Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the management academic research, academic advancement, job security, and the securing of research funds at one’s university are judged mainly by one’s output of publications in high impact journals. With bogus resumes filled with published journal articles, universities and other allied institutions are keen to recruit or sustain the appointment of such academics. This often places undue pressure on aspiring academics and on those already recruited to engage in research misconduct which often leads to research integrity. This structured review focuses on the ethics and integrity of management research through an analysis of retracted articles published from 2005 to 2016. The study employs a structured literature review methodology whereby retracted articles published between 2005 and 2016 in the field of management science were found using Crossref and Google Scholar. The searched articles were then streamlined by selecting articles based on their relevance and content in accordance with the inclusion criteria. Based on the analysed retracted articles, the study shows evidence of ethical misconduct among researchers of management science. Such misconduct includes data falsification, the duplication of submitted articles, plagiarism, data irregularity and incomplete citation practices. Interestingly, the analysed results indicate that the field of knowledge management includes the highest number of retracted articles, with plagiarism constituting the most significant ethical issue. Furthermore, the findings of this study show that ethical misconduct is not restricted to a particular geographic location; it occurs in numerous countries. In turn, avenues of further study on research misconduct in management research are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhavan, P., Ebrahim, N. A., Fetrati, M. A., & Pezeshkan, A. (2016). Major trends in knowledge management research: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1249–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S., Shaw, M. A., Steneck, N. H., Konkle, E., & Kamata, T. (2013). Research integrity and misconduct in the academic profession. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 217–261). Netherlands: Springer.

  • Batane, T. (2010). Turning to turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. (2010). Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 715–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S. J., & Dustira, A. K. (2000). New common federal definition of research misconduct in the United States. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(1), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Macfarlane, B. (2016). Academic integrity in China. In Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 1–6).

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A., Cornelissen, J., Delios, A., & Harley, B. (2014). Variety, novelty, and perceptions of scholarship in research on management and organizations: An appeal for ambidextrous scholarship. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, M. -R., & Qing, L. (2007). Retracted: A Tentative Study on Venture Capital Investment in China. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 4015–4018.

  • Dumay, J., Guthrie, J., & Puntillo, P. (2015). IC and public sector: A structured literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open, 4(1), 2158244014522633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028–17033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farthing, M. J. (2014). Research misconduct: A grand global challenge for the 21st century. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 29(3), 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guraya, S. Y., Norman, R. I., Khoshhal, K. I., Guraya, S. S., & Forgione, A. (2016). Publish or Perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 32(6), 1562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B., Faems, D., & Corbett, A. (2014). A few bad apples or the tip of an iceberg? Academic misconduct in publishing. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1361–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2017). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–33.

  • Honig, B., & Bedi, A. (2012). The fox in the hen house: A critical examination of plagiarism among members of the Academy of Management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juremi, N. R. M., Zulkifley, M. A., Hussain, A., & Zaki, W. M. D. W. (2017). Inter-rater reliability of actual tagged emotion categories validation using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(2), 259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacmar, K. M. (2009). From the editors: An ethical quiz. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 432–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami, M., Malekifar, S., Beigi Nasiri, A., Beigi Nasiri, M., Feili, H., & Khan, S. U. R. (2015). Retraction: “A conceptual model of the relationship between market orientation and supply chain performance”. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 34(4), 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M. M., Lau, S. H., & Lai, M. L. (2010). Notice of Retraction Life-long education and financial planning of graduate students: Evidence from Malaysia. Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Education Technology and Computer, 2, V2-251–V2-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, R. (1993). Case survey methodology: Quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1515–1546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Garlatti, A. (2015). Public sector knowledge management: A structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(3), 530–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolae, M. (2014). Retracted: Taking Action that Matters: A Dynamic Approach to Professional Development and Teacher Learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 718–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Federal research misconduct policy. Federal Register, 65(235), 76260–76264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinho, I., Rego, A., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2012). Improving knowledge management processes: A hybrid positive approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 215–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pupovac, V., & Fanelli, D. (2015). Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1331–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. J., Blevins, D. P., & Duffy, T. (2013). A five-year review, update, and assessment of ethics and governance in Strategic Management Journal. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russikoff, K., Fucaloro, L., & Salkauskiene, D. (2003). Plagiarism as a cross-cultural phenomenon. The CATESOL Journal, 15(1), 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salam, M. A. (2009). Retracted article: corporate social responsibility in purchasing and supply chain. Journal of Business ethics, 85(2), 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M. (2009). Editor’s comments: The better angels of our nature—Ethics and integrity in the publishing process. Academy of Management Review, 34, 586–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schminke, M., & Ambrose, M. L. (2011). Retracted: Ethics and Integrity in the Publishing Process: Myths, Facts, and a Roadmap. Management and Organization Review, 7(3), 397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. T., Libby, R., & Hunton, J. E. (2010). Retracted: When do analysts adjust for biases in management guidance? effects of guidance track record and analysts’ incentives. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(1), 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). Retracted: Studying impact of organizational learning on innovating. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 408–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, H. C., Duan, C. H., Tung, H. L., & Kung, H. J. (2010). Erratum to: Modern business ethics research: Concept, theory and relationships. Journal of business ethics, 93(3), 495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahedi, M., & Irani, F. N. H. A. (2011). Retracted: Information technology (IT) for knowledge management. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 444–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K. J., Makond, B., & Lin, Y. S. (2010). Notice of Retraction Forecasting based inventory management for supply chain. In Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2010 Seventh International Conference on IEEE, (Vol. 6, pp. 2964–2967).

  • Wier, B., Stone, D. N., & Hunton, J. E. (2005). Does graduate business education contribute to professional accounting success?(Retracted). Accounting Horizons, 19(2), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, L., & Zhu, Y. (2009). Notice of Retraction The Study on Grey Evaluation Method of Enterprise's Knowledge Innovation Ability Based on AHP. In Management and Service Science. MASS'09. International Conference on IEEE, 1–4.

  • Zhao, D., Xu, Q., & Zuo, W. (2010). Notice of retraction research and practice in the curriculum system for majors in software engineering. In 2010 Second international workshop on education technology and computer science (ETCS) (Vol. 1, pp. 417–420). IEEE.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Industrial Management, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

    Freida Ozavize Ayodele, Liu Yao & Hasnah Haron

  2. Faculty of Industrial Management, Governance and Integrity Center (FGIC), Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300, Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

    Liu Yao & Hasnah Haron

Authors
  1. Freida Ozavize Ayodele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liu Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hasnah Haron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Freida Ozavize Ayodele.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Database of literature used for the coding framework
Full size table
Table 4 Details results of the Cohen-Kappa’s inter-coder reliability analysis
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayodele, F.O., Yao, L. & Haron, H. Promoting Ethics and Integrity in Management Academic Research: Retraction Initiative. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 357–382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9941-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation