Abstract
Metaphysical and epistemological dualism informs much contemporary discussion of the relationships of science and religion, in particular in relation to the neurosciences and the religious understanding of the human person. This dualism is a foundational artifact of modern culture; however, contemporary scientific research and historical theological scholarship encourage a more holistic view wherein human personhood is most fittingly understood as an emergent phenomenon of, but not simply reducible to, evolutionary and developmental neurobiology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Ecumenical Roundtable on Science, Technology and the Church is comprised of the following denominational initiatives: the Episcopal initiative on Science, Technology and Faith (http://episcopalscience.org. Accessed 18 July 2012); the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America’s initiative on Faith, Science and Technology (http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Faith-Science-and-Technology.aspx. Accessed 18 July 2012); the Presbyterian Association on Science, Technology and the Christian Faith (http://www.pastcf.org. Accessed 18 July 2012); the Roman Catholic initiative on Science and Human Values (http://old.usccb.org/shv. Accessed 18 July 2012); the United Church of Christ Science and Technology Network (http://www.ucc.org/science. Accessed 18 July 2012); and a United Methodist initiative (http://www.wesnex.org. Accessed 18 July 2012).
References
Burpo, T. (2010). Heaven is for real: A little boy’s astounding story of his trip to heaven and back. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
Clergy Letter Project. (2004). http://theclergyletterproject.org/Christian_Clergy/ChrClergyLtr.htm. Accessed 18 July 2012.
Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes’ error—emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind—constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
de Waal, F. (2007). Chimpanzee politics—power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
Descartes, R. (1996). Discourse on the method and meditations on first philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping Magisteria. Natural History, 106, 16–22.
Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages. New York, NY: Ballentine Books.
Griffin, D. R. (2000). Religion and scientific naturalism—overcoming the conflicts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Institute for Creation Research (1972). http://www.icr.org. Accessed 18 July 2012.
Jonas, H. (2001). The gnostic religion. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Kant, I. (1999). Critique of practical reason. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2001). Critique of the power of judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2008). Critique of pure reason. New York, NY: Penguin Classics.
McGoldrick, T. A. (2012). The Spirituality of Human Consciousness: A Catholic Evaluation of Some Current Neuro-scientific Interpretations. Science and Engineering Ethics 18, (this issue).
Murphy, N. (2006). Bodies and souls, or spirited bodies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
NRSV. (2001). The New Oxford Annotated Bible, new revised standard version with the Apocrypha (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Plato. (1988). Phaedo. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Pope John Paul II. (1996). Truth cannot contradict truth. L’Osservatore Romano, 30 October.
Potts, R., & Sloan, C. (2010). What does it mean to be Human. Washington, DC: National Geographic.
Ryle, G. (2002). The concept of mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Van Huyssteen, W. (2006). Alone in the World: Human uniqueness in science and theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, J.B. Haunted by the Ghost in the Machine. Commentary on “The Spirituality of Human Consciousness: A Catholic Evaluation of Some Current Neuro-scientific Interpretations”. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 503–507 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9389-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9389-0