): Multiple Criteria optimization. state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys. Kluwer, Boston (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández E., Puerto J.: The multiobjective solution of the uncapacitated plant location problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 45(3), 509–529 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fonseca M.C., García-Sánchez A., Ortega-Mier M., Saldanha-da-Gama F.: A stochastic bi-objective location model for strategic reverse logistics. TOP 18(1), 158–184 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lasserre J.B.: Generating functions and duality for integer programs. Discret. Optim. 2(1), 167–187 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Setämaa-Kärkkäinen A., Miettinen K., Vuori J.: Heuristic for a new multiobjective scheduling problem. Optim. Lett. 1(3), 213–225 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodríguez, R., Luque, M., González, M.: Portfolio selection in the Spanish stock market by interactive multiobjective programming. TOP (2010). Available online doi:10.1007/s11750-010-0139-7

  17. Scholz D.: The multicriteria big cube small cube method. TOP 18(1), 286–302 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Sherbeny, N.: Resolution of a Vehicle Routing Problem with Multiobjective Simulated Annealing Method, PhD thesis, Faculte Polytechnique de Mons, Belgium (2001)

  19. Steuer R.E.: Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application. Wiley, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ulungu E., Teghem J.: The two-phases method: an efficient procedure to solve biobjective combinatorial optimization problems. Found. Comput. Decis. Sci. 20(2), 149–165 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Woods K., Yoshida R.: Short rational generating functions and their applications to integer programming. SIAG/OPT Views News 16, 15–19 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zionts S.: A survey of multiple criteria integer programming methods. Ann. Discret. Math. 5, 389–398 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zopounidis, C., Pardalos, P. (eds.): Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis Series: Applied Optimization, vol. 103, p. 455 (2010). ISBN 978-3-540-92827-0 (print), 978-3-540-92828-7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor Blanco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanco, V., Puerto, J. A new complexity result on multiobjective linear integer programming using short rational generating functions. Optim Lett 6, 537–543 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0279-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0279-1

Keywords

Navigation