Abstract
Many relevant multidimensional phenomena are defined by nested latent concepts, which can be represented by a tree-structure supposing a hierarchical relationship among manifest variables. The root of the tree is a general concept which includes more specific ones. The aim of the paper is to reconstruct an observed data correlation matrix of manifest variables through an ultrametric correlation matrix which is able to pinpoint the hierarchical nature of the phenomenon under study. With this scope, we introduce a novel model which detects consistent latent concepts and their relationships starting from the observed correlation matrix.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A matrix \(\mathbf {A} = [a_{ij}]\) is nonnegative if \(a_{ij} \ge 0 \; \forall i,j\) (see Horn and Johnson 2013, p. 519). It is important to stress that the definition of a nonnegative matrix is different from that of a nonnegative definite matrix.
Negative values are not taken into account herein thanks to the assumption of nonnegative correlations which is introduced from this section on.
References
Bechtoldt H (1961) An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypothesis. Psychometrika 26(4):405–432
Blalock HM (1964) Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Norton, New York
Brouwer AE, Haemers WH (2012) Spectra of graphs. Springer, New York
Brown W (1910) Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British J Psychol 3:296–322
Carroll JB (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cattell RB (1978) The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. Plenum, New York
Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334
Dellacherie C, Martinez S, San Martin J (2014) Inverse M-matrices and ultrametric matrices, lecture notes in mathematics. Springer International Publishing
Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. In: Rosenzweig MR, Porter LW (eds) Annual review of psychology, vol 41. Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 417–440
Gignac GE (2016) The higher-order model imposes a proportionality constraint: that is why the bifactor model tends to fit better. Intelligence 55:57–68
Holzinger KJ, Swineford F (1937) The bi-factor method. Psychometrika 2(1):41–54
Horn RA, Johnson CR (2013) Matrix analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York
Hubert L, Arabie P (1985) Comparing partitions. J Classif 2(1):193–218
Jennrich RI, Bentler PM (2011) Exploratory bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika 76(4):537–549
Jennrich RI, Bentler PM (2012) Exploratory bi-factor analysis: the oblique case. Psychometrika 77(3):442–454
Kano Y (1997) Exploratory factor analysis with a common factor with two indicators. Behaviormetrika 24(2):129–145
Mulaik SA, Quartetti DA (1997) First order or higher order general factor? Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 4(3):193–211
Osburn HG (2000) Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychol Methods 5(3):343–355
Rindskopf D, Rose T (1988) Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res 23(1):51–67
Schmid J, Leiman JM (1957) The development of hierarchical factorial solutions. Psychometrika 22(1):53–61
Spearman CE (1910) Correlation calculated from faulty data. British J Psychol 3:271–295
Spearman CE (1927) The abilities of man: their nature and measurement. Macmillan, New York
Thompson GH (1948) The factorial analysis of human ability. Houghton Mifflin, New York
Thurstone LL (1947) Multiple factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Undheim JO, Gustafsson JE (1988) The hierarchical organization of cognitive abilities: restoring general intelligence through the use of Linear Structural Relations (LISREL). Multivar Behav Res 22(2):149–171
Warrens MJ (2015) Some relationships between Cronbach’s alpha and the Spearman–Brown formula. J Classif 32(1):127–137
Wherry RJ (1959) Hierarchical factorial solutions without rotation. Psychometrika 24(1):45–51
Yung YF, Thissen D, McLeod LD (1999) On the relationship between the higher-order factor model and the hierarchical factor model. Psychometrika 64(2):113–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavicchia, C., Vichi, M. & Zaccaria, G. The ultrametric correlation matrix for modelling hierarchical latent concepts. Adv Data Anal Classif 14, 837–853 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-020-00400-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-020-00400-z
Keywords
- Ultrametric correlation matrix
- Hierarchical latent concepts
- Partition of variables
- Hierarchical factor models
- Higher-order models