Skip to main content
Log in

Block NLMS/F-based equalizer design and channel capacity analysis for indoor IEEE 802.11 fading wireless channels

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, adaptive decision feedback-based model is used to design an efficient equalizer to mitigate the detrimental effects during the signal transmission through wireless channels having non-ideal frequency response. The proposed adaptive equalizer is designed using normalized block least mean square/fourth algorithm which yields low bit error rate and mean square error in spite of high noisy and fading channel conditions. The constellations as well as eye diagrams are also taken as performance measuring criteria for indoor wireless channel which is designed by using IEEE 802.11 model with exponential power delay profile. The channel capacity using the proposed model is also analyzed to verify the system performance. Combination of block processing approach and the elegant structure of the equalizer achieves higher symbol estimation accuracy and stable convergence which is quite suitable for indoor fading channel characteristics. The performance comparison of the proposed model is presented with detail simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eldad, P., Anmol, S., Thomas, K., Robert, S., Daniel, H.: Investigation into the doppler component of the IEEE 802.11n channel model. Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010) (2010)

  2. Rajbhandari, S., Ghassemlooy, Z., Angelova, M.: Bit error performance of diffuse indoor optical wireless channel pulse position modulation system employing artificial neural networks for channel equalisation. IET Opto Electron 3(4), 169–179 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, W., Chen, B., Qu, H., Zhao, J.: Sparse least mean p-power algorithms for channel estimation in the presence of impulsive noise. Signal Image Video Process 10(3), 503–510 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, X., Peng, S., Wu, Z., et al.: An improved performance least mean p-power algorithm for adaptive filtering. SIViP 12, 59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-017-1130-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Djurović, I.: Estimation of sinusoidal frequency-modulated signal parameter in high-noise environment. SIViP 11, 1537 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-017-1117-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu, L., Zhao, H., Chen, C.: A new normalized subband adaptive filter under minimum error entropy criterion. Signal Image Video Process 10(6), 1097–1103 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi, L., Zhao, H.: L1L1-norm constrained normalized subband adaptive filter algorithm with variable norm-bound parameter and improved version. Signal Image Video Process 11(5), 865–871 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Korayem, R., Bendoukha, S.: A gradient descent implementation of the adaptive robust narrowband constrained LMS beamformer. SIViP 12, 463 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-017-1180-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Otaru, M.U., Zerguine, A., Cheded, L.: Channel equalization using simplified least mean-fourth algorithm. Elsevier Dig. Signal Process. 21, 447–465 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benesty, Jacob, Duhamel, Pierre: A fast exact least mean square adapti algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40(12), 2904–2920 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhuang, Weihua: Adaptive channel equalization for wireless personal communications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 48(1), 126–136 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunther, Jake, Moon, T.: Minimum bayes risk adaptive linear equalizers. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 57(12), 4788–4799 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarker Md. A.L, Lee, M.H., Chung, J.G.: ISI Free Channel Equalization for Future 5G Mobile Terminal Using Bio-inspired Neural Networks, Springer Wireless personal communication, vol. 83, No.4, pp. 2899–2923 (2015)

  14. Lakmali, A.T., Gayan, M.A., Karla, Z.-C., Hajime, S., Dhammika, J.: Linear Adaptive Channel Equalization for Multiuser MIMO-OFDM Systems. In: Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (2012)

  15. Khalida, N., Sami, A.H.: Channel Equalization of MIMO OFDM system using RLS Algorithm. In: IEEE International conference on WiCom, pp. 160–163 (2007)

  16. Attalah, M.A., Laroussi, T., Gini, F. et al.: Range-Doppler Fast block LMS algorithm for a DVB-T-based Passive balastic Rader. SIViP (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-018-1324-7

  17. Lim, S.J., Haris, J.G.: Combined LMS/F algorithm. IET. Electron. Lett. 33(6), 467–468 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wallach, E., Windrow, B.: The least mean fourth (LMF) adaptive algorithm and its family. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 30(2), 275–283 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedro, I.H., Jose, M.B.: An improved statistical analysis of the least mean fourth (LMF) adaptive algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 51(3), 664–671 (2003)

  20. Hubscher, P.I., Bermudez, J.C.M.: An improved statistical analysis of the least mean fourth (LMF) adaptive algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 51(3), 664–671 (2003)

  21. Chan, M.K., Zerguine, A., Cowan, C.F.N.: An optimized normalized LMF algorithm for sub-Gaussian noise. In: ICASSP 2003, Hong Kong, vol.6, pp. 377–80 (2003)

  22. Audeth, M.D., Kahn, J.M., Barry, J.R.: Performance of pulse position modulation on measured non-directed indoor infrared channels. IEEE Trans. Commun. 47(4), 500–503 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ming-Xian, C., Yu, T.S.: Model-Based channel estimation for OFDM signals in Rayleigh fading. IEEE Trans. Commun. 50(4), 1963–1968 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ren-Jr, C., Wen-Rong, W.: Adaptive asymptotic Bayesian equalization using a signal space partitioning technique. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 52(5), 1376–1386 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Laot, C., Glavieux, A., Labat, J.: Turbo equalization adaptive equalization and channel decoding jointly optimized. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 19(9), 1744–1752 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Lorenzo, P., Barbarossa, S., Banelli, P., Sardellitti, S.: Adaptive least mean squares estimation of graph signals. IEEE Trans. Signal Inf. Process. 2(4), 555–568 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Proakis, J.G., Digital communications. 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1995)

  28. Harish, K.S., Basabadatta, M., Bijayananda, P.: Block and fast block sparse adaptive filtering for outdoor wireless channel estimation and equalization. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 98(3), 3003–3019 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Otaru, M.U., Zerguine, A., Cheded, L.: Channel equalization using simplified least mean-forth algorithm. Dig. Signal Process. 21(3), 447–465 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the help of institutions Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla and IIIT Bhubaneswar for providing rich resources in terms of E-journals, reference books and laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harish K. Sahoo.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Exponential PDP

The exponential PDP for an indoor channel is expressed as the average power of the channel that decreases exponentially with channel delay:

$$ p(\tau ) = 1/\tau_{d} {\text{e}}^{{ - \tau /\tau_{d} }} $$
(23)

\( \tau_{d} \) is the parameter to determine the PDP and the maximum excess delay is given by:

\( \tau_{m} = - \tau_{d} \ln V \),V is the ratio of non-negligible path power to the first path power, i.e.,

$$ V = P(\tau_{m} )/P(0) = \exp ( - \tau_{d} /\tau_{m} ) $$
(24)

The discrete time model of Eq. (23) with sampling period \( T_{s} \) then can be written as:

$$ P(p) = 1/\sigma_{\tau } {\text{e}}^{{ - pT_{s} /\sigma_{\tau } }} ,\;p = 0,1, \ldots p_{\rm{max} } $$
(25)

p is the discrete index and \( p_{\rm{max} } \) is the index of the last path and \( p_{\rm{max} } = [\tau_{m} /T_{s} ] \).

The total power can be calculated as:

$$ P_{total} = \sum\nolimits_{p = 0}^{{p_{\rm{max} } }} {P(p) = } 1/\sigma_{\tau } \left( {1 - {\text{e}}^{{ - (p_{\rm{max} } + 1)T_{s} /\sigma_{\tau } }} /1 - {\text{e}}^{{ - T_{s} /\sigma_{\tau } }} } \right) $$
(26)

To normalize the total power as given in Eq. (4), Eq. (25) is again modified as:

$$ P(p) = P(0){\text{e}}^{{ - pT_{s} /\sigma_{\tau } }} ,\;p = 0,1, \ldots p_{\rm{max} } $$
(27)
$$ {\text{where}}\;P(0)\;{\text{is}}\;{\text{the}}\;{\text{first}}\;{\text{path}}\;{\text{power}}\;{\text{and}}\;P(0) = 1/\left( {p_{\text{total}} .\sigma_{\tau } } \right) $$
(28)

The probability density function (PDF) of Rayleigh’s distribution of a time varying signal statistics with flat fading channel of different multi-path component may be given as

$$ p(u) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {u/\sigma^{2} \;\exp \left( { - u^{2} /2\sigma^{2} } \right) \ldots \left( {0u \le \infty } \right)} \\ {0 \ldots (u < 0)} \\ \end{array} } \right. $$
(29)

where \( \sigma \)  rms. value of is received signal and \( \sigma^{2} \) is time-averaged signal before envelop detection.

Then, the probability of not exceeding a specified value U for the received signal is given as:

$$ p(u) = {\text{pr}}(u \le R) = \int_{0}^{U} {p(u)} {\text{d}}u = 1 - \exp \left( { - U^{2} /2\sigma^{2} } \right) $$
(30)
$$ u_{\text{mean}} = E\left[ u \right] = \int\limits_{0}^{\infty } {up(u){\text{d}}u = } \sigma \sqrt {\pi /2} = 1.2533\sigma $$
(31)

and the variance of the Rayleigh distribution is given by \( \sigma_{u}^{2} \):

$$ \begin{aligned} \sigma_{u}^{2} = & E\left[ {u^{2} } \right] - E^{2} \left[ u \right] = \int\limits_{0}^{\infty } {u^{2} } p(u){\text{d}}u - \sigma^{2} \pi /2 \\ = & \sigma^{2} \left( {2 - \pi /2} \right) = 0.4292\sigma^{2} \\ \end{aligned} $$
(32)

1.2 Doppler spectrum

The slow moving user terminal of the model associated with a bell-shaped Doppler spectrum as expressed in Eq. (33) as:

$$ S_{D} (f) = \frac{1}{{1 + 6\left( {\frac{f}{{f_{d} }}} \right)^{2} }} $$
(33)

\( S_{D} (f) \) in linear scale and \( f_{d} \), being the Doppler spectrum is expressed as \( v/\lambda \) where ‘v’ is the velocity of the environment and \( \lambda \) is the wavelength. The coherence time of the given Doppler spectrum is mathematically presented by:

$$ T_{c} = \frac{3}{{2\pi f_{d} }}{\text{In}}(2) $$
(34)

1.3 Property of a signum function

A real number defined by a function \( \text{sgn} \;x \) is defined by the following property:

$$ \text{sgn} \;x = \left\{ \begin{aligned} 1,\quad {\text{if}}\;0 < x \hfill \\ - 1,\quad {\text{if}}\;x < 0 \hfill \\ 0,\quad {\text{otherwise}} \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right. $$
(35)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohanty, B., Sahoo, H.K. & Patnaik, B. Block NLMS/F-based equalizer design and channel capacity analysis for indoor IEEE 802.11 fading wireless channels. SIViP 13, 693–701 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-018-1398-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-018-1398-2

Keywords

Navigation