Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Powder recycling in laser beam melting: strategies, consumption modeling and influence on resource efficiency

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laser beam melting (LBM) is a powder-bed and laser-based additive manufacturing technology that is increasingly used for the production of metal components. For a sustainability assessment of a production technology, the global warming potential (GWP) can be used, which is commonly referred to as CO2-footprint. Looking at the resource demand of LBM, material losses and powder recycling play a significant role. In the LBM build-up process, powder material is selectively solidified, generating the part layer-by-layer. The non-solidified powder material can be recycled, which is beneficial to the resource efficiency of the process. Due to considerations regarding powder quality degradation, the number of reuse powder cycles in industrial practice varies significantly, ranging from only one to more than several dozen cycles. Similarly, material losses during the process have shown to differ between LBM machines. However, previous approaches for LBM resource efficiency assessment lack a detailed representation of these two factors. In this study, two interacting models are introduced for the evaluation of the GWP of LBM parts. Firstly, a powder reuse cycle calculation model is described. Secondly, a LBM resource and energy consumption model based on the CO2PE!-methodology is put forward with a refined focus on powder recycling and material losses. The models are implemented and validated based on three LBM production use cases including the acquisition of resource and energy consumption data for three commercial LBM machines. GWP-impact values are used from the ProBas database, provided by the German Federal Environmental Agency. Based on the results regarding the three LBM use cases, the role of powder recycling and material losses on the GWP-impact of LBM during the production phase is discussed. The results show that the number of attainable powder reuse cycles lies around 35 cycles (ranging from 1 to 117 cycles) for the analyzed LBM production scenarios when applying the suggested powder recycling strategy. If powder is not recycled and only used once, more than 90% of the powder batch might be discarded. The volume-specific CO2-equivalent of 0.175 kgCO2eq/cm3 can be used as a rule of thumb for a quick estimation of the GWP for LBM parts made from Al-alloy or steel. Electric energy consumption constitutes for the largest share of GWP-impact, followed by the solidified metal powder and the occurring powder losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith-Gillespie A, Plotnek J, Peel B, Carbon Disclosure Project (2017) CDP supply chain report 2016 | 2017: missing link: harnessing the power of purchasing for a sustainable future. https://www.bsr.org/reports/Report-Supply-Chain-Climate-Change-2017.pdf

  2. Wohlers Report (2017) 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry: annual worldwide progress report. ISBN 978-0-9913332-3-3

  3. Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod 137:1573–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Renishaw (2016) White paper: investigating Ti6Al4V metal powder re-use in additive manufacturing. http://resources.renishaw.com/en/details/White%20paper%3a%20Investigating%20the%20effects%20of%20multiple%20powder%20reuse%20in%20AM(83164)

  5. Hann BA (2016) Powder reuse and its effects on laser based powder fusion additive manufactured alloy 718. SAE Int J Aerosp 9(2):209–213. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-2071

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kellens K, Dewulf W, Overcash M et al (2012) Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO2PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: methodology description. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(1):69–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0340-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumers M, Tuck C, Wildman R et al (2012) Combined build-time, energy consumption and cost estimation for direct metal laser sintering. In: Proceedings of solid freeform fabrication symposium

  8. Faludi J, Baumers M, Hague R et al (2016) Environmental impacts of selective laser melting: do printer, powder or power dominate? J Ind Ecol 21:S144–S156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kellens K, Mertens R, Paraskevas D et al (2017) Environmental impact of additive manufacturing processes: does AM contribute to a more sustainable way of part manufacturing? Proc CIRP 61:582–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walachowicz F, Bernsdorf I et al (2017) Comparative energy, resource and recycling lifecycle analysis of the industrial repair process of gas turbine burners using conventional machining and additive manufacturing. J Ind Ecol 21:S203–S215. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barclift M, Joshi S, Simpson T et al (eds) (2016) Cost modeling and depreciation for reused powder feedstock in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium—an additive manufacturing conference. Austin, TX, USA

  12. Seyda V, Herzog D, Emmelmann C et al (2014) On the treatment of Ti-6Al-4V powder in laser melting. In: Proceedings of Fraunhofer direct digital manufacturing conference

  13. Slotwinski J, Garboczi E, Stutzman P et al (2014) Characterization of metal powders used for additive manufacturing. J Res Natl Inst Stand 119:460. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Leary R, Setchi R, Prickett P et al (eds) (2015) An investigation into the recycling of Ti-6Al-4V powder used within SLM to improve sustainability. SDM'2015: 2nd international conference on sustainable design and manufacturing, Seville, Spain, 12–14 April 2015

  15. Kellens K, Yasa E, Renaldi et al (2011) Energy and resource efficiency of SLS/SLM processes. In: Proceedings of solid freeform fabrication symposium

  16. Lutter-Günther M, Hofmann A, Hauck C et al (2016) Quantifying powder losses and analyzing powder conditions in order to determine material efficiency in laser beam melting. AMM 856:231–237. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.856.231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gebbe C, Lutter-Günther M, Greiff B et al (2015) Measurement of the resource consumption of a selective laser melting process. AMM 805:205–212. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.805.205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meiners W (1999) Direktes selektives Laser-Sintern einkomponentiger metallischer Werkstoffe. Shaker, Aachen

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uhlenwinkel V, Ziesenis J, Bauckhage K (2002) Symposium spray forming. Kolloquium des SFB 372, vol 6. Univ; Books on Demand GmbH, Bremen, Norderstedt

  20. Lutter-Günther M, Horn M, Seidel C, Reinhart G (2017) Influence of particle size distribution on powder flowability and part properties in laser beam melting. In: Rapid.Tech—international trade show and conference for additive manufacturing, pp 297–311 https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446454606.022

  21. Umwelt Bundesamt (2017) ProBas Database (Umwelt Bundesamt ProBas Database 2017)

  22. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (2013) Additive manufacturing: a game changer for the manufacturing industry. http://www.rolandberger.com/media/pdf/Roland_Berger_Additive_Manufacturing_20131129.pdf

  23. Gebbe C, Hilmer S, Götz G et al (2015) Concept of the Green Factory Bavaria in Augsburg. Proc CIRP 32:53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kreitlein S, Höft A, Schwender S et al (2015) Green Factories Bavaria: a network of distributed learning factories for energy efficient production. Proc CIRP 32:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Freistaat Bayern for funding the project “Green Factory Bavaria” [23, 24] in the framework of the future initiative “Aufbruch Bayern”. Furthermore, the ProBas database provided by the German Federal Environmental Agency proved to be helpful in providing data input for the GWP calculation case studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer Research Institution for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV, Beim Glaspalast 5, 86153, Augsburg, Germany

    Max Lutter-Günther, Christian Gebbe, Tobias Kamps, Christian Seidel & Gunther Reinhart

Authors
  1. Max Lutter-Günther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Gebbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tobias Kamps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gunther Reinhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max Lutter-Günther.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 PUC model main parameter configurations resulting from full factorial variation, sorted by maximum number of cycles (Aplatform = 123 mm × 123 mm, ρpacking = 45%, ρmat = 2.68 g/cm3 (Al-Alloy AlSi10Mg), hbuild = 100 mm)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lutter-Günther, M., Gebbe, C., Kamps, T. et al. Powder recycling in laser beam melting: strategies, consumption modeling and influence on resource efficiency. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 12, 377–389 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0790-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0790-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation