Skip to main content
Log in

Force classification using surface electromyography from various object lengths and wrist postures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pattern recognition using myoelectric control of upper-limb prosthetic devices is essential to restore control of several degrees of freedom. Although much development has been relevant, the prediction of force level in finger movements is scanty. In this study, we propose the surface electromyography (sEMG) to predict the force level of the thumb-index pinch. Ten non-amputee subjects are asked to do five force levels with three different wrist positions and five object lengths. The sEMG data are recorded from three muscle regions (12 channels) of the right forearm. Twelve traditional time-domain features are extracted from collected sEMG signal. The sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) method is investigated to find the optimal set of muscles and features for force prediction. Performances from seven linear and nonlinear classifiers are compared. The results show that k-nearest neighbor and neural network outperform other classifiers with the accuracy of about 99% and 97%, respectively. The accuracy from the set of muscle groups and features selected by SFFS method is slightly better than that from the set of baseline (all of channels and features). The frequently selected muscles are from the hand region. However, the combination of lower and upper muscles also performs well, which is useful for the prosthetic design in a hand and wrist disarticulation amputee and a transradial amputee in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resnik, L., Meucci, M.R., Lieberman-Klinger, S., Fantini, C., Kelty, D.L., Disla, R., Sasson, N.: Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93, 710–717 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geethanjali, P.: Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review. Med. Devices (Auckl) 9, 247–255 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Jumaily, A., Olivares, R.A.: Bio-driven system-based virtual reality for prosthetic and rehabilitation systems. Signal Image Video Process. 6, 71–84 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kakoty, N.M., Saikia, A., Hazarika, S.M.: Exploring a family of wavelet transforms for EMG-based grasp recognition. Signal Image Video Process. 9, 553–559 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamavuako, E.N., Farina, D., Yoshida, K., Jensen, W.: Relationship between grasping force and features of single-channel intramuscular EMG signals. J. Neurosci. Methods 185, 143–150 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He, J., Zhang, D., Sheng, X., Li, S., Zhu, X.: Invariant surface EMG feature against varying contraction level for myoelectric control based on muscle coordination. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 19(3), 874–882 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kilic, E.: EMG based neural network and admittance control of an active wrist orthosis. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 31(12), 6093–6106 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Timemy, A.H., Khushaba, R.N., Bugmann, G., Escudero, J.: Improving the performance against force variation of EMG controlled multifunctional upper-limb prostheses for transradial amputees. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24(6), 650–661 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Celadon, N., Došen, S., Binder, I., Ariano, P., Farina, D.: Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 13, 73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Adewuyi, A.A., Hargrove, L.J., Kuiken, T.A.: Evaluating EMG feature and classifier selection for application to partial-hand prosthesis control. Front. Neurorobot. 19, 10–15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Theodoridis, S., Koutroumbas, K.: Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, London (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pudil, P., Novovičová, J., Kittler, J.: Floating search methods in feature selection. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 15(11), 1119–1125 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thongpanja, S., Phinyomark, A., Quaine, F., Laurillau, Y., Limsakul, C., Phukpattaranont, P.: Probability density functions of stationary surface EMG signals in noisy environments. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 65(7), 1547–1557 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oskoei, M.A., Hu, H.: Myoelectric control systems—a survey. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 2(4), 275–294 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arjunan, S.P., Kumar, D.K.: Decoding subtle forearm flexions using fractal features of surface electromyogram from single and multiple sensors. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7, 53 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jain, A.K., Duin, R.P.W., Mao, J.: Statistical pattern recognition: a review. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22, 4–37 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rokach, L., Maimon, O.: Top-down induction of decision trees classifiers—a survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 35(4), 476–487 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aydemir, O., Kayikcioglu, T.: Investigation of the most appropriate mother wavelet for characterizing imaginary EEG signals used in BCI systems. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 24, 38–49 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Altin, C., Er, O.: Designing wearable joystick and performance comparison of EMG classification methods for thumb finger gestures of joystick control. Biomed. Res. 28(11), 4730–4736 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vapnik, V.N.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Mccue, R.: A comparison of the accuracy of support vector machine and Naïve Bayes algorithms in spam classification. University of California at Santa Cruz, CA, Nov 2009

  22. Scholkopf, B., Sung, K.K., Burges, C.J., Girosi, F., Niyogi, P., Poggio, T., Vapnik, V.: Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classifiers. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45(11), 2758–2765 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ding, Y., Pardon, M.C., Agostini, A., Faas, H., Duan, J., Ward, W.O.C., Easton, F., Auer, D., Bai, L.: Novel methods for microglia segmentation, feature extraction and classification. IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 14(6), 1366–1377 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cover, T., Hart, P.: Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13, 21–27 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Borgelt, C., Timm, H., Kruse, R.: Probabilistic networks and fuzzy clustering as generalizations of Naive Bayes classifiers. In: Reusch, B., Temme, Karl-Heinz (eds.) Computational Intelligence in Theory and Practice. Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 121–138. Physica, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang, Z., Yu, H., Cang, S.: Impact of load variation on joint angle estimation from surface EMG signals. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 24(12), 1342–1350 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi, C., Kwon, S., Park, W., Lee, H., Kim, J.: Real-time pinch force estimation by surface electromyography using an artificial neural network. Med. Eng. Phys. 32(5), 429–436 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, S.K., Wisser, J.R.: Restoration of pinch in intrinsic muscles of the hand. Hand Clin. 28, 45–51 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Riillo, F., Quitadamo, L.R., Cavrinia, F., Gruppioni, E., Pinto, C.A., Pastò, N.C.: Optimization of EMG-based hand gesture recognition: supervised vs. unsupervised data preprocessing on healthy subjects and transradial amputees. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 14, 117–125 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malešević, N., Marković, D., Kanitz, G., Controzzi, M., Cipriani, C., Antfolk, C.: Vector autoregressive hierarchical hidden Markov models for extracting finger movements using multichannel surface EMG signals. Complexity 1, 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lu, W., Duan, J., Qiu, Z., Pan, Z., Liu, R.W., Bai, L.: Implementation of high-order variational models made easy for image processing. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39(14), 4208–4233 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohan, N., Kumar, S., Poornachandran, P., Soman, K.P.: Modified variational mode decomposition for power line interference removal in ECG signals. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 6(1), 151–159 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was jointly funded by the Thailand Research Fund and Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University through Contract No. RSA5980049, in part by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission. This research was also supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship from Prince of Songkla University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pornchai Phukpattaranont.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jitaree, S., Phukpattaranont, P. Force classification using surface electromyography from various object lengths and wrist postures. SIViP 13, 1183–1190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-019-01462-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-019-01462-z

Keywords

Navigation