Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of weak spots in the metrological investigation of dynamic machine behaviour

  • Machine Tool
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both the measurement of frequency response functions and the modal analysis are established tools for the measurement of the dynamic compliance of machine tools. State of the art measurement technique enables an allocation of dynamic weak points of the machine structure and optimization of the machine design on the basis of these measurement results. In recent applications the metrological investigation is used for the parameterization and the verification of simulation models to describe the dynamic behaviour of machine tools, which demands high standards regarding to the quantitative quality of measurement results. This paper describes the interlaboratory comparison test, which has been carried out at well-known German research institutes and was initiated by the Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL) of the RWTH Aachen. In this regard, the question is discussed, to what extent the compliance behaviour of machine structures under real process conditions corresponds to behaviour, determined in metrological investigation under idealized test conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahlborn D (1992) Meß- und Parameterfehler bei der Modalanalyse von Maschinen, Dissertation, Universität Hannover

  2. Bard Y (1974) Nonlinear parameter estimation. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendat JS, Peirsol AG (1986) Random data—analysis and measurement procedures. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Corelli D, Zimmermann R (1983) Calibration of measurement channels for structural testing. Sound Vib 17(3):S28–S32

    Google Scholar 

  5. Enochson E (1987) Digital signal analysis and aliasing. Sound Vib 21(1):S28–S31

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esser M (2010) Stabilitätssimulation für das HPC-Fräsen. Dissertation, WZL RWTH Aachen, Apprimus Verlag Aachen

  7. Ewins DJ (1987) Uses and abuses of modal analysis. Sound Vib 21(6):S32–S39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirschknopf P (1989) Ermittlung modaler Parameter aus Übertragungsfrequenzgängen. IWB Forschungsbericht Band 20. Springer, Berlin

  9. Mc Connel KG, Abdelhamid MK (1987) On the dynamic calibration of measurement systems for modal analysis. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 2(3):S121–S127

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mouch TA, Aker S, Hicks J (1986) A study of digital signal processing errors causing by improper ADC settings. In: Proceedings of the 4th international modal analysis conference, pp S1433–S1437

  11. Natke HG (1988) Einführung in die Theorie und Praxis der Zeitreihen und Modalanalyse. Vieweg, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neugebauer R, Kolouch M, Richter M (2009) Fehlerquellen bei einer Modalanalyse. wt Werkstattstechnik online 99(H. 11/12):S889–S894

  13. Papoulis A (1966) Error analysis in sampling theory. Proc IEEE 54(7):S946–S955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell CD (1983) Structural frequency response—can it be measured? Sound Vib 17(2):5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prößler EK (1981) Experimenmtell—rechnerische Analyse von Maschineschwingungen. Fortschrittbericht VDI—Z, Reihe 11, Nr. 36, Düsseldorf VDI—Verlag

  16. Rao CR (1973) Lineare statistische Methoden und ihre Anwendungen. Akademie Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanbo H, Mc Connel KG (1989) The effects of transducer cross—axis sensitivity in modal analysis. In: Proceedings of the 7th international modal analysis conference, pp S505–S511

  18. Schmidt H (1985) Resolution bias errors in spectral density, frequency response and coherence function measurements, IV: time delay bias errors. J Sound Vib 101(3):S404–S412

    Google Scholar 

  19. Serbyn MR (1983) Interferometric phase calibration of vibration pickups. In: Proceedings of the 1st international modal analysis conference, pp S223–S229

  20. Tietz W Experimentell—rechnerische Untersuchung von Maschinenschwingungen. Dissertation, TH Karl Marx Stadt (heute Chemnitz)

  21. Tönshoff HK, Ahlborn D (1992) Statistische Sicherheit bei der Modalanalyse von Werkzeugmaschinen, Forschung im Ingenieurwesen—Engineering Research Bd. 58, Nr. 1/2

  22. Tretheway MW (1986) Truncation and time delay bias spectral estiamtion errors in structural testing. In: Proceedings of the 4th international modal analysis conference, pp S123–S129

  23. Vanherck P (1988) On the calibration of accelerometers. In: Proceedings of the 13th international modal analysis conference

  24. Wasan MT (1970) Parametric estimation. Mc Graw Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Weck M (2001) Werkzeugmaschinen Bd. 5, Messtechnische Untersuchung und Beurteilung; 6. neu. bearb. Aufl. Springer, Berlin

  26. Weck M, Teipel K (1977) Dynamisches Verhalten Spanender Werkzeugmaschinen. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for its financial support for the priority programme 1180 “Prediction and influence of the interaction of structures and processes” as well as for their support in carrying out the work of the interlaboratory comparison test. Particular thanks are due to all institutes and colleagues, who, together with their metrology and experimental results, were indispensable for the success of the interlaboratory comparison test: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Prof. E. h. Dr. h. c. mult. U. Heisel (IfW Stuttgart), Dr. Sc. M. Storchak, Prof. Dr. h. c. Dr.-Ing. E. Uhlmann (IWF Berlin), Dipl.-Ing. Patrick Rasper, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dr.-Ing. habil. H. Ulbrich (AM TU München), Dipl.-Ing. Rainer Britz, Prof. Dr.-Ing. G. Reinhart (IWB TU München), Dipl.-Ing. Florian Schwarz, Prof. Dr.-Ing. D. Biermann (ISF Dortmund), Dipl.-Ing. A.V. Scheidler.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Werkzeugmaschinenlabor, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    C. Brecher & R. Hermes

  2. IFW, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    B. Denkena & D. Heinisch

  3. IWM, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

    K. Grossmann & M. Löser

  4. LTM, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

    P. Steinmann & A. Bouabid

Authors
  1. C. Brecher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Denkena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Grossmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Steinmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Bouabid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Heinisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Hermes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. Löser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Hermes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brecher, C., Denkena, B., Grossmann, K. et al. Identification of weak spots in the metrological investigation of dynamic machine behaviour. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 5, 679–689 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0339-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0339-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation