Abstract
The 2nd World Congress on Logic and Religion, held in Warsaw, Poland, in 2017, is summarized. Then the connective “and” is analyzed; we focus on its meaning in the title of the congress and the title of the present volume. Finally, all the eleven papers included here are briefly introduced; we indicate whether logic or theology is the primary topic of the given paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archambault, J.: Counterpossibles and normal defaults in the filioque controversy. Log. Univers. 4(13), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00229-x
Beziau, J.-Y., Silvestre, R.: Logic and religion. Log. Univers. 1, 1–12 (2017)
Badici, E.: Iterated mixed strategies and Pascal’s wager. Log. Univers. 4(13), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00233-1
Buzaglo, M.: Gödel’s second theorem and the provability of god’s existence. Log. Univers. 4(13), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00235-z
D’Agostini, F.: Knowability and other onto-theological paradoxes. Log. Univers. 4(13), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00237-x
Gabbay, D.M., Schild, U., David, E.: The Talmudic Logic Project, ongoing since 2008. Log. Univers. 4(13), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00228-y
Krajewski, S: Theological Metaphors in Mathematics. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 44(57), the issue “Theology in Mathematics?” (ed. by Stanisław Krajewski and Kazimierz Trzęsicki), 13–30 (2016)
Krajewski, S.: Mathematical models in theology. A Buber-inspired model of God and its application to Shema Israel. J. Appl. Log. 6(6), 1007–1020 (2019)
Krajewski, S., Silvestre, R. (eds.): Concept of God. J. Appl. Log. 6(6), (2019)
Lemanski, J.: Logic diagrams, sacred geometry and neural networks. Log. Univers. 4(13) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00239-9
Murawski, R.: Mathematics and theology in the thought of nicholas of Cusa. Log. Univers. 4(13) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00232-2
Rojek, P.: Pavel Florensky’s theory of religious antinomies. Log. Univers. 4(13) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00234-0
Silvestre, R., Beziau, J.-Y. (eds.): Formal approaches to the ontological argument. J. Appl. Log. 5(6) (2018)
Trepczyński, M.: Non-monotonic logic and the compatibility of science and religion. Log. Univers. 4(13) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00230-4
van der Helm, A.: Thomas Manlevelt: god in logic. Log. Univers. 4(13) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00231-3
Vestrucci, A.: Metalanguage and revelation: rethinking theology’s language and relevance. Log. Univers. 4(13) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00236-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krajewski, S., Trepczyński, M. Theological Discourse and Logic. Log. Univers. 13, 417–423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00238-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-019-00238-w