Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of different grinding wheel and dressing roller specifications on grinding wheel wear

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A targeted adjustment of the dressing results and the methodological influence of the dressing process on the non-stationary wear of a grinding wheel after dressing increases the productivity and the reproducibility of grinding processes. Despite the great economic importance of grinding processes with vitrified corundum grinding wheels and the great relevance of the dressing process for the application behavior of these grinding wheels, quantitative models are missing for the purposeful design of the dressing process. In previous studies, a dressing model was successfully developed which predicts the dressing force in the dressing process as well as the workpiece roughness and the grinding wheel wear behavior in a grinding process for a specific grinding wheel and form roller specification. However, a transferability of this model to other grinding wheel and form roller specifications is not possible because the influence of the grain size and the hardness of the grinding wheel as well as the dressing tool topography on the grinding wheel wear and thus on parameters of the dressing model are not known. The objective of this work was to extend the model to additional grinding wheel and form roller specifications to ensure a broad applicability of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

∆r s :

Grinding wheel radial wear (µm)

a e :

Depth of cut (µm)

a ed :

Depth of dressing cut (µm)

A hd :

Mean dressing chip cross section (µm2)

a pd :

Dressing contact width (mm)

f ad :

Axial dressing feed per grinding wheel revolution (mm)

F nd :

Dressing normal force (N)

l kd :

Kinematic contact length (mm)

q d :

Dressing speed ratio (−)

:

Coefficient of determination (−)

U d :

Dressing overlap ratio (−)

v rd :

Velocity of the form roller (m/s)

v s :

Grinding wheel circumferential speed (m/s)

v sd :

Grinding wheel circumferential speed during dressing (m/s)

V sd,pg :

Dressed grinding wheel volume per grain (mm3)

v w :

Workpiece speed (m/min)

V′ w :

Specific material removal (mm3/mm)

References

  1. Marinescu ID, Row WB, Dimitrov B, Inasaki I (2004) Tribology of abrasive machining processes. William Andrew Inc. ISBN: 0-8155-1490-5

  2. Uhlmann E, Hochschild L (2013) Tool optimization for high speed grinding. Prod Eng Res Dev 7:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Denkena B, Köhler J, Woiwode S (2014) Dressing of vitrified bonded CBN tools for continuous generating grinding. Prod Eng Res Dev 8:585–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tönshoff HK, Friemuth T, Hessel D (2001) Crushing process for vitreous bonded CBN and diamond grinding wheels. Prod Eng Res Dev 8(1):13–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Rowe WB (1996) Analysis and simulation of the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36:871–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malkin S (1989) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. Elli Horwood Limited, Hemel Hempstead

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw MC (1996) Principles of abrasive processing. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 144–163

    Google Scholar 

  8. Linke B (2008) Dressing process model for vitrified bonded grinding wheels. Ann CIRP Manuf Technol 57:345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brinksmeier C, Çinar M (1995) Characterisation of dressing processes by determination of the collision number of the abrasive grits. Ann CIRP 44:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Klocke F, Thiermann J, Weiß M (2013) Abrichtprozess bestimmt den Schleifscheibenverschleiß - Einfluss der Belastung im Abrichtprozess auf das Verschleißverhalten der Schleifscheibe. wt Werkstattstechnik online 103(6):488–492

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wegener K, Hoffmeister H-W, Karpuschewski B, Kuster F, Hahmann W-C, Rabiey M (2011) Conditioning and monitoring of grinding wheels. Ann CIRP 60:757–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klocke F, Thiermann J, Mattfeld P (2015) Influence of the dressing process on grinding wheel wear. Prod Eng Res Dev 9:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding the research project “Quantitatives Modell des Abrichtens von keramisch gebundenen Schleifscheiben” (KL 500/99-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Prinz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prinz, S., Trauth, D., Mattfeld, P. et al. Influence of different grinding wheel and dressing roller specifications on grinding wheel wear. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 12, 441–448 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0810-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0810-7

Keywords

Navigation