Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

3D Bioprinting Technology: Scientific Aspects and Ethical Issues

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scientific development of 3D bioprinting is rapidly advancing. This innovative technology involves many ethical and regulatory issues, including theoretical, source, transplantation and enhancement, animal welfare, economic, safety and information arguments. 3D bioprinting technology requires an adequate bioethical debate in order to develop regulations in the interest both of public health and the development of research. This paper aims to initiate and promote ethical debate. The authors examine scientific aspects of 3D bioprinting technology and explore related ethical issues, with special regard to the protection of individual rights and transparency of research. In common with all new biotechnologies, 3D bioprinting technology involves both opportunities and risks. Consequently, several scientific and ethical issues need to be addressed. A bioethical debate should be carefully increased through a multidisciplinary approach among experts and also among the public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Ramahi, J., Luo, H., Fang, R., Chou, A., Jiang, J., & Kille, T. (2016). Development of an Innovative 3D Printed Rigid Bronchoscopy Training Model. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 125(12), 965–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, G. J. (2017). Cure research and consent: the Mississippi Baby, Barney Clark, Baby Fae and Martin Delaney. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(2), 104–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldelli, I., Massaro, A., Penco, S., Bassi, A. M., Patuzzo, S., & Ciliberti, R. (2017). Conscientious objection to animal experimentation in Italian Universities. Animals Basel, 7(3), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balistreri, M. (2011). Superumani. Etica ed Enhancement. Torino: Espress.

  • Barron, J. A., Wu, P., Ladouceur, H. D., & Ringeisen, B. R. (2004). Biological laser printing: a novel technique for creating heterogeneous 3-dimensional cell patterns. Biomedical Microdevices, 6(2), 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourret, R., Martinez, E., Vialla, F., Giquel, C., Thonnat-Marin, A., & De Vos, J. (2016). Human-animal chimeras: ethical issues about farming chimeric animals bearing human organs. Stem Cell Research Therapy, 7(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busardò, F. P., Gulino, M., Napoletano, S., Zaami, S., & Frati, P. (2014). The Evolution of Legislation in the Field of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Embryo Stem Cell Research in European Union Members. Biomed Research Interntional 307160.

  • Chan, S., & Harris, J. (2011). Moral Enhancement and Pro-Social Behavior. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(3), 130–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciliberti, R., Martini, M., Bonsignore, A., & Penco, S. (2016). Break with tradition: donating cadavers for scientific purposes and reducing the use of sentient beings. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 52(2), 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condic, M. L. (2013). When Does Human Life Begin? The Scientific Evidence and Terminology Revisited, University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy, vol. 8, Issue 1 Fall 2013, art. 4. Retrieved from http://www.embryodefense.org/MaureenCondicSET.pdf.

  • Cornwall, J. (2016). The ethics of 3D-printing copies of bodies donated for medical education and research: What is there to worry about? The Australasian Medical Journal, 9(1), 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., & Boland, T. (2009). Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials, 30(31), 6221–6227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, H., Zhu, W., Holmes, B., & Zhang, L. G. (2016). Biologically inspired smart release system based on 3D bioprinted perfused scaffold for vascularized tissue regeneration. Advanced Science (Weinh), 3(8), 1600058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabrock, P. (2009). Playing God? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 3(1–4), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, P., Faas, M. M., Strand, B., & Calafiore, R. (2006). Alginate-based microcapsules for immunoisolation of pancreatic islets. Biomaterials, 27(32), 5603–5617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, S. (2015). 3D printing raises ethical issues in medicine. Analysis and Opinion, ABC Science. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2015/02/11/4161675.html.

  • Engelhardt, H. T. (1995). The Foundations of Bioethics (2nd ed.). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasperini, L., Maniglio, D., & Migliaresi, C. (2013). Microencapsulation of cells in alginate through an electrohydrodynamic process. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, 28, 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasperini, L., Maniglio, D., Motta, A., & Migliaresi, C. (2014a). An electrohydrodynamic printer for alginate hydrogels containing living cells. Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine International Society, 21, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasperini, L., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. (2014b). Natural polymers for the microencapsulation of cells. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 11(100), 20140817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, F., O’Connell, C. D., Mladenovska, T., & Dodds, S. (2017). Print Me an Organ? Ethical and Regulatory Issues Emerging from 3D Bioprinting in Medicine. Science and Engineering Ethics.

  • Greasley, K. (2014). A legal market in organs: the problem of exploitation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenetik? Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp Verlag.

  • Harris, J. (2011). Moral Enhancement and Freedom. Bioethics, 25(2), 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isa, N. M., & Shuri, M. F. H. S. (2017). Ethical Concerns About Human Genetic Enhancement in the Malay Science Fiction Novels. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9887-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, J. (1979). Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, M. B. (2006). Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me? Journal of Clinical Pathology, 59, 335–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. (2002). Life, liberty and the defense of dignity. The Challenge for Bioethics. San Francisco: Encounter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, F., & Sun, A. (1980). Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science, 210(4472), 908–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, B., Hsiao, W. K., & Martin, K. R. (2016). Three-dimensional printing of the retina. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 27(3), 262–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manti, F. (2009). Bios e polis. Etica, Politica, Responsabilità per la vita. Genova: Università degli Studi di Genova.

  • Maritain, J. (1973). Approches sans entraves. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, M., Penco, S., Baldelli, I., Biolatti, B., & Ciliberti, R. (2015). An ethics for the living world: operation methods of Animal Ethics Committees in Italy. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 5(3), 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mironov, V., Prestwich, G., & Forgacs, G. (2007). Bioprinting living structures. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 17, 2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mironov, V., Visconti, R. P., Kasyanov, V., Forgacs, G., Drake, C. J., & Markwald, R. R. (2009). Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials, 30(12), 2164–2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinelli, A., Bonsignore, A., Rocca, G., & Ciliberti, R. (2009). Medical treatment and patient decisional power: The Italian state of the art. Minerva Medica, 100(5), 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroni, L., De Wijn, J., & Van Blitterswijk, C. A. (2006). 3D fiber-deposited scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of pores geometry and architecture on dynamic mechanical properties. Biomaterials, 27(7), 974–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, E. (2015). The Risks of Revolution: Ethical Dilemmas in 3D Printing from a US Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1285–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patuzzo, S., & Manganotti, P. (2014) Deep brain stimulation in persistent vegetative States: ethical issues governing decision making. Behav Neurol, 641213.

  • Patuzzo, S., & Pulice, E. (2015). Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43(1), 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. D. (2000). Animal Revolution. Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesim. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. J. (2007). The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C., Meng, Q., & Zhang, G. (2014). Design of 3D printed insert for hanging culture of Caco-2 cells. Biofabrication, 17(1), 015003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1990). Animal Liberation (Revisited ed.). London: Thorsons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, J. L. (2015). To bioprint or not to bioprint. The North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 17(1), 123–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventola, C. L. (2014). Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. P and T Pharmacy and therapeutics, 39(10), 704–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, N., Haddow, G., Seymour, T., Faulkner-Jones, A., & Shu, W. (2017) 3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues. J Med Ethics. pii: medethics-2015-103347.

  • Vijayavenkataraman, S. (2016). A Perspective on Bioprinting Ethics. Artificial Organs, 40(11), 1033–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viola, F. (2010). Umano e post-umano: la questione dell’identità. Roma: Armando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, G. (2015). Printing Insecurity? The Security Implications of 3D-Printing of Weapons. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(6), 1435–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wengerter, B. C., Emre, G., Park, J. Y., & Geibel, J. (2016). Three-dimensional Printing in the Intestine. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 14(8), 1081–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, T., Zhao, W., Zhu, J. M., Albanna, M. Z., Yoo, J. J., & Atala, A. (2013). Complex heterogeneous tissue constructs containing multiple cell types prepared by inkjet printing technology. Biomaterials, 34(1), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, 37134, Verona, Italy

    Sara Patuzzo

  2. Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Verona, 37129, Verona, Italy

    Giada Goracci

  3. 3B’s, Department of Polymer Engineering, University of Minho, 4806-909, Caldas das Taipas, Portugal

    Luca Gasperini

  4. ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga, Guimarãs, Portugal

    Luca Gasperini

  5. Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, 16132, Genoa, Italy

    Rosagemma Ciliberti

Authors
  1. Sara Patuzzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giada Goracci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Luca Gasperini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rosagemma Ciliberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Patuzzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patuzzo, S., Goracci, G., Gasperini, L. et al. 3D Bioprinting Technology: Scientific Aspects and Ethical Issues. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 335–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9918-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9918-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation