Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of mutual funds using multi-dimensional information

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To make better use of mutual fund information for decision-making we propose a coned-context, data envelopment analysis (DEA) model with expected shortfall (ES) modeled under an asymmetric Laplace distribution in order to measure risk when evaluating performance of mutual funds. Unlike traditional models, this model not only measures the attractiveness of mutual funds relative to the performance of other funds, but also takes the decision makers’ preferences and expert knowledge/judgment into full consideration. The model avoids unsatisfying and impractical outcomes that sometimes occur with traditional measures and it also provides more management information for decision-making. Determining input and output variables is obviously very important in DEA evaluation. Using statistical tests and theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that ES under an asymmetric Laplace distribution is reliable and we therefore propose the model as a major risk measure for mutual funds. At the same time, we consider a fund’s performance over different time horizons (e.g., one, three and five years) in order to determine the persistence of fund performance. Using the coned-context DEA model with ES value under an asymmetric Laplace distribution, we also present the results of an empirical study of mutual funds in China, which provides significant insights into management of mutual funds. This analysis suggests that the coned context measure will help investors to select the best fund and fund managers in order to identify the funds with the most potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1): 77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharpe W. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under condition of risk. Journal of Finance, 1964, 19(3): 425–442

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharpe W. Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 1966, 39(S1): 119–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Treynor J L. How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 1966, 43(1): 63–75

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen M. The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance, 1968, 23(2): 389–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen, M.R. Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolios. Journal of Finance, 1969, 42(2): 167–247

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roll R. Ambiguity, when performance is measured by the security market line. Journal of Finance, 1978, 33(4): 1051–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Murthi B, Choi Y, Desai P. Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: a non-parametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 98(2): 408–418

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi Y, Murthi B. Relative performance evaluation of mutual funds: a nonparametric approach. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2001, 28(7–8): 853–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McMullen P, Strong R. Selection of mutual fund using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 1998, 4: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sedzro K, Sardano D. Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Working Paper, School of Business, University of Quebec at Montreal, Canada, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morey M, Morey R. Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multihorizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking. International Journal of Management Science, 1999, 27: 241–258

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Galagedera D, Silvapulle P. Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Managerial Finance, 2002, 28(9): 60–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilkens K, Zhu J. Portfolio evaluation and benchmark selection: a mathematical programming approach. Journal of Alternative Investments, 2001, 4(1): 9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Basso A, Funari S. A data envelopment analysis approach to measure the mutual fund performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 135(3): 477–492

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Basso A, Funari S. Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: a DEA approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2003, 54(5): 521–531

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang K P. Evaluating mutual fund performance: an application of minimum convex input requirement set approach. Computers & Operations Research, 2004, 31(6): 929–940

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao X J, Zhang H S, Lai K K, Wang S Y. A Method for evaluating mutual funds’ performance based on asymmetric Laplace distribution and DEA approach. Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, 2007, 27(10): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao X J, Ma C Q. Excavate mutual funds’ management information based on DEA model. Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice, 2008, 28(8): 190–196

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao X, Wang S. Empirical study on Chinese mutual funds’ performance. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(3): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao X J, Wang S Y. Studies on Mutual Funds Evaluation System in China, Beijing: Science Press, 2007 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seiford L M, Zhu J. Context-dependent data envelopment analysismeasuring attractive and progress. International Journal of Management Science, 2003, 31: 397–408

    Google Scholar 

  23. Halme M, Joro T, Korhonen P, Salo S, Wallenius J. A value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1999, 45(1): 103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor S. Modelling Financial Time Series, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2007

  25. Simonson I, Tversky A. Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 1992, 29(3): 281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Wei Q L, Huang Z M. Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. International Journal of Systems Science, 1989, 20(7): 1099–1118

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Huang Z M. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, 46(1–2): 73–91

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson R G, Langemeier L N, Lee C, Lee E, Thrall R. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with applications to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 1990, 46(1–2): 93–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson R G, Dharmapala P S, Thrall R M. Linked-cone DEA profit ratios and technical efficiency with application to illinois coal mines. International Journal of Production Economics, 1995, 39(1–2): 99–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thompson R G, Dharmapala P S, Louis J. DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of 14 major oil companies in U.S. Exploration and Production. Computers & Operations Research, 1996, 23(4): 357–373

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D. Thinking coherently. Risk (Concord, NH), 1997, 10(11): 68–71

    Google Scholar 

  32. Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J, Heath D. Coherent measures of risk. mathematical finance, 1999, 9(3): 203–228

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Embrechts P, McNeil A, Straumann D. Correlation and Dependency in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls. In: Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, 2002, 176–223

  34. Zhu H Q, Lu Z D, Wang S Y. The core estimation theory of valueat-risk. Systems Sciences and Mathematics, 2002, 22(3): 365–374

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang H. Modeling and Forecasting of Value-at-Risk in Management: New Method Based on asymmetric Laplace distribution. Master Thesis, Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003

  36. Shi M, Wang S Y, Xu S Y. Amendatory sharp index and its application in funds’ performance evaluation. Systems Engineering Theory and Application, 2006, 7: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  37. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429–444

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiujuan Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, X., Shi, J. Evaluation of mutual funds using multi-dimensional information. Front. Comput. Sci. China 4, 237–253 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-010-0503-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-010-0503-7

Keywords

Navigation