Skip to main content
Log in

System profiles in content-based image indexing and retrieval

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a novel study on system profiles and adaptation of parameters for end-users of content-based indexing and retrieval (CBIR) applications are presented. The main objective of the study is improving the overall CBIR application performance in different hardware platforms having different technical capabilities and conditions. We define CBIR system profiles in terms of hardware and system platform attributes and propose CBIR parameters for each profile. Hence, the study consists of two main parts: system profiling and adaptation of indexing and retrieval parameters for each profile. The proposed CBIR parameters are appropriate configurations for optimal CBIR use on every platform. The proposed parameters for each system profile are assessed over a large set of experiments. Experimental studies show that the proposed parameters for each system profile have satisfactory semantic retrieval performance, with reduced computational complexity and storage space requirement. 45 to 78% improvement is achieved in the computational complexity of the retrieval process depending on the profile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MUVIS: A System for Content-Based Multimedia Indexing and Retrieval in Multimedia Databases. http://muvis.cs.tut.fi/

  2. Pentland, A., Picard, R.W., Sclaroff, S.: Photobook: tools for content based manipulation of image databases. In: Proceedings of SPIE Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases II (1994)

  3. Chang, S.F., Chen, W., Meng, J., Sundaram, H., Zhong, D.: VideoQ: an Automated Content Based Video Search System Using Visual Cues. In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, Seattle (1997)

  4. Datta, R., Joshi, D., Li, J., Wang, J.Z.: Image Retrieval: Ideas, Influences, and Trends of the New Age. In: ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 40(2) (2008)

  5. Zhang, Z., Guo, Z., Faloutsos, C., Xing, E.P., Pan, J.-Y.: On the Scalability and Adaptability for Multimodal Retrieval and Annotation. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing Workshops, ICIAPW 2007, pp. 39–44 (2007)

  6. Ross A.M., Rhodes D.H., Hastings D.E.: Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value. J. Syst. Eng. 11(3), 246–262 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ImagEval Webpage. http://www.imageval.org/

  8. Covey, D.T.: Usage and usability assessment: library practices and concerns. In: Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources reports. (2002), p 99

  9. Smyth, B., Lam, C.P., Chen, X., Maxville, V.: Heuristics for image retrieval using spatial configurations. In: Proceedings of Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, DICTA 2003, Sydney, pp. 909–918 (2003)

  10. Jaimes, A.: Human Factors in Automatic Image Retrieval System Design and Evaluation. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Volume: 6061, Internet Imaging VII, San Jose, USA, January 2006

  11. Eakins, J.P., Briggs, P., Burford, B.: “Image Retrieval Interfaces: A User Perspective”, Third International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, CIVR 2004, Proceedings of Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3115, Dublin, Ireland, 21–23 July 2004, pp. 628–637 (2004)

  12. Halvey, M.J., Keane, M.T.: Analysis of online video search and sharing. In: 18th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Manchester, UK, 2007, pp. 217–226

  13. Catarci, T., Kimani, S., Panizzi, E., Antona, M.: Digital Library Requirements: a Questionnaire-based Study. In: In Proceedings of the 1st Italian Research Conference on Digital Library Management Systems, IRCDL 2005, DELOS Network of Excellence, January 2005, pp. 65–74

  14. Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Rother, C., Wood, K.: Understanding photowork, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Canada, pp. 761–770 (2006)

  15. Frohlich, D., Kuchinsky, A., Pering, C., Don, A., Ariss, S.: Requirements for Photoware. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, pp. 166–175 (2002)

  16. Rodden, K., Wood, K.R.: How do People manage their Digital Photographs? In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2003), ACM Press, Fort Lauderdale, April 2003, pp. 409–416 (2003)

  17. Kuniavsky, M.: Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Research, 560 p, pp. 129–155. Morgan Kaufmann, Menlo Park (2003)

  18. Weiß, D., Scheuerer, J., Wenleder, M., Erk, A., Gülbahar, M., Linnhoff-Popien, C.: A user profile-based personalization system for digital multimedia content. In: Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference On Digital Interactive Media In Entertainment and Arts, DIMEA ’08, Athens, Greece, September, 2008, vol. 349, pp. 281–288

  19. Vallet, D., Castells, P., Fernández, M., Mylonas, Ph., Avrithis, Y.: Personalized content retrieval in context using ontological knowledge. In: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17(3), pp. 336–346 (2007)

  20. Czaja R., Blair J.: Designing surveys: a guide to decisions and procedures, 2nd edn, pp. 300. Sage, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guldogan, O., Guldogan, E., Kiranyaz, S., Caglar, K., Gabbouj, M.: Dynamic Integration of Explicit Feature Extraction Algorithms into MUVIS Framework. In: Proceedings of the FINSIG 2003, Finnish Signal Processing Symposium, Tampere, Finland, (2003)

  22. Corel Stock Photo Library, Ontario, Canada. http://www.corel.com/

  23. Swain M.J., Ballard D.H.: Color Indexing. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 7(1), 11–32 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manjunath B.S., Ohm J.-R., Vasudevan V.V., Yamada A.: Color and texture descriptors. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 11(6), 703–715 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Partio, M., Cramariuc, B., Gabbouj, M., Visa, A.: Rock Texture retrieval using gray level co-occurrence matrix. In: Proceedings of 5th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium (2002)

  26. Ma W.Y., Manjunath B.: Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 18, 837–842 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Canny J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 8(6), 679–698 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vinod, V.V. (ed.): Description of Core Experiments for MPEG-7 color/texture descriptors. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 (MPEG) document no. N2929 (1999)

  29. Manjunath B.S., Salembier P., Sikora T.: Introduction to MPEG-7. Wiley, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guldogan, E., Guldogan, O., Kiranyaz, S., Caglar, K., Gabbouj, M.: Compression effects on color and texture based multimedia indexing and retrieval. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2003, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 September 2003. 2, pp. 9–12, (2003)

  31. Maeder, A.J.: Lossy compression effects on digital image matching. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Australia, vol. 2, pp. 1626–1629 (1998)

  32. Guldogan, E., Guldogan, O., Gabbouj, M.: DCT-based downscaling effects on color and texture-based image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the EWIMT 2004, IEE European Workshop on the Integration of Knowledge, Semantics and Digital Media Technology, London, U.K., November 2004, pp. 79–86 (2004)

  33. Guldogan, E., Guldogan, O., Gabbouj, M.: Efficient image retrieval with JPEG 2000 and DWT-based downscaling. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spectral Methods and Multirate Signal Processing, SMMSP 2006, Florence, Italy, 2–3 September (2006)

  34. Xing, E.P., Jordan, M.I., Karp, R.M.: Feature selection for high-dimensional genomic microarray data. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 601–608 (2001)

  35. Liu H., Yu L.: Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17(4), 491–502 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jain A., Zongker D.: Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Trans.n Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 19(2), 153–158 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Koller, D., Sahami, M.: Toward optimal feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 284–292 (1996)

  38. Peng H., Long F., Ding C.: Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 27(8), 1226–1238 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guldogan, E., Gabbouj, M.: Mapping by adaptive threshold method for dimension reduction of content-based indexing and retrieval features. In: Proceedings of EUSIPCO 2005, European Signal Processing Conference, Antalya, Turkey, p. 4 (2005)

  40. Guldogan, O., Gabbouj, M.: Content-based image indexing and retrieval framework on symbian based mobile platform. In: Proceedings of 13. European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO, Antalya, Turkey, 4–8 September (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esin Guldogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guldogan, E., Gabbouj, M. System profiles in content-based image indexing and retrieval. SIViP 4, 463–480 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-009-0137-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-009-0137-0

Keywords

Navigation