Abstract
Scholars concerned with abuses of the “resource privilege” by the governments of developing states sometimes call for national sovereignty over the natural resources that lie within its borders. While such claims may resist a key driver of the “resource curse” when applied to mineral resources in the ground, and are often recognized as among a people’s territorial rights, their implications differ in the context of climate change, where they are invoked on behalf of a right to extract and combust fossil fuels that is set in opposition to global climate change mitigation imperatives. Moreover, granting full national sovereignty over territorial carbon sinks may conflict with commitments to equity in the sharing of national mitigation burdens, since much of the planet’s carbon sink capacity lies within territorial borders to which peoples have widely disparate access. In this paper, I shall explore this tension between a global justice principle that is often applied to mineral resources and its tension with contrary principles that are often applied to carbon sink access, developing an analysis that seeks to reconcile what would otherwise appear to be fundamentally incompatible aims.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong, C. (2014a). Against ‘permanent sovereignty’ over natural resources. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 14(2), 129–151.
Armstrong, C. (2014b). Justice and attachment to natural resources. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22(1), 48–65.
Beitz, C. R. (1975). Justice and international relations. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 4(4), 360–389.
Blomfield, M. (2013). Global common resources and the just distribution of emission shares. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21(3), 283–304.
Bumpus, A. G., & Liverman, D. M. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84(2), 127–155.
Caney, S. (2012). Just emissions. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 40(4), 255–300.
Climate Council of Australia (2015). Unburnable carbon: Why we need to leave fossil fuels in the ground. http://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/a904b54ce67740c4b4ee2753134154b0.pdf. Accessed 25 February 2016.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Hertwich, E. G. (2005). Consumption and the rebound effect: An industrial ecology perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 85–98.
Kolers, A. (2009). Land, conflict, and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kolers, A. (2012). Justice, territory, and natural resources. Political Studies, 60(2), 269–286.
Miller, D. (2012). Territorial rights: Concept and justification. Political Studies, 60(2), 252–268.
Myneni, R. B., Dong, J., Tucker, C. J., Kaufmann, R. K., Kauppi, P. E., Liski, J., et al. (2001). A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 98(26), 14784–14789.
Pogge, T. (2001). The influence of the global order on the prospects for genuine democracy in developing countries. Ratio Juris, 14(3), 326–343.
Pogge, T. (2008). World poverty and human rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Princen, T. (2015). The ethical: A fossil fuel ethic. In T. Princen, J. P. Manno, & P. L. Martin (Eds.), Ending the fossil fuel era (pp. 97–106). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Schrijver, N. (1997). Sovereignty over natural resources: Balancing rights and duties. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, H. (1994). An essay on rights. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Vanderheiden, S. (2008). Atmospheric justice: A political theory of climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vanderheiden, S. (2009). Allocating ecological space. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 257–275.
Wenar, L. (2008). Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36(1), 2–32.
Wolf, C. (1995). Contemporary property rights, Lockean provisos, and the interests of future generations. Ethics, 105(4), 791–818.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanderheiden, S. Territorial Rights and Carbon Sinks. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 1273–1287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9840-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9840-8