Skip to main content
Log in

How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud: View from a Different Culture

  • Letter
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Pellegrini, P. A. (2017). Science as a matter of honour: How accused scientists deal with scientific fraud in Japan. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9937-8. (Epub ahead of print).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiwanitkit, S., & Wiwanitkit, V. (2017). Responses of authors accused of plagiarism by journal editors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 309–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiwanitkit, V. (2013). Plagiarism, management, journal retraction and response by author’s institute. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 7(2), 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beuy Joob.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joob, B., Wiwanitkit, V. How Accused Scientists Deal with Scientific Fraud: View from a Different Culture. Sci Eng Ethics 24, 1659–1660 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9947-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9947-6

Navigation