Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for operational due diligence

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Operational due diligence is an essential step in the purchase decision process when mergers and acquisition (M&A) practitioners assess whether a target company can realize future performance expectations. The aim of this paper is to strengthen the current research on operational due diligence and provide practitioners with a conceptual approach to perform successful operational due diligence. Empirical data was collected through explorative case studies with five private equity firms (acquirers) and six advisory firms (representing target companies) using semi-structured interviews and documentation. 140 past M&A cases were used as the empirical data material. Findings were validated through follow-up interviews and an explorative survey. The framework was validated through three workshops with practitioners. This paper presents six groups of operational drivers which have a direct influence on the operational part of an acquisition decision: (1) People and Organization, (2) Information Technology and Systems, (3) Costs and Capital, (4) Scalability, (5), Potentials and (6) Risk. Despite increasing numbers of M&As and the low success rate of these endeavors, very little research has focused on operational due diligence. This paper addresses this gap by presenting an operational due diligence framework useful for practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahammad MF (2013) The pre-acquisition evaluation of target firms and cross border. Int Bus Rev 22:894–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez N (2007) Private Equity’s New Frontier: Operational Investing. J Priv Eq 10(2-Special Turnaround management):27–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anklesaria J (2007) Supply chain cost management: the AIM & DRIVE process for achieving extraordinary results, 1st edn. Amacom, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boston Consulting Group (2015) The art of successful acquisition: how bcg supports M&A strategy and target search. BCG Perspectives, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen CM, Alton R, Rising C, Waldeck A (2011), The big idea: the new M&A playbook. https://hbr.org/2011/03/the-big-idea-the-new-ma-playbook. Accessed 11 Dec 2017

  6. Clayton M, Christensen RACR, a. AW (2011) The big idea: the new M&A. Harv Business Rev 89:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper R, Kaplan RS (1991) Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review, Harvard, May–June 1991 issue

    Google Scholar 

  8. (2004) Getting growth right—how due diligence aids successful mergers. Strateg Dir 20(10):11–14

  9. Grebey JF (2012) Operations due diligence. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herd JSPATJ (2004) Mergers and acquisitions: Reducing M&A risk through improved due diligence. Strat Lead 32(2):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Institute of Mergers (2016) Acquisitions, Alliances M&A Statistics. [Online]. http://imaa-institute.org/mergers-and-acquisitions-statistics/. Accessed 12 Jan 2017

  12. Malik Y, Niemeyer A, Ruwadi B (2011) Building the supply chain of the future. [Online]. http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/building-the-supply-chain-of-the-future. Accessed 12 Jan 2017

  13. Morrison NJ (2008) Merger deal breakers: when operational due diligence exposes risk. J Business Strat 29(3):23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Picker L (2016) A standout year for deals, in volume and complexity. [Online]. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/04/business/dealbook/a-standout-year-for-deals-in-volume-and-complexity.html?_r=0. Accessed 12 Jan 2017

  15. PwC (2016) Private equity trend report 2016: unlocking value in turbulent times. PwC Network, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Recardo RJ (2014) The secrets of operational and organizational due diligence. Glob Bus Organ Excell 33(2):14–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell RS, Taylor BW (2017) Operations and supply chain management, 9th edn. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rothenbücher J (2008) due diligence: think operational. A. T. Kearney, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shaughnessy RM (2009) A guide to choosing genuine opportunities for turnarounds. Strat Lead 37(6):39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tompkins A (2012) Mergers & acquisitions can be risky business without supply chain due diligence. http://archive.tompkinsinc.com/mergers-acquisitions-can-be-risky-business-without-supply-chain-duediligence/. Accessed 11 Nov 2017

  21. Yin RK (2013) Case study research: design and methods, 5th edn. Sage Publishing, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zaza Nadja Lee Hansen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Porsgaard, C.B., Haubjerg, M. & Hansen, Z.N.L. A framework for operational due diligence. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 12, 633–645 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0842-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0842-z

Keywords

Navigation