Skip to main content
Log in

Prognosis of the local tool wear in gear finish hobbing

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gear finish hobbing is a method for soft finishing of external cylindrical power transmission gears. The application of this process is required when the process chain of gear production is to be set up completely free of coolant. Since this finishing technology is relatively new, there is some practical experience, but no fundamental knowledge regarding economical process design. One challenge in process design is that unbalanced tool wear typically leads to geometrical deviations of the machined gear profile. The aim of the investigations described in this paper is to develop a wear model which is capable to predict the local tool wear of gear finish hobbing tools. This model is based on analogy cutting trials and geometrical analyses of the chip geometries in gear finish hobbing. The results of the model are validated by fly-cutting trials with different local loads on the tool. The validation shows that an optimization of the local tool wear development can be achieved by means of the prediction model. Therefore, an optimization of the technological process parameters can be carried out based on this model to reach an efficient process design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brecher C, Weck M, Klocke F, Rütjes U (2005) Analysis of a bevel gear cutting process by manufacturing simulation. Prod Eng 12(2):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weck M, Klocke F, Winter W, Winkel O (2003) Analysis of gear hobbing processes by manufacturing simulation. Prod Eng 10(1):55–58

    Google Scholar 

  3. Komori M, Sumi M, Kubo A (2003) Simulation of hobbing for analysis of cutting edge failure due to chip Crush. ASME report PTG-48068

  4. Abood AM, Bicker R, Pennell T (2002) An analysis of cutting forces in gear hobbing. VDI Berichte 1665:129–143

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bouzakis K-D, Kombogiannis S, Antoniadis A, Vidakis N (2002) Gear hobbing cutting process simulation and tool wear prediction models. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biermann D, Kahnis P (2010) Analysis and simulation of size effects in micromilling. Prod Eng 4:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinksmeier E, Riemer O (2000) Wirkmechanismen bei der Mikrozerspanung. Materialwiss Werkstofftech 31(8):754–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Shi J, Gong Y, Abba G, Cai G (2008) A micro milling model considering metal phases and minimum chip thickness. Key Eng Mater 375–376:505–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu X, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (2006) An analytic model for the prediction of minimum chip thickness in micromachining. J Manuf Sci Eng 128:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klocke F, Weber G (2003) Einfluss unterschiedlicher Gefügezustände auf den Werkzeugverschleiß bei der Feinbearbeitung von einsatzgehärtetem Stahl. AiF 12633N/1

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf Schalaster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klocke, F., Gorgels, C., Weber, GT. et al. Prognosis of the local tool wear in gear finish hobbing. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 5, 651–657 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0343-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-011-0343-9

Keywords

Navigation