Skip to main content
Log in

On the volumetric path

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the logarithmic and the volumetric barrier functions used in interior point methods. In the case of the logarithmic barrier function, the analytic center of a level set is the point at which the central path intersects that level set. We prove that this also holds for the volumetric path. For the central path, it is also true that the analytic center of the optimal level set is the limit point of the central path. The only known case where this last property for the logarithmic barrier function fails occurs in case of semidefinite optimization in the absence of strict complementarity. For the volumetric path, we show with an example that this property does not hold even for a linear optimization problem in canonical form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anstreicher K.M.: On Vaidya’s volumetric cutting plane method for convex programming. Math. Oper. Res. 22, 63–89 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Anstreicher K.M.: Towards a practical volumetric cutting plane method for convex programming. SIAM J. Optim. 9, 190–206 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Anstreicher K.M.: The volumetric barrier for semidefinite programming. Math. Oper. Res. 25(3), 365–380 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson D.S., Vaidya P.M.: A cutting plane algorithm for convex programming that uses analytic centers. Math. Program. 69, 1–43 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Deza A., Nematollahi E., Terlaky T.: How good are interior point methods? Klee–Minty cubes tighten iteration-complexity bounds. Math. Program. 113(1), 1–14 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Elhedhli, S., Goffin, J.L., Vial, J.P.: Nondifferentiable optimization: cutting plane methods. In: Encyclopedia of Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)

  7. Halicka M., De Klerk E., Roos C.: On the convergence of the central path in semidefinite optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12(4), 1090–1099 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. De Klerk E.: Aspects of Semidefinite Programming: Interior Point Algorithms and Selected Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehrotra, S., Zhifeng, L.: Branching on hyperplane methods for mixed integer linear and convex programming using adjoint lattices. J. Glob. Optim. 1–27. doi:10.1007/s10898-010-9554-4 (2010)

  10. Terlaky T., Roos C., Vial J.-P.: Interior Point Methods for Linear Optimization. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vaidya, P.M.: A new algorithm for minimizing convex functions over convex sets. In: SFCS ’89: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp 338–343. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1989)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamás Terlaky.

Additional information

Research supported by a start-up grant of Lehigh University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mut, M., Terlaky, T. On the volumetric path. Optim Lett 6, 687–693 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0293-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0293-3

Keywords

Navigation