Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Internet financial interest rate risk measure based on genetic rough set reduction

  • Special Issue paper
  • Published:
Service Oriented Computing and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving the accuracy of interest rate risk measure is an effective means of early warning of interest rate risks. Based on the analysis of the drives and effects of interest rate on Internet finance, interest rate risks are identified, and 15 evaluation indicators are initially constructed in this paper. Through the questionnaire survey of internet financial professionals, the risk size and importance degree of the initial indicators are scored, and the rough set mining reduction based on improved genetic algorithm is applied to improve the search efficiency. The evaluation indicators are reduced from fifteen to nine, and the core indicators affecting the measure of internet financial interest rate risk are obtained. Using these core indicators, an internet financial interest rate measure model is established, which is based on data mining and combined with 30,000+ data items from an internet finance company from January to July 2018. By comparing with the initial indicators, the validity of the measure model under the genetic rough set reduction is proved. The empirical results show that the model established by the optimized reduction improves the accuracy of measure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alsinani HS, Mitchell CJ (2011) Client-based cardspace-openid interoperation. In: Computer and Information Sciences II—international symposium on computer and information sciences

  2. Chan KY, Dillon TS, Singh J, Chang E (2012) Neural-network-based models for short-term traffic flow forecasting using a hybrid exponential smoothing and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 13(2):644–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo B (2016) Research on the factors affecting the successful borrowing rate of p2p network lending in China—taking the case of renrendai online lending as an example. In: International conference on industrial economics system and industrial security engineering

  4. Judi JA, Arasi FEM, Govindarajan DS (2011) Utility based resource allocation model for cloud services. Int J Manag Inf Technol

  5. Kaminsky GL, Reinhart CM (1999) The twin crises: the causes of banking and balance-of-payments problems. Int Finance Discuss Pap 89(3):473–500

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar SV (2017) Traffic flow prediction using Kalman filtering technique. Proc Eng 187:582–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li S, Du H, Lin X (2011) Finite-time consensus algorithm for multi-agent systems with double-integrator dynamics. J Tianjin Univ Technol 47(8):1706–1712

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Li WJ, Deng H, Chen X, Zhao TJ, Yu HY (2012) A new method of forward index with obtaining ID automatically. Adv Mater Res 468–471(10):596–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Jiao L, Shang R, Stolkin R (2015) Dynamic-context cooperative quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization based on multilevel thresholding applied to medical image segmentation. Inf Sci 294:408–422

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin M, Prabhala R, Judi J (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep 1: social networks and adverse selection in online peer-to-peer lending

  11. Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. Soc Sci Electron Publ 29(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mou SD, Tian YX, Lili, Xu AW (2016) A study of the internet financial interest rate risk evaluation index system in context of cloud computing

  13. Nag BR (1986) Electron transport in rectangular quantum wells. Pramana 27(1–2):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nascimento JC, Silva JG, Marques JS, Lemos JM (2014) Manifold learning for object tracking with multiple nonlinear models. IEEE Trans Image Process A Publ IEEE Signal Process Soc 23(4):1593

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh S, Kim Y, Hong J (2015) Urban traffic flow prediction system using a multifactor pattern recognition model. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 16(5):2744–2755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng CL, Qi-Zhi HE (2016) Study on interest risk measurement of p2p network lending market. J Lanzhou Univ Finance Econ

  17. Polson NG, Sokolov VO (2017) Deep learning for short-term traffic flow prediction. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 79:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raekow Y, Simmendinger C, Jenz D, Grabowski P (2013) On-demand software licence provisioning in grid and cloud computing. Int J Grid Utility Comput IJGUC 4(1):10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang FY, Zheng NN, Cao D, Martinez CM, Li L, Liu T (2017) Parallel driving in CPSS: a unified approach for transport automation and vehicle intelligence. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin 4(4):577–587

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolff R, Roberts DJ, Steed A, Otto O (2007) A review of telecollaboration technologies with respect to closely coupled collaboration. Int J Comput Appl Technol 29(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu Y, Kong QJ, Klette R, Liu Y (2014) Accurate and interpretable Bayesian mars for traffic flow prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 15(6):2457–2469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xue J, Shi Z (2008) Short-time traffic flow prediction based on chaos time series theory. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 8(5):68–72

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Z, Genlin JI (2014) Parallel algorithm for mining frequent item sets based on fp-growth. Comput Eng Appl 50:103–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengdong Mu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 11.

Table 11 General table of survey on online loan interest rate risk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mu, S., Xiong, Z. Internet financial interest rate risk measure based on genetic rough set reduction. SOCA 13, 309–321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-019-00274-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-019-00274-w

Keywords

Navigation