Skip to main content
Log in

Intuitive Level System Rules: Commentary on “Utilitarianism and the Evolution of Ecological Ethics”

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Intuitive level system (ILS) rules are practical moral norms developed by societies for agents to follow more or less unreflectively. When they are the result of critical reflection, ILS rules recommend actions that promote the greater good of the whole.

  2. Personal correspondence with John M. Carley, Program Analyst, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, 11/2007. Carley notes that since EPA’s promulgation of the rule in February 2006 “the controversy has largely died down … and no proposals for new research involving intentional exposure of human subjects to pesticides to identify or quantify toxic endpoints have been submitted to the agency for several years.”

  3. After the re-registration process was begun prior to 1992, some 5,000 pesticides in use at the time of cancellation were dropped [4].

References

  1. Varner, G. (2008). Utilitarianism and the evolution of ecological ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(4).

  2. Oleskey, C., Fleischman, A., Goldman, L., Hirschhorn, K., Landrigan, P. J., Lappé, M., et al. (2004). Pesticide testing in humans: Ethics and public policy. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(8), 914–919. http://www.ehponline.org/members/2004/6522/6522.html. Accessed 18 Feb 2008.

  3. Bischoff, R. F. (1993). Pesticide chemicals: An industry perspective on minor crop uses. In J. Janick & J. E. Simon (Eds.), New crops (pp. 662–664). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ginaessi, L., & Puffer, C. A. (1992). Reregistration of minor use pesticides: Some observations and implications. Situation and Outlook Report: Agricultural Resources. www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3730/is_n25/ai_12134251. Accessed 18 Feb 2008.

  5. Hare, R. M. (1981). Moral thinking: Its levels, methods and point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Comstock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Comstock, G. Intuitive Level System Rules: Commentary on “Utilitarianism and the Evolution of Ecological Ethics”. Sci Eng Ethics 14, 575–579 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9096-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9096-z

Navigation