Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

R&R (repeatability and reproducibility) gage study applied on gaps’ measurements of aircraft assemblies made by a laser technology device

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the competitive advantages when a type of laser instrument is applied in the aircraft production environment. This contribution reports the winnings that could be achieved when measurements made by a laser technology are done. This proposed application comprises a modern and suitable resource that contributes to a higher performance and relevant gains in competitiveness for the companies. It can provide a high level of accuracy, flexibility, productivity, quality and speed on the manufacturing floor. A case study, based on a statistics gage named repeatability and reproducibility method, is done to demonstrate the gained advantages and benefits when the laser device is used. This study aims to evaluate and compare the variability of measurements between a manual instrument of measurement and a laser instrument during aircraft production processes and its relevant quality issues for the business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery DC (2008) Introduction to statistical quality control, 6th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Da Fonseca MP (2008) Measurement system analysis (MSA) as a tool for Process Control in an industry of disposable medical devices. Graduation work. University Federal of Juiz de Fora. Production Engineering

  3. Silva EA, Campos R (2001) The importance of metrology in management of business and competitiveness in the country. State University of Norte Fluminense

  4. Pedott AH (2010) Analysis of functional data applied to the study of R&R (repeatability and reproducibility): ANOVA of the distances. Dissertation of Master Degree. University Federal of Rio Grande do Sul. Production Engineering

  5. Juran JM, Gryna FM (1991) Handbook of quality control—concepts, policies and philosophy of quality. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. AIAG Manual (2010) Analysis of measurement systems. Automotive Industry Action Group

  7. Gerges SNY (2005) Noise and vehicle vibrations, 1st edn. NR, Florianopolis

    Google Scholar 

  8. VIM (2008) ISO Guide/IEC 99:2007—international vocabulary of metrology: basic concepts, general concepts and associated terms, 3rd edn. IPQ, Caparica, Portugal

  9. Canossa S (2004) MSA—analysis of the measurement system, 3rd edn. SERCAN Treinamento e Consultoria. São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil

  10. Montgomery DC (2007) Economic models and process quality control. Qual Reliab Eng Int 2(4):221–228

  11. Aimi V (2010) Proposal and validation of a new methodology for automated measurement of working gaps in automotive steering systems. Dissertation of Master Degree. University Federal of Rio Grande do Sul. Mechanical Engineering

  12. Montgomery DC (2004) Introduction to statistical quality control, 4th edn. LTC, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schissatti ML (1998) A deployment methodology of Shewarth letters for process control. Dissertation of Master Degree. Production Engineering. UFSC, Florianópolis

  14. Fechio V (2009) Measurement systems analysis MSA—non replicable measurement system. Brasmetal Waelzholz S. A. Industry and Sales. Diadema, Brazil

  15. Silva AC (2005) A systematic for metrological quality assurance applied to industrial environment. Dissertation of Master Degree. Production Engineering. UFSC, Florianópolis

  16. Helms MM (1996) Perspectives on quality and productivity for competitive advantage. TQM Mag 8(3):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montgomery DC (2003) Quality improvement and economic growth. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19(3):183–254

  18. McKinsey & Company (2013) Manufacturing the future: the next era of global growth and innovation. McKinsey Global Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deloitte (2013) Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index. Deloitte, USA

  20. Kane J (2013) Metrology bridges the gap. Aerosp Manuf Mag. July, pp 24–25

  21. Barrentine LB (2003) Concepts for R&R studies, 2nd edn. ASQ Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI, USA, p 76

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, 13566-590, Brazil

    G. F. Barbosa

  2. University of Araraquara, Araraquara, 14801-340, Brazil

    G. F. Peres & J. L. G. Hermosilla

Authors
  1. G. F. Barbosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. F. Peres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. L. G. Hermosilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. F. Barbosa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbosa, G.F., Peres, G.F. & Hermosilla, J.L.G. R&R (repeatability and reproducibility) gage study applied on gaps’ measurements of aircraft assemblies made by a laser technology device. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 8, 477–489 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0553-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0553-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation