Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Applied Mereology of the City: Unifying Science and Philosophy for Urban Planning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on their research showing that growing cities follow basic principles, two theoretical physicists, Luis Bettencourt and Geoffrey West, call for researchers and professionals to contribute to a grand theory of urban sustainability. In their research, they develop a ‘science of the city’ to help urban planners address problems that arise from population increases. Although they provide valuable insights for understanding urban sustainability issues, they do not give planners a manageable way to approach such problems. I argue that developing an applied mereology to understand the concept of ‘city identity’ gives planners a theoretical device for addressing urban affairs, including ethical concerns. In turn, I devise a model of city identity to show how a ‘philosophy of the city’ contributes to a grand theory of urban sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. My claims about city identity entail that a city only has one identity, but due to the social and political conditions that govern how people come to know a city’s identity, people will describe the same city in several different ways. This topic, along with the kind of pluralism that Iris Marion Young exposed, presents challenges for a model of city identity. However, properly addressing such challenges is beyond the scope of this paper. For more information, see: Young (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  2. This account of a city’s parts is not exhaustive. There are other issues that deal with boundaries, smaller parts that compose larger parts, overlapping parts, and so on. The point here is to illustrate how the basic structure of mereology provides planners with an alternative approach for thinking about how a city fits together.

  3. One might think that a high frequency of successful exchanges between parts shows that a city has a strong meta-structure. While this point is worth examining, frequency becomes irrelevant in the face of certain failures. Consider, for example, if a bridge where to collapse. The frequency of successful exchange involving the bridge could be in the millions, yet one failure could significantly impact several other parts, weakening the meta-structure.

  4. It is worth pointing out that congruence does not necessarily entail justice. For example, in certain societies, there can be a high degree of congruence between parts, but there is also injustice. This reason is why I focused on failures in the previous section. Injustice counts as a failure, a condition that could nullify appeals to congruence.

References

  • Bettencourt, L., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science, 104(17), 7301–7306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L., & West, G. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467, 912–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. (2013). Sustainable development and social justice: Conflicting urgencies and the search for common ground in urban and regional planning. Michigan Journal of Sustainability, 1, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claudio, C., & Graziani, P. (2014). Mereology in engineering and computer science: Parts and wholes in the contemporary scientific context. Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colette, P. (2010). From the ground up: Why urban ecological restoration needs environmental justice. Nature and Culture, 5(3), 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotnoir, A. J. (2014). Composition as identity. In A. J. Cotnoir & D. L. M. Baxter (Eds.), Composition as identity (pp. 3–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Vignemont, F., Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). Body mereology. In G. Knoblich, I. Thornton, M. Grosjean, & M. Shiffrar (Eds.), Human body perception from the inside out (pp. 147–170). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa, R. (2006). Evaluating environmental justice claims. In J. Bauer (Ed.), Forging environmentalism: Justice, livelihood, and contested environments (pp. 360–376). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53(September–October), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovda, P. (2009). What is classical mereology? Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38(1), 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31(April), 220–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2012). Cully residents take stand against gentrification. Daily Journal of Commerce Oregon. http://djcoregon.com/news/2012/08/29/cully-residents-take-stand-against-gentrification/. Accessed June 3, 2015.

  • Jansen, L., & Schulz, S. (2014). Crisp islands in vague seas: Cases of determinate parthood relations in biological objects. In C. Claudio & P. Graziani (Eds.), Mereology in engineering and computer science: Parts and wholes in the contemporary scientific context. Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Z., Ludlow, D., Loibl, W., & Soomro, K. (2014). ICT enabled participatory urban planning and policy development. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2000). In Writings on cities (E. Kofman, & E. Lebas, Eds., Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Livengood, A., & Kunte, K. (2012). Enabling participatory planning with GIS: A case study of settlement mapping in Cuttack, India. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menser, M. (2012). The participatory metropolis, or resilience requires democracy. Center for Humans and Nature. http://www.humansandnature.org/democracy. Accessed May 29, 2015.

  • Menser, M., & Robinson, J. (2008). Participatory budgeting: From Porto Alegre, Brazil to the U.S. In J. Allard, C. Davidson, & J. Matthaei (Eds.), U.S. solidarity economy: Building alternatives for people and planet (pp. 291–303). Chicago, IL: ChangeMaker Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lambiotte, R., Pontil, M., & Mascolo, C. (2012). A tale of many cities: Universal patterns in human urban mobility. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e37027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, C. (2014). As city money revitalizes Cully Boulevard, locals work to prevent gentrification. The Oregonian. http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/03/as_city_money_revitalizes_cull.html. Accessed June 3, 2015.

  • Participatory Budgeting Project. (2015). Our impact. http://www.participatorybudgeting.org. Accessed June 1, 2015.

  • Paul, L. (2002). Logical parts. Noûs, 36(4), 578–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkowski, L. (2014). Engineering and computer science. In C. Claudio & P. Graziani (Eds.), Mereology in engineering and computer science: Parts and wholes in the contemporary scientific context. Switzerland: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. (2009). Reinterpreting metropolitan space as a strategy for social justice. In M. Pavel & C. Anthony (Eds.), Breakthrough communities: Sustainability and justice in the next American metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Tehnology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, J. (2003). Participatory planning in the Caribbean: An argument for radical democracy. In J. Pugh & R. Potter (Eds.), Participatory planning in the Caribbean (pp. 203–220). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2009). The McDonaldization of society. Los Angeles, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S., & Dotan, N. (2011). Delegating, not returning, to the biosphere: How to use the multi-scalar and ecological properties of cities. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 823–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (2012). By the grace of god. Portland monthly. http://www.portlandmonthlymag.com/issues/archives/articles/african-american-churches-north-portland-march-2012/. Accessed January 14, 2014.

  • Smith, N. (1986). Gentrification, the frontier, and the restructuring of urban space. In N. Smith & P. Williams (Eds.), Gentrification of the city (pp. 15–34). Winchester, MA: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, D. (2014). From food desert to food mirage: Race, social class, and food shopping in a gentrifying neighborhood. Advances in Applied Sociology, 4, 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theen, A. (2014). Trader Joe’s pulls plug on Northeast Portland development after ‘negative reactions’ from community. The Oregonian. http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/02/trader_joes_pulls_plug_on_nort.html. Accessed 27 May 2015.

  • Umemoto, K. (2001). Walking in another’s shoes: Epistemological challenges in participatory planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varzi, A. (2015). Mereology. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/mereology/. Accessed April 19, 2015.

  • Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shane Epting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Epting, S. An Applied Mereology of the City: Unifying Science and Philosophy for Urban Planning. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 1361–1374 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9696-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9696-3

Keywords

Navigation