Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Power of the Hexagon

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The hexagon of opposition is an improvement of the square of opposition due to Robert Blanché. After a short presentation of the square and its various interpretations, we discuss two important problems related with the square: the problem of the I-corner and the problem of the O-corner. The meaning of the notion described by the I-corner does not correspond to the name used for it. In the case of the O-corner, the problem is not a wrong-name problem but a no-name problem and it is not clear what is the intuitive notion corresponding to it. We explain then that the triangle of contrariety proposed by different people such as Vasiliev and Jespersen solves these problems, but that we don’t need to reject the square. It can be reconstructed from this triangle of contrariety, by considering a dual triangle of subcontrariety. This is the main idea of Blanché’s hexagon. We then give different examples of hexagons to show how this framework can be useful to conceptual analysis in many different fields such as economy, music, semiotics, identity theory, philosophy, metalogic and the metatheory of the hexagon itself. We finish by discussing the abstract structure of the hexagon and by showing how we can swing from sense to non-sense thinking with the hexagon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Badir, S.: How the semiotic square came. In [9], pp. 427–442 (2012)

  2. Beziau J.-Y.: New light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corner. Log. Investig. 10, 218–232 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Beziau J.-Y.: The new rising of the square. In: Beziau, J.-Y., Jacquette, D. (eds.) Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition., Birkhäuser, Basel (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Beziau J.-Y.: History of the concept of truth-value. In: Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 11, pp. 233–305. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beziau J.-Y. et al.: Let be antilogic: anticlassical logic as a logic. In: Moktefi, A. (eds.) Soyons Logique, College Publication, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beziau J.-Y., (ed.): La Pointure du Symbole. Editions Pétra, Paris (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beziau, J.-Y., Jacquette, D. (eds.): Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser, Basel (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Beziau, J.-Y., Payette, G. (eds.): Special issue on the square of opposition. Logica Universalis 2(1) (2008)

  9. Beziau, J.-Y., Payette, G. (eds.): The Square of Opposition—A General Framework for Cognition. Peter Lang, Bern (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blanché R.: Quantity, modality, and other kindred systems of categories. Mind 61, 369–375 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanché R.: Sur l’opposition des concepts. Theoria 19, 89–130 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanché R.: Opposition et négation. Revue Philosophique 167, 187–216 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blanché R.: Sur la structuration du tableau des connectifs interpropositionnels binaires. J. Symb. Log. 22, 17–18 (1957)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Blanché R.: Structures intellectuelles. Vrin, Paris (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blanché R.: Sur le système des connecteurs interpropositionnels. Cahiers pour l’Analyse 10, 131–149 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boethius, Institutio Musica. ca 505. English translation: C.M. Bower, Fundamentals of Music. Yale University Press, New Haven (1989)

  17. Bréal M.: Essai de sémantique: science des significations. Hachette, Paris (1897)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cartier, P.: How to take advantage of the blur between the finite and the infinite. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-012-0043-z

  19. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: From Blanché’s hexagonal organization of concepts to formal concept analysis and possibility theory. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-011-0039-0

  20. Dufatanye, A.-A.: From the logical square to Blanché’s hexagon: formalization, applicability and the idea of the normative structure of thought. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-012-0040-2

  21. Fellbaum C.: Wordnet, an Electronic Lexical Database for English. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Granger G.G.: Pensée formelle et sciences de l’homme. Aubier, Paris (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grattan-Guinness I.: Omnipresence, multipresence and ubiquity: kinds of generality in and around mathematics and logics. Logica Universalis 5, 21–73 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Grigg R.: Lacan and Badiou: logic of the “pas-tout”. Filozofski vestnik 26, 53–65 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grize J.-B.: Des carrés qui ne tournent pas rond et de quelques autres. Travaux du centre de recherches sémiologiques 56, 139–152 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guitart, R.: A hexagonal framework of the field F4 and the associated Borromean Logic. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-011-0033-6

  27. van Heijenoort J.: Review of [13]. J. Symb. Log. 24, 228 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoeksema, J.: Blocking Effects and Polarity Sensitivity. In: Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (1999)

  29. Horn L.R.: A Natural History of Negation. University Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jaspers, D.: Logic and colour. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-012-0044-y

  31. Jespersen O.: Negation in English and Other Languages. A.F. Host and Son, Copenhagen (1917)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Joerden, J.C.: Deontological square, hexagon, and decagon: a deontic framework for supererogation. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-012-0041-1

  33. Kant, I.: Logik (Jäsche), 1800. English translation in Lectures on Logic, translated and edited by J. M. Young, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

  34. Lacan, J.: Le séminaire XX—Encore, Seuil, Paris, 1972–73. English translation: Jacques-Alain Miller (ed.) The Seminar XX, Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge; transl. by Bruce Fink. W.W. Norton and Co., New York (1998)

  35. Lacan J.: L’Étourdit. Scilicet Paris 6, 5–52 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lévi-Strauss, C.: Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. PUF, Paris (1949)

  37. Łukasiewicz J.: Logice trójwartościowej. Ruch Filozoficny 5, 170–171 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Łukasiewicz J.: Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Logic. Clarendon, Oxford (1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Łukasiewicz J.: A system of modal logic. J. Comput. Syst. 1, 111–149 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Luzeaux D., Sallantin J., Dartnell C.: Logical extensions of Aristotle’s square. Logica Universalis 2, 167–187 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Moretti, A.: Geometry of modalities? Yes: through n-opposition theory. In: Beziau, J.-Y., Costa Leite, A., Facchini, A. (eds.) Aspects of Universal Logic, Travaux de logique, vol. 17, pp. 102–145, Neuchâtel (2004)

  42. Moretti, A.: The geometry of logical opposition. PhD thesis, University of Neuchâtel (2009)

  43. Moretti, A.: Why the logical hexagon? Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-012-0045-x

  44. Parsons, T.: The traditional square of opposition. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006, online)

  45. Parsons T.: Things that are right with the traditional square of opposition. Logica Universalis 2, 3–11 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Pellissier R.: “Setting” n-opposition. Logica Universalis 2, 235–263 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Sesmat A.: Logique II. Les raisonnements, la logistique. Hermann, Paris (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Seuren P.M.: The Logic of Language—Language from within Volume II. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sigman M., Cecchi G.A.: Global organization of the Wordnet lexicon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 1742–1747 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Simons, P.: Approaching the alethic modal hexagon of opposition. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-012-0042-0

  51. Smessaert, H.: The classical Aristotelian hexagon versus the modern duality hexagon. Logica Universalis 6 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11787-011-0031-8

  52. Smith N.B.: The idea of the French hexagon. French Hist. Stud. 6, 139–155 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sullivan M.W.: Apuleian Logic. The Nature, Sources, and Influence of Apuleius’s Peri Hermeneias. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Tarski A.: Drei Briefe an Otto Neurath. 1936 published in Grazer Philosophische Studien 43, 1–32 (1992)

  55. Tiles M., Jinmei Y.: Could the Aristotelian square of opposition be translated into Chinese?. Dao J. Comp. Philos. 4, 137–149 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Vasiliev, N.: On partial judgements, the triangle of opposites and the law of excluded fourth. Scientific Papers of Kazan University (1910) (in Russia)

  57. Wajsberg M.: Ein erweiterter Klassenkalkül. Monatshefte fur Mathematik und Physik 4, 113–126 (1933)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Weil, A.: Sur l’étude algébrique de certains types de lois du mariage. Appendix in [36], pp. 257–272 (1949)

  59. Weil, A.: Souvenirs d’apprentissage. Birkhäuser, Basel (1991); English translation: The Apprenticeship of a Mathematician. Birkhäuser, Basel (1992)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNPq-Brazilian Research Council, University of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Jean-Yves Béziau

Authors
  1. Jean-Yves Béziau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Yves Béziau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Béziau, JY. The Power of the Hexagon. Log. Univers. 6, 1–43 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-012-0046-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-012-0046-9

Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords

Search

Navigation