Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrated FTA-DFMEA approach for reliability analysis and product configuration considering warranty cost

  • Quality Assurance
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Product configuration is an important approach in customization environments. In this study, an integrated approach is developed to improve product configuration considering product reliability, warranty and purchasing cost of components as evaluation criteria. In order to meet customer requirements, the market’s feedbacks are considered and used in the fault tree analysis (FTA) to identify product failures and defective components. In addition, reliability and total cost of each generated configuration are computed. Series and parallel systems and redundancy are considered to calculate reliability. Then, an integrated FTA and design failure modes and effects analysis approach is proposed. Risk priority number is used to evaluate each configuration option from risk viewpoint. Finally, a case study of laptop computer is used to show the applicability of the proposed integrated approach. The numerical results show that the proposed approach provides several configuration options for manufacturers by considering various decision criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ambekar SB, Edlabadkar A, Shrouty V (2013) A review: implementation of failure mode and effect analysis. Int J Eng Innov Technol 2(8):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azadeh A, Maleki Shoja B, Ghanei S, Sheikhalishahi M (2015) A multi-objective optimization problem for multi-state series-parallel systems: a two-stage flow-shop manufacturing system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 136:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Azadeh A, Seif J, Sheikhalishahi M, Yazdani M (2015) An integrated support vector regression–imperialist competitive algorithm for reliability estimation of a shearing machine. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2014.1002810

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Billinton R, Allan RN (1992) Reliability evaluation of engineering systems, 2nd edn. Plenum, New York and London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chattopadhyay G, Murthy DNP (2000) Warranty cost analysis for second-hand products. Math Comput Model 31:81–88

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chattopadhyay G, Rahman A (2008) Development of lifetime warranty policies and models for estimating costs. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginn DM, Jones DV, Rahnejat H, Zairi M (1998) The “QFD/FMEA interface”. Eur J Innov Manag 1(1):7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gojanovic A (1996) An introduction to failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). A thesis submitted to the University of Colorado at Denver in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of master of basic science

  9. Hussain AZMO, Murthy DNP (2003) Wrranty and optimal reliability improvement through product development. Math Comput Model 38:1211–1217

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hvam L, Bonev M, Denkena B, Schurmeyer J, Dengler B (2011) Optimizing the order processing of customized products using product configuration. Prod Eng Res Dev 5(6):595–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jalali Naini SG, Shafiee M (2011) Joint determination of price and upgrade level for a warranted second-hand product. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:1187–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang R, Murthy DNP (2009) Impact of quality variations on product reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleyner A, Sandborn P (2008) Minimizing life cycle cost by managing product reliability via validation plan and warranty return cost. Int J Prod Econ 112:796–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li B, Chen L, Huang Z, Zhong Y (2006) Product configuration optimization using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(1–2):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y, Liu Z (2010) Multi-objective product configuration involving new components under uncertainty. J Eng Des 21:473–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Y, Liu Z (2010) An integration method for reliability analyses and product configuration. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Liu Z, Wang Y (2013) Customized warranty offering for configurable products. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 118:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu Y, Fernandez MG, Nagappan G, den Ouden E, Mistree F, Brombacher AC (2004) Reliability-focused parts selection in derivative product-development-processes, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference. Singapore 13:1105–1109

  19. Murthy DNP, Rausand M, Virtanen S (2009) Investment in new product reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1593–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Murthy DNP, Hagmark PE, Virtanen S (2009) Product variety and reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1601–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Murthy DNP, Østerås T, Rausand M (2009) Component reliability specification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:1609–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nassar SM, Souder WE (1989) An interactive knowledge-based system for forecasting new product reliability. Comput Ind Eng 17(1):323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ong SK, Lin Q, Nee AYC (2006) Web-based configuration design system for product customization. Int J Prod Res 44:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patricio RP, Catai RE, Michaud CR, Nagalli A (2013) Model of risk management based in the FMEA technique–a case study in the construction of Gabions. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:4183–4199

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peng W, Huang HZ, Li Y, Zuo MJ, Xie M (2013) Life cycle reliability assessment of new products—a Bayesian model updating approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 112:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pitiot P, Aldanondol M, Vareilles E, Coudert T Gaborit P (2013) Improving configuration and planning optimization: towards a two task approach. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Configuration Workshop, Austria, 43–50

  27. Rahman A, Chattopadhyay G (2010) Modelling Total Cost of Ownership of Rail Infrastructure for Outsourcing Maintenance Services. Definition Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset, EAMR, vol 1. Springer, London, pp 115–122

  28. Sabin D, Weigel R (1998) Product configuration frameworks—a survey. IEEE Intell Syst 13(4):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheikhalishahi M, Ebrahimipour V, Farahani MH (2013) An integrated GA-DEA algorithm for determining the most effective maintenance policy for a k-out-of-n problem. J Intell Manuf 25(6):1455–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheikhalishahi M (2014) An integrated simulation-data envelopment analysis approach for maintenance activities planning. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 27(9):858–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang X, Wang M, Wang S (2007) A systematic methodology for quality control in the product development process. Int J Prod Res 45:1561–1576

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Teoh PC, Case K (2005) An evaluation of failure modes and effects analysis generation method for conceptual design. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 18:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang HS, Che ZH, Wang MJ (2009) A three-phase integrated model for product configuration change problems. Expert Syst Appl 36:5491–5509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang CH (2013) Incorporating customer satisfaction into the decision-making process of product configuration: a fuzzy Kano perspective. Int J Prod Res 51:6651–6662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang CH, Hsueh OZ (2013) A novel approach to incorporate customer preference and perception into product configuration: a case study on smart pads. Comput Stand Interfaces 35:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ward H, Christer AH (2005) Modelling the re-design decision for a warranted product. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 88:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xie H, Henderson P, Kernahan M (2005) Modelling and solving engineering product configuration problems by constraint satisfaction. Int J Prod Res 43:4455–4469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang D, Dong M (2012) A constraint satisfaction approach to resolving product configuration conflicts. Adv Eng Inform 26:592–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang LL (2014) Product configuration: a review of the state-of-the-art and future research. Int J Prod Res 52:6381–6398

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestions by the respected reviewers, which have enhanced the strength and significance of this work. This study was supported by a grant from University of Tehran (Grant No. 8106013/1/18). The authors are grateful for the support provided by the College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Industrial Engineering and Center of Excellence for Intelligent-Based Experimental Mechanic, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

    A. Azadeh, M. Sheikhalishahi & A. Aghsami

Authors
  1. A. Azadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Sheikhalishahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Aghsami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Azadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azadeh, A., Sheikhalishahi, M. & Aghsami, A. An integrated FTA-DFMEA approach for reliability analysis and product configuration considering warranty cost. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 9, 635–646 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0642-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0642-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation