Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trust region subproblem with an additional linear inequality constraint

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies an extended trust region subproblem (eTRS) in which the trust region intersects the unit ball with a single linear inequality constraint. We present an efficient algorithm to solve the problem using a diagonalization scheme that requires solving a simple convex minimization problem. Attainment of the global optimality conditions is discussed. Our preliminary numerical experiments on several randomly generated test problems show that, the new approach is much faster in finding the global optimal solution than the known semidefinite relaxation approach, especially when solving large scale problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck, A., Eldar, Y.C.: Strong duality in nonconvex quadratic optimization with two quadratic constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 17, 844–860 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Tal, A., Ghaoui, L.E., Nemirovski, A.: Robust optimization. In: Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics (2009)

  3. Bertsimas, D., Brown, D., Caramanis, C.: Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Rev. 53, 464–501 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertsimas, D., Pachamanova, D., Sim, M.: Robust linear optimization under general norms. Oper. Res. Lett. 32, 510–516 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Burer, S., Anstreicher, K.M.: Second-order cone constraints for extended trust region problems. SIAM J. Optim. 23(1), 432–451 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Burer, S., Yang, B.: The trust region subproblem with non-intersecting linear constraints. In: Working Paper (2013)

  7. Conn, A.R., Gould, N.I.M., Toint, P.L.: Trust region methods. MPS—SIAM Series on Optimization, Philadelphia (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukushima, M., Yamamoto, Y.: A second-order algorithm for continuous-time nonlinear optimal control problems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control AC-31(7), 673–676 (1986)

  9. Jeyakumar, V., Li, G.Y.: Trust region problems with linear inequality constraints: exact SDP relaxation, global optimality and robust optimization. Math. Program. Ser. A 147, 171–206 (2014)

  10. Liao, A.: Solving unconstrained discrete-time optimal-control-problems using trust method. In: Technical Report CTC95TR230, Advanced Computing Research Institute, Cornell Theory Center, Ithaca (1995)

  11. Moré, J.J.: Generalizations of the trust region subproblem. Optim. Methods Softw. 2, 189–209 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pardalos, P., Romeijn, H.: Handbook of Global Optimization, vol. 2. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

  13. Powell, M.J.D., Yuan, Y.: A trust region algorithm for equality constrained optimization. Math. Program. 49, 189–211 (1990/91)

  14. Salahi, M.: A semidefinite relaxation scheme for quadratically constrained quadratic problems with an additional linear constraint. Iran. J. Oper. Res. 2, 29–34 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stern, R.J., Wolkowicz, H.: Indefinite trust region subproblems and nonsymmetric eigenvalue perturbations. SIAM J. Optim. 5, 286–313 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the reviewer for the helpful comments on the early version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Salahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salahi, M., Fallahi, S. Trust region subproblem with an additional linear inequality constraint. Optim Lett 10, 821–832 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0957-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-015-0957-5

Keywords

Navigation