Skip to main content
Log in

Supplier selection considering strategic and operational risks: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a combined qualitative and quantitative approach for supplier selection problem. Multi-component product is considered in which various suppliers could provide each required part. A multi-objective mathematical model is developed to decide about the preferred supplier as well as the purchasing quantity of each part from each selected supplier. Strategic and operational risks are taken into account. In order to handle qualitative risk factors analytic network process is used. Two quantitative risk factors including delay and defect are considered. In addition, the quality of the final product is taken into account. To enable the decision maker to make preferred trade-offs between objectives a fuzzy goal programming approach with soft priorities between objectives is applied. The capability and effectiveness of the proposed model is validated through a case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu C, Barnes D (2011) A literature review of decision-making models and approaches for partner selection in agile supply chains. J Purch Supply Manag 17:256–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sawik T (2011) Selection of supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega 39:194–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawik T (2013) Selection of resilient supply portfolio under disruption risks. Omega 41:259–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson GW (1966) An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. J Purch 2(1):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aksoy A, Ozturk N (2011) Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just- in-time production environments. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):6351–6359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuo RJ, Lee LY, Hu TL (2010) Developing a supplier selection system through integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEA: a case study on an auto lighting system company in Taiwan. Prod Plan Control 21(5):468–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chai J, Liu JNK, Ngai EWT (2013) Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst Appl 40(10):3872–3885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. William H, Xiaowei X, Prasanta KD (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Vidalis M, Vrisagotis V, Varlas G (2014) Performance evaluation of a two-echelon supply chain with stochastic demand, lost sales, and Coxian-2 phase replenishment times. Int Trans Oper Res 21(4):649–671

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Berman O, Kim E (2004) Dynamic inventory strategies for profit maximization in a service facility with stochastic service, demand and lead time. Math Methods Oper Res 60(3):497–521

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawik T (2011) Selection of a dynamic supply portfolio in make-to-order environment with risks. Comput Oper Res 38(4):782–796

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Moinzadeh K, Zhou Y (2008) Incorporating delay mechanism in ordering policies in multi-echelon distribution systems. IIE Trans 40(4):445–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202:16–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Choudhary D, Shankar R (2014) A goal programming model for joint decision making of inventory lot-size, supplier selection and carrier selection. Comput Ind Eng 71:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amin SH, Zhang G (2012) An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: multi-objective approach. Expert Syst Appl 39(8):6782–6791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chai J, Ngai EW (2014) Multi-perspective strategic supplier selection in uncertain environments. Int J Prod Econ 166:215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kull TJ, Talluri S (2008) A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 55(3):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rezaei J, Davoodi M (2008) A deterministic, multi-item inventory model with supplier selection and imperfect quality. Appl Math Model 32(10):2106–2116

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. De Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P (2001) A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 7:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh. ISBN 0-9620317-8-X

    Google Scholar 

  21. Akoz O, Petrovic D (2007) A fuzzy goal programming method with imprecise goal hierarchy. Eur J Oper Res 181:1427–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Azadeh A, Sheikhalishahi JM, Asadzadeh SM, Saberi M, Pirayesh Neghab AE (2013) Forecasting and optimization of service level in vague and complex SCM by a flexible neural network-fuzzy mathematical programming approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5):1453–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod Oper Manag 14(1):53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oke A, Gopalakrishnan M (2009) Managing disruptions in supply chains: a case study of a retail supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 118:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chopra S, Sodhi MS (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 46(1):53–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson MC (2007) The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transp Res Part E 43:295–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheikhalishahi M, Torabi SA (2014) Maintenance supplier selection considering life cycle costs and risks: a fuzzy goal programming approach. Int J Prod Res 52(23):7084–7099

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the valuable comments and suggestion from the respected reviewers. Their valuable comments and suggestions have enhanced the strength and significance of our paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Sheikhalishahi.

Appendix

Appendix

Equipment part

Supplier 1

Supplier 2

Supplier 3

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

Suppliers’ delay (day)

 1

3

6

2

11

9

8

11

7

9

 2

5

4

8

8

10

13

12

14

11

 3

6

5

3

9

8

11

16

11

10

Expected number of repairs [E(NR ijk )] (per year)

 1

0.55

0.52

0.49

0.52

0.50

0.48

0.49

0.46

0.43

 2

0.51

0.48

0.46

0.49

0.46

0.45

0.46

0.43

0.40

 3

0.48

0.46

0.43

0.46

0.44

0.43

0.43

0.40

0.38

Mean time to repair (MTTR) (h)

 1

5.00

4.75

4.50

4.80

4.56

4.42

4.51

4.20

3.90

 2

4.65

4.42

4.19

4.46

4.24

4.11

4.20

3.90

3.63

 3

4.40

4.18

3.96

4.22

4.01

3.89

3.97

3.69

3.43

Defect rate (parts per 1000)

 1

14

21

11

11

18

9

8

17

4

 2

13

26

20

12

10

13

13

18

13

 3

17

23

10

8

14

11

9

4

5

Expected values of the repair cost (C ijk ) (Dollar)

 1

79

65

53

80

66

57

79

63

50

 2

78

64

52

79

64

56

77

61

48

 3

78

63

51

78

64

55

76

60

47

Purchasing price (\( C_{ijk}^{0} \)) (Dollar)

 1

115.9

104.3

93.9

127.5

114.7

103.2

139.0

125.1

112.6

 2

127.5

114.7

103.2

140.2

126.2

113.6

153.0

137.7

123.9

 3

140.2

126.2

113.6

154.2

138.8

124.9

168.2

151.4

136.3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nekooie, M.A., Sheikhalishahi, M. & Hosnavi, R. Supplier selection considering strategic and operational risks: a combined qualitative and quantitative approach. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 9, 665–673 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0643-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-015-0643-6

Keywords

Navigation